Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only".

In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
So I've been rather distracted.; Damn you MMOs!
Topic Started: Jun 3 2009, 01:58 AM (1,970 Views)
Quaon
Member Avatar
A Prince Amoung Men-Shoot First and Ask Questions Later
Further, why would a globalizing organization want to limit the free movement of people? Creating a xenophobic police state is completely counterproductive to globalization. North Korea is not a shining example of the New World Order.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Comrade Queen
Member Avatar
Comrade Bitchqueen
Quaon
Jul 2 2010, 11:27 PM
Quote:
 
Do you know how long it takes to write 400 pages? And edit it? There's a reason term papers are called term papers. It takes the term to write. And don't forget the friggin' EDITING process in addition to writing. Also, I actually overstated the length of time they took to propose it... it wasn't a couple weeks... it was only... A WEEK.

It's called copy pasting.
And when a hundred people are writing 400 pages not very long. This is how bills are written. You've no idea what you're talking about.
This guy is a hundred people?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viet_Dinh

That's the writer of the PATRIOT Act.

Quote:
 
Quote:
 
Yes. People wouldn't be talking about it otherwise. Thus "uncertainty."

I haven't looked much into that bombing myself, so I really don't have an opinion on it, but that isn't going to change the fact that others do and have reasons for their doubts concerning it.
Just because people are talking about something doesn't mean they should be taken seriously.


Everything bears investigation. You challenged the article's view on the Oklahoma Bombing and I supplied the evidence that calls McVeigh's confession into question. I do not let the government spoonfeed me the story. For example, I've spent several years looking at 9-11 and have come to the conclusion that the official conspiracy theory about Muslims doesn't add up. There's too much inconsistency.

Anyway, I do believe earlier Harumf voiced his distrust of the Oklahoma story. If you want to argue the miniscule points, take it with him because as I said, I know very little about it.

I can supply you with a few links concerning the problems people have with the official account.

http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d28-Oklahoma-City-bombing-tapes-erased
http://donttreadoncat.com/2010/05/wearechangeoklahoma-sgt-terrance-yeakey-oklahoma-city-bombing/

Take from that what you will.

Quote:
 
Quote:
 
Government. It's the job of the government to lie to you. That's what governments throughout history have done. If you believe governments are always honest and forthcoming, there's a bridge in Brooklyn that I want to sell to you.
:rolleyes:

There's a difference between not trusting the government and having a conspiracy theorist world view, which you clearly have.


Attacking a person you are arguing with is a sign of desperation and losing the argument.

"Toussaint"
 
Why wouldn't you need a passport? Mexico isn't the United States.


Once upon a time, before 2009, passports were only used for extracontinental travel for citizens of North America. All you needed was a record of your visit and basic I.D. Now we're being monitored by mandatory passports with RFID chips in them.

"Quaon again"
 
Further, why would a globalizing organization want to limit the free movement of people? Creating a xenophobic police state is completely counterproductive to globalization. North Korea is not a shining example of the New World Order.


That's why North Korea will likely be the next target after Iran. Remember that "new Axis of Evil" of Iraq-Iran-North Korea?

The U.S. police state; however, will not be "xenophobic" as it will make regular use of foreign police and troops. See that Interpol Diplomatic Immunity and this:
http://www.praguemonitor.com/2010/06/23/czechs-help-establish-chemical-warfare-unit-texas

Also, it is contemplating amnesty for the illegals living here.
Edited by Comrade Queen, Jul 3 2010, 12:11 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Union
Member Avatar
Pyrenees Republic
The Patriot Act was passed a month later, not a week, and you have clearly never worked in government if you believe Viet D. Dinh did anything but supervise the writing process.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Comrade Queen
Member Avatar
Comrade Bitchqueen
Union
Jul 3 2010, 12:11 AM
The Patriot Act was passed a month later, not a week, and you have clearly never worked in government if you believe Viet D. Dinh did anything but supervise the writing process.
I said PROPOSED!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Union
Member Avatar
Pyrenees Republic
Regardless, Vien did not single-handily write the USA PATRIOT Act.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Comrade Queen
Member Avatar
Comrade Bitchqueen
Union
Jul 3 2010, 12:16 AM
Regardless, Vien did not single-handily write the USA PATRIOT Act.
Well, he copy pasted most of it from earlier stuff as per the article stated, sooo....

You don't seem to be comprehending that they tried passing the general same content for decades prior to 9-11. Then... it happens and "whoohoo!" Rushed through Congress.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quaon
Member Avatar
A Prince Amoung Men-Shoot First and Ask Questions Later
Timothy McVeigh did a series of interviews where he explained exactly what he did and expounded upon why he was justified. He blew the building up. That is the end of the story.

