| This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only". In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060 If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Fornication | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jul 5 2010, 08:57 PM (221 Views) | |
| Sedulius | Jul 5 2010, 08:57 PM Post #1 |
|
Field Marshal
|
I need you guys to go to work for me. My father, devout Christian though he may be, has challenged me to find any evidence that the Bible (not Christian churches) disapproves of premarital sex. I can say right now, since I have been reading it for the past few nights, that it says several times over in I Corinthians that fornication (premarital sex) is a sin. However, he counters that if two intend to wed, and the sex is done out of love, that such is not a sin. I counter that if they really love each other, they could just wait till marriage. I don't see why one can't simply be chaste. Now, I bring this up in the forum because I know TC has said something on this matter before given some old law when I had discussed the subject with Riri. I'd like to see the literature on that if possible. Otherwise, what I need are quotes from the Bible that clearly show that sex should not be outside of marriage. But care must be taken. Fornication is defined these days as sex outside of marriage, but 1) it is an English word translated from the Latin or original Greek, and 2) whatever the original Greek meant at the time it was written could have a much more specific definition than the rather wide definition of sex before marriage. Can you guys help me out? |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Jul 5 2010, 09:19 PM Post #2 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
If you need to find a Biblical basis, what is your father's Biblical basis for his view? In any case, "porneia" is a Greek word often rendered as fornication in English. Some assign it that, specific, meaning, while others give it broader meanings. For example, if I recall correctly, the Orthodox Church has historically understood this to refer to sexual misbehavior in general. Its worth remembering that in ancient Hebrew society, even engagements were binding contracts. Also, in the Old Testament, if a man violates an unmarried woman he is bound to marry her and, IIRC, pay her father the amount due. I haven't looked at any of this recently enough to offer more commentary, but what exactly are you trying to show your father? Is it an issue of understanding the Bible in its own context, or is he seeking to re-interpret it for modern culture? Because I can understand his view in light of Modern American culture, but it is hard to understand how that would fit in the framework of Ancient Jewish culture (whether in the time of the Old Testament, or in the 1st century). Traditional Middle Eastern sexual attitudes are certainly not modern American ones. |
![]() |
|
| Hastine | Jul 5 2010, 09:30 PM Post #3 |
|
Universi enim hic sumus.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Here's a chapter in the Bible I thought of when you proposed this question. Emphasis added, of course. :P
What I can gather from this, is that in Judaic Law, even having sex before marriage was a scandalous affair. What it means by public disgrace, I don't know, but it probably isn't just being put in the stocks and getting vegetables and feces thrown at you. It's probably full-blown stoning, the traditional punishment for outright adultery. So it's likely that premarital sex, as well as adultery, were lumped into the same category in Israel. This makes sense when you consider the ambiguous meaning of "fornication" itself, which refers generally to any sex outside of marriage, married or not. Later, Jesus himself said famously:
So basically, looking at a woman and thinking she's attractive is fine, but thinking any farther and imagining yourself boning her is crossing the line. What I get from this verse is that, since it doesn't even mention marriage and yet mentions adultery, that even lusting after an unmarried woman makes yourself impure for your future wife. Pretty extreme, true, but it provides a glaring example of how Jesus, and therefore the early Christians, viewed adultery, both marital and non-marital. Hope that helps a bit. Edited by Hastine, Jul 5 2010, 09:31 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Union | Jul 5 2010, 09:45 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Pyrenees Republic
|
Not at all. It is a social rejection only. They didn't want Mary to be known as the town tramp. This continued up to the 1960s. People in the modern age seem to think we are so much more advanced than those that came before us, in every way. It simply is not true. Just read the summary of the Golden Ass on wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Ass :rolleyes: Yeah, maybe an honor killing is POSSIBLE, but fornication was not unheard of in those times, and there certainly was no institutional punishment.
There is a difference between adultery and fornication.
