1st Convention of the TATO

This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only".

In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

1st Convention of the TATO; Prague, 20XX
Topic Started: Sep 21 2009, 01:26 AM (396 Views)
Alberto	Sep 21 2009, 01:26 AM Post #1
Resident Italian Posts: 1,230 Group: Members Member #372 Joined: September 18, 2007	Posted Image Prague was resurrecting from its ashes : its marvelous historical center had been the first concern of the government and had been carefully restaured by the best specialists of Europe . Meanwhile aids coming from all the Grand Duchy and all Europe were helping the reconstruction of the main hurban centres, while the government focused on stimulating the industry and the farming sector in order to supply the population . Money slowly made its appearence in the families, and the demand for consommation goods restarted to increase . Still the people was not in the pre-war conditions, but the state's treasure was still there and the reconstruction went on without problems . For the first time, since the day in which the Dominion overtook Prague after having been called by a group of golpists, foreign leaders were being invited in Prague to negotiate the future of the TATO but also to see the successes of the new Marslavan state... The conference was hosted in the ancient Royal Palace, wanted by the Holy Roman Emperor Charles IV in the XIVth century, and since then center of the Marslavan state . The delegates from all the TATO had come for an important issue : the TATO was operational, but nobody could still define what were its powers, its limits and its goal . All seemed pretty vague and some points needed to be discussed . Charles III, the new Grand Duke, was a bit emotionated : it was his first high level summit and wanted Marslava to enjoy his first diplomatical success since years . He stood up and opened the talks : " Sirs, I believe that the TATO has huge potentialities and that its conceptors had seen well in having such an idea . However the TATO's potentialities are not being fully exploited : the treaty should not turn to a piece of paper without any political value . Instead the countries within the TATO should establish durable relations in order to be always united in prosperity and in the advesrsities . Me and my staff have prepared a plan of reform, which would first of all involve the establishment of a total free trade agreement between the members, the suppression fo any barrier to the circulation of people and a greater collaboration in the scientific and intelligence field ; these are measures upon which we can all discuss . I now invite all the delegates to take the word and expose what they see as being best for the future of the organisation " He then sat, satisfied, the Conference could start .



Alberto	Sep 23 2009, 07:12 AM Post #2
Resident Italian Posts: 1,230 Group: Members Member #372 Joined: September 18, 2007	ahem...



Deleted User	Sep 26 2009, 08:38 PM Post #3
Deleted User	Owain Glyndŵr stood up to address the Council. "Article VII: 'This treaty has been primarily established as a means for mutual defense of nations in the face of an attack. All the undersigned reaffirm their faith in mutual defense and protection from aggressors, and recognize mutual defense to be amongst the primary reasons for this treaty�s creation.' "While my country favors closer relations, we feel as these reforms might put our individual autonomy at risk. We also do not wish to 'exploit' this treaty we have."
Deleted User


Alberto	Sep 27 2009, 02:50 AM Post #4
Resident Italian Posts: 1,230 Group: Members Member #372 Joined: September 18, 2007	" We must consider that the treaty will be respected only if there is a economical and political communion between its members . If the TATO fails to bring new advantages to its members, it is likely to become nothing more than a piece of paper . Hearing the opinion of the French Republic regarding this issue would surely be better... "



Deleted User	Sep 27 2009, 08:42 PM Post #5
Deleted User	"Does the opinion of the Welsh not matter!?"
Deleted User


Alberto	Sep 28 2009, 10:43 AM Post #6
Resident Italian Posts: 1,230 Group: Members Member #372 Joined: September 18, 2007	Surely I haven't expressed myself correctly, simply it was stated that the opinion of the makers of this treaty could bring something new in the discussion . What we intended to discuss with was however something that couldn't be refuse as : - Treaty of freedom of circulation of goods and people among the members of the TATO - Creation of a special line of communication between the leaders of the TATO - Creation of a common military staff and military excercises to increase the reliability of the TATO armies - Joint programes of research and studies between the members



Union	Sep 28 2009, 11:45 AM Post #7
Pyrenees Republic Posts: 3,219 Group: Forum Mods Member #307 Joined: December 27, 2006	Why is there need for a common military? Let us take after the Treaty of Konigsberg, the premier pre-Dominion force in Europe. It secured peace on the continent without the need of sacrificing sovereignty through joint militaries.