Vien did not write the Patriot Act, he supervised it. As Union said, you have no experience whatsoever with government. Politicians have armies of people working under them that do the heavy lifting.

Quote:
 
For example, I've spent several years looking at 9-11 and have come to the conclusion that the official conspiracy theory about Muslims doesn't add up. There's too much inconsistency.
Well, those were wasted years of your life.
Quote:
 
Attacking a person you are arguing with is a sign of desperation and losing the argument.
Considering you reopened this debate with a personal attack on me, I don't think you really ought to be talking.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tristan da Cunha
Member Avatar
Science and Industry
Scythirus
Jul 3 2010, 12:27 AM
Union
Jul 3 2010, 12:16 AM
Regardless, Vien did not single-handily write the USA PATRIOT Act.
Well, he copy pasted most of it from earlier stuff as per the article stated, sooo....

You don't seem to be comprehending that they tried passing the general same content for decades prior to 9-11. Then... it happens and "whoohoo!" Rushed through Congress.
There is nothing inherently suspicious about that. Many laws are based on ideas percolating for years or decades before, and only become enacted by some precipitating event or shift in the political winds. For example the Civil Rights Act of 1964 plagiarized, word for word, material dating all the way back to Reconstruction. (The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is pretty much a copypasta of the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which had been struck down by the Supreme Court in 1883)

An alternative interpretation to the quick passage of the Patriot Act is just that the people behind it were quick to use Islamic terrorists' attack on the WTC as an excuse to pass the security law they've always wanted. Sure, they evilly took advantage of a crisis but that does not inherently provide evidence against or in favor of any possible theory of 9/11, whether the official story or the conspiracy theories.
Edited by Tristan da Cunha, Jul 3 2010, 12:48 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Comrade Queen
Member Avatar
Comrade Bitchqueen
Quaon
Jul 3 2010, 12:32 AM
Timothy McVeigh did a series of interviews where he explained exactly what he did and expounded upon why he was justified. He blew the building up. That is the end of the story.
His testimony's unreliable. Apparently he contradicts himself frequently.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:6tqQFNHg3M8J:community.livejournal.com/anarchists/2647318.html+mcveigh+contradicts+himself&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5piFEeTWwSsJ:www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/february2007/220207okcrevelations.htm+mcveigh+contradicted+himself&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Quote:
 
Vien did not write the Patriot Act, he supervised it. As Union said, you have no experience whatsoever with government. Politicians have armies of people working under them that do the heavy lifting.


Um... and everyone edits their own section? Rub out all the inconsistencies and faults? Independently? The rush job on such a polished, large document is astounding.

It takes roughly a year to publish a book, and they have an army of people at their disposal. The Patriot Act is very much the size of a book. A textbook to be exact.

Quote:
 
Quote:
 
For example, I've spent several years looking at 9-11 and have come to the conclusion that the official conspiracy theory about Muslims doesn't add up. There's too much inconsistency.
Well, those were wasted years of your life.


Another personal attack?

Quote:
 
Quote:
 
Attacking a person you are arguing with is a sign of desperation and losing the argument.
Considering you reopened this debate with a personal attack on me, I don't think you really ought to be talking.


Really? You were trolling. Everywhere I posted, even if there wasn't a mention of Infowars anywhere, you were posting: "Infowars sux." That's trolling. That's stalking. How was my mentioning fact an attack?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quaon
Member Avatar
A Prince Amoung Men-Shoot First and Ask Questions Later
Are you kidding me? You linked me a livejournal entry as evidence?

For one, the only guy who, from a cursory reading (no way I'm going through that entire discussion), says anything about contradictions, is talking about internal ones:
Quote:
 
He also contradicts himself a lot. He goes from saying "I had to leave the army because I was killing innocent people, and it just wasn't right" to killing innocent people by blowing up a building... he most certainly did suffer from some post traumatic stress, and was paranoid that the government was going to start taking over everything and walk into people's homes and take their guns. He was anti-government, and some of his politics I can get behind... but all in all... the dude was all over the place and viewed himself as "a professional" due to his years of training in the military.
I.e., McVeigh's rationale for his actions is inconsistent, not that he undertook them. The only person who actually actively denies anything, I think, is some freak with a cloning allegation.