Basically, sex outside of marriage is a sin. Try to keep in mind that common-law marriage qualifies as marriage. That being said, why should the morality of an ancient tribe of Israelites that was followed only loosely by its own people in any way have a bearing on modern moral standards? Edited by Union, Jul 5 2010, 09:49 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Sedulius | Jul 5 2010, 10:55 PM Post #5 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Okay, I can see more clarity is needed. My view is that sex before marriage is a sin no matter what the conditions of it are. His argument is that sex between a man and woman who intend to marry and do it in love is not a sin. He claims that there is no where in the Bible that says this is not the case. He says the sin of sex before marriage only applies to lustful sex. This argument has nothing to do with modern world view, but rather with his interpretation versus my interpretation of the Bible. We both consider ourselves devout Christians. I merely stand with the vast majority of Christendom on this one, especially because of my Othodox convictions. Thanks for the quotes and clarifications so far guys. However, I'll really have to memorize the quotes and put them into a structured argument. The only way to beat him is through sound logic and fact. Edited by Sedulius, Jul 5 2010, 10:56 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 5 2010, 10:56 PM Post #6 |
|
Deleted User
|
These Corinthians must have been some horny people. ... The Bible doesn't say a lot of things. It never says you can't use sex toys or masturbate. I don't get his argument. |
|
|
| Sedulius | Jul 5 2010, 10:59 PM Post #7 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Oh yeah, they certainly were. That's the main reason Paul wrote the letter to them. They had gone over to the Church, but they wanted to keep their old Greek traditions of orgies and the like. Each Church he wrote to had a specific problem. Theirs was sex. EDIT: Replying to your edit, I hear ya. Just because the Bible doesn't say something doesn't make it right. Is there possibly a fallacy I could call him on for saying that? Something to look into. Edited by Sedulius, Jul 5 2010, 11:01 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Union | Jul 5 2010, 11:06 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Pyrenees Republic
|
People are horny. The Israelis were no more chaste that Snooki. |
![]() |
|
| Sedulius | Jul 5 2010, 11:07 PM Post #9 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Who or what is Snooki? Sounds dirty. |
![]() |
|
| Telosan | Jul 5 2010, 11:10 PM Post #10 |
![]()
The Foremost Intellectual Badass
|
Snooki is one of the main female characters on that godforsaken show Jersey Shore. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 5 2010, 11:11 PM Post #11 |
|
Deleted User
|
I'm sorry, but its sad that you and Union know that, just downright sad. |
|
|
| Sedulius | Jul 5 2010, 11:13 PM Post #12 |
|
Field Marshal
|
You know guys, I am in DC. I'll be free all of tomorrow, prowling about the metro and what not. Any of you up for meeting the Sed? lol |
![]() |
|
| Telosan | Jul 5 2010, 11:15 PM Post #13 |
![]()
The Foremost Intellectual Badass
|
How so? That show's reputation is black around here, so naturally we know everything about it so we can be more offended by it. |
![]() |
|
| Sedulius | Jul 5 2010, 11:22 PM Post #14 |
|
Field Marshal
|
I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. :lol: |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 5 2010, 11:23 PM Post #15 |
|
Deleted User
|
Cause everything black is cool. That's how Obama won, because he was black and "cool". |
|
|
| Sedulius | Jul 5 2010, 11:32 PM Post #16 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Not everything black is not cool. Hip-hop culture is absolutely retarded. I have an urge to commit violence against hip-hop people. Jazz is cool. Several old big band and swing bands are cool, and some of the black ones are my favorite (i.e. The Ink Spots). If I hear someone call something black meaning cool, I'll call them gay meaning retarded. |
![]() |
|
| Telosan | Jul 5 2010, 11:37 PM Post #17 |
![]()
The Foremost Intellectual Badass
|
To say something has a black reputation is to say that it's infamous. You know, black as the devil's soul/heart kind of thing? |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 5 2010, 11:39 PM Post #18 |
|
Deleted User
|
Never said black wasn't cool. Its just the mainstream ideas, at least among most young people. Even if you don't like it, the rest of America thinks just because something is black, it has to be cool. Every white kid when they were young wanted to be black to be cool. We just wanted to be recognized by a black person as an "inside-out oreo". Ha, don't even talk to me about jazz, the blues, or any legitimate black music. I worship that stuff. |
|
|
| Telosan | Jul 5 2010, 11:58 PM Post #19 |
![]()
The Foremost Intellectual Badass
|
I never realized how much Americans are like the different kinds of Oreos. Double stuffed, triple stuffed, mint, inside out, double chocolate, golden, mint, etc. |
![]() |
|
| Sedulius | Jul 6 2010, 12:39 AM Post #20 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Wow. We went from Biblical interpretation to Oreos. I understand the usage of black meaning dark in nature and the like (i.e. black comedy is dark comedy, not African-American comedy, but most people don't get that). |
![]() |
|
| Hastine | Jul 6 2010, 06:55 AM Post #21 |
|
Universi enim hic sumus.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm so tempted to sig. :D Union, I can see your point. Although I still think "fornication" is an extremely broad term when applied to Biblical ideas, you've convinced me that, for the most part, it isn't in the same category as adultery. Also, the Golden Ass sounds like a hilarious book. I remember seeing a poster of it in my music class back in Grade 3 and, being the juvenile that I |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Jul 6 2010, 12:29 PM Post #22 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
For general denunciation of fornication see: Mt: 15:19, Mk 7:21, Acts 15:20, 29, 21:25, 1 Cor 6:13, 18, Gal 5:19, Eph 5:3, Col 3:5, 1 Thes 4:3, Rev 2:14, 20-21, 9:21 Nothing specifically about sex before marriage, but the traditional Jewish view of fornication is pre-martial sex and adultery. I didn't take the time to parse the text for the Greek to distinguish the exact sex acts being denounced. I just culled the references from elsewhere. As an aside, have you heard of BPBible? It's the electronic bible I use: it has plug-ins for various translations, commentaries and greek hewbrew dictionaries for easy referencing. Plus there's a fully portable version you can stick on a USB. Personally, I'm with you. But you'll find very few prescriptions against sex before marriage specifically. The reason for this is that up until fifty years ago sex before marriage was lustful. Period. Marriage was the sanctifier, that before god made sex good rather than evil. This is for a myriad of reasons. You need to talk to a Rabbi. Or to look for passages about marriage and being fruitful. Edited by Nag Ehgoeg, Jul 6 2010, 12:36 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Off-Topic · Next Topic » |











11:52 AM Jul 13