Toussaint	Sep 29 2009, 07:17 PM Post #8
Major Posts: 1,973 Group: Members Member #377 Joined: October 3, 2007	OOC: Sorry, I've been hellah busy. Anyways, IC: The French representative stood to make his remarks. "First off, I would like to thank my hosts here in Pargue for holding this conference and providing such generous accommodations. "As far as business goes, my Marslavan counterpart has raised an interesting point- A certain bond is definitely necessary between the nations of this alliance if it is to stand strong in world affairs. Running with the Marslavan suggestion, here are a few things that the French Republic would like to see established; 1) A mutual trade agreement that would facilitate trade between our countries. This could mean unrestricted trade, a dropping of tariffs, or whatever other plan any of us here may have- this is a goal, and is open to flexibility. 2) Creation of special lines of communications between TATO leaders would be very useful, as having a means of fast contact is always a valuable asset. I do not think anyone here is opposed to this? 3) Military exercises and war games are certainly a possibility, and would help establish the military strength of this treaty. I think we should be wary of common militaries in this instance, however, as the world's attitude towards them is not necessarily a pristine one. We should follow the examples of successful alliances, and keep our militaries separate but ready to coordinate. 4) Common research programs would be greatly appreciated. Technological and societal advances would hold special significance if they were made through collaboration of us allies. 5) In addition to these points, I would like to see a cultural exchange program flourish between our nations post-secondary education institutions. This would include a foreign exchange program with special openings for internships and future career pathways for students interested in working in another country. Fostering a sense of brotherhood between our peoples should be amongst the first points of interest if we are to stand strong as an alliance.



Telosan	Sep 29 2009, 07:54 PM Post #9
The Foremost Intellectual Badass Posts: 3,893 Group: Map Makers Member #445 Joined: May 27, 2008	The Falklands Confederation agrees to the mutual trade proposal. We'd also like to add our own contribution. To ease trade between the members of the TATO, we could create a single currency (OOC: ie RL euro), the value of which is the average of all our currencies worth. The TATO currency can be used directly alongside our own, thus preserving a small part of our cultures. We would like to inquire as to the form of communications you are referencing? The FC plans to appoint an official that deals with TATO-FC affairs. Could this be your meaning? Separate militaries should always be encouraged, as any action from a combined military would require a consensus of all the member states, leaving the opportunity that a less favorable member of the treaty would purposely be denied any help.



Deleted User	Sep 29 2009, 09:07 PM Post #10
Deleted User	"Wales refuses to lose its individual autonomy by creating a single, TATO currency. This will only cause our dollar's value to decrease, as we combine it with the other nations. We agree with the majority of the French's proposals, as none will infringe on our autonomy. Our nation strongly advocates military exercises among the nations, for this will only result more advanced military, as we are in a joint military exercise right now." OCC: Wales is going through a state nationalism right now, so its not going to like combining anything with another country.
Deleted User


NRE	Sep 29 2009, 09:49 PM Post #11
Map Tsar and Southern Gentleman Posts: 9,266 Group: Admin Member #120 Joined: April 21, 2005	OOC: Yeah sorry for being late, I've been meaning to post here. I keep making the Confederacy into some silent partner in this :lol: IC: "With all do respect to the representative of the Falkland Confederation, the UCSA would have to agree with our Wales counterpart that a unified currency perhaps isn't the best idea at this time. After all, while it was suggested with the best of intentions it would still require funds to be manufactured as well as added security to ensure such notes printed are secured as well as investing in anti-counterfeiting technology. This is money the Confederacy for one believes would be best invested at the moment in other more immediately means such a direct aid to less fortunate member nations." "However, creating cabinet or ministry level representatives for this alliance, whose sole job of course will be to coordinate cooperation and keep lines of communication open between our nations would certainly be a good step in the right direction. After all, though it will be the leaders of our countries who have the final decisions in such matters as called to their attention, we cannot expect them to be able to always direct their attention to TATO matters. Certainly the creation of such government officials in each member state would signify to the Confederacy each nation's true willingness to cooperation."



Porcu	Sep 30 2009, 07:13 PM Post #12
"Work is the curse of the drinking classes." Posts: 4,188 Group: Global Mods Member #415 Joined: February 19, 2008	"Aside from agreeing with all French points, our American comrades bring up an interesting point. Though a headquarters in Miami has already been established a solid structure for organized meetings and talks has not. I believe it is critical to the success of this alliance that communication between member states is quick and efficient. Though apart from simply designating individuals to Miami, what kind of structure were you thinking of establishing within the headquarters? A smaller, representative hierarchy? A council of sorts?" OCC: Question is addressed to NRE, but anyone can butt in.



Toussaint	Sep 30 2009, 11:38 PM Post #13
Major Posts: 1,973 Group: Members Member #377 Joined: October 3, 2007	OOC: I envision this communication to be something like a red phone that goes straight to the executive offices of each of our countries. Like the cold war hot line.



Deleted User	Oct 1 2009, 07:49 PM Post #14
Deleted User	Toussaint Sep 30 2009, 11:38 PM OOC: I envision this communication to be something like a red phone that goes straight to the executive offices of each of our countries. Like the cold war hot line. OCC: I'd rather see our leaders having the power rangers phones for special emergencies.
Deleted User


Toussaint	Oct 1 2009, 10:51 PM Post #15
Major Posts: 1,973 Group: Members Member #377 Joined: October 3, 2007	Atticus Oct 1 2009, 07:49 PM Toussaint Sep 30 2009, 11:38 PM OOC: I envision this communication to be something like a red phone that goes straight to the executive offices of each of our countries. Like the cold war hot line. OCC: I'd rather see our leaders having the power rangers phones for special emergencies. Perhaps a banana phone would be more appropriate?



Deleted User	Oct 2 2009, 12:41 AM Post #16
Deleted User	Toussaint Oct 1 2009, 10:51 PM Atticus Oct 1 2009, 07:49 PM Toussaint Sep 30 2009, 11:38 PM OOC: I envision this communication to be something like a red phone that goes straight to the executive offices of each of our countries. Like the cold war hot line. OCC: I'd rather see our leaders having the power rangers phones for special emergencies. Perhaps a banana phone would be more appropriate? Dibs
Deleted User


Great New France	Oct 3 2009, 05:56 AM Post #17
Major Posts: 1,844 Group: Members Member #106 Joined: February 26, 2005	Great New France will send its foreign minister Ludovic LASALLE to defend its interests within TATO. Great New France looks forward to fruitful discussions with its allies within this alliance and hopes the best success to it. Great New France would like to reiterate its position that TATO should primarily stay an alliance of sovereign states defending each other in case of an attack. It is Great New France's view that TATO should not outpace its influence in matters other than defence and security issues. Nonetheless, it is in our best interest and those of our partners to continue to work closely, notably in strengthening our military and defence cooperation but also working to strengthen our respective bilateral ties in economic, financial, cultural as well as other fields. Official Communiqu� from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Great New France



Deleted User	Nov 2 2009, 07:29 PM Post #18
Deleted User	I say we declare war on the treaty of Tara.
Deleted User


Telosan	Nov 2 2009, 09:03 PM Post #19
The Foremost Intellectual Badass Posts: 3,893 Group: Map Makers Member #445 Joined: May 27, 2008	OOC: Uh, is that even related? Why? You're in the LFN. Since Venice is a member of the LFN, the Falklands would agree, but you're a member of the LFN as well. My nations don't view you highly.



Deleted User	Nov 4 2009, 12:12 AM Post #20
Deleted User	Telosan Nov 2 2009, 09:03 PM OOC: Uh, is that even related? Why? You're in the LFN. Since Venice is a member of the LFN, the Falklands would agree, but you're a member of the LFN as well. My nations don't view you highly. I'm just trying to do whatever I can to bring it back to life.
Deleted User


« Previous Topic · Inter-regional Relations · Next Topic »