Either you didn't read what you linked me or you do not understand even basic levels of subtlety (which would not be surprising, considering the fact that you equivocate the idea that certain parts of the PATRIOT act were cribbed from past attempts with OMG THE PATRIOT ACT WAS WRITTEN B4 9/11! and the idea that Vien supervised the writing with OMG HE WROTE IT HIMSELF

Quote:
 
Um... and everyone edits their own section? Rub out all the inconsistencies and faults? Independently? The rush job on such a polished, large document is astounding.

It takes roughly a year to publish a book, and they have an army of people at their disposal. The Patriot Act is very much the size of a book. A textbook to be exact.
For one, writing and publishing are too very different things. A single writer writes a book - and that can take anywhere from a month to a decade. Several editors edit it. The writer must be considered with aesthetics and readability. People writing in legalese are concerned with neither, and have scores of other people working with them. The fact that you are contesting this is ludicrous.
Quote:
 
Really? You were trolling. Everywhere I posted, even if there wasn't a mention of Infowars anywhere, you were posting: "Infowars sux." That's trolling. That's stalking. How was my mentioning fact an attack?
All of the places I posted you had posted a link to infowars or a similar conspiracy site.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Comrade Queen
Member Avatar
Comrade Bitchqueen
Quaon
Jul 3 2010, 01:29 AM
Are you kidding me? You linked me a livejournal entry as evidence?

Individual reviews are individual reviews. I was looking for what people had to say and stumbled across that along with the other. The other link I gave claims his testimony changed with the government's.

Quote:
 
For one, the only guy who, from a cursory reading (no way I'm going through that entire discussion), says anything about contradictions, is talking about internal ones:
Quote:
 
He also contradicts himself a lot. He goes from saying "I had to leave the army because I was killing innocent people, and it just wasn't right" to killing innocent people by blowing up a building... he most certainly did suffer from some post traumatic stress, and was paranoid that the government was going to start taking over everything and walk into people's homes and take their guns. He was anti-government, and some of his politics I can get behind... but all in all... the dude was all over the place and viewed himself as "a professional" due to his years of training in the military.
I.e., McVeigh's rationale for his actions is inconsistent, not that he undertook them. The only person who actually actively denies anything, I think, is some freak with a cloning allegation.


Eh. Yeah, I don't think cloning technology was that advanced either.

Quote:
 
Either you didn't read what you linked me or you do not understand even basic levels of subtlety (which would not be surprising, considering the fact that you equivocate the idea that certain parts of the PATRIOT act were cribbed from past attempts with OMG THE PATRIOT ACT WAS WRITTEN B4 9/11! and the idea that Vien supervised the writing with OMG HE WROTE IT HIMSELF


What I'm doubting is "a hundred people" wrote it. Most sections were classified thus preventing Congress to read those sections. How many lawyers have that level of clearance?

Quote:
 
Quote:
 
Um... and everyone edits their own section? Rub out all the inconsistencies and faults? Independently? The rush job on such a polished, large document is astounding.

It takes roughly a year to publish a book, and they have an army of people at their disposal. The Patriot Act is very much the size of a book. A textbook to be exact.
For one, writing and publishing are too very different things. A single writer writes a book - and that can take anywhere from a month to a decade. Several editors edit it. The writer must be considered with aesthetics and readability. People writing in legalese are concerned with neither, and have scores of other people working with them. The fact that you are contesting this is ludicrous.


They do care about laws being consistent with themselves. Laws are far more technical and complex than most books.

Unless you're reading a technical manual which, I would assume needs to be very consistent with itself.

Quote:
 
Quote:
 
Really? You were trolling. Everywhere I posted, even if there wasn't a mention of Infowars anywhere, you were posting: "Infowars sux." That's trolling. That's stalking. How was my mentioning fact an attack?
All of the places I posted you had posted a link to infowars or a similar conspiracy site.


Only one had Infowars links.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rhadamanthus
Member Avatar
Legitimist

As a reminder, while a debate can get heated, I don't want to see any personal attacks here, no matter who started it. Some of the comments have been pushing it.
Edited by Rhadamanthus, Jul 3 2010, 08:24 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
New Harumf
Member Avatar
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
R.D., up yours (in a loving, non-threatening way).

Tm McVeigh - ex-soldier - could have been "following orders."

L.H. Oswald - ex-soldier - could have been "following orders."

Vince Foster - murdered by the command of the Clintons.

Are you all so nieve to think our Government isn't low enough to do these sort of things?

Remember what happened with the first Roman Republic - threat of invasion from outside, so in panic and fear of a crisis, they strip themselves of power "temporarily", and invite Sulla in as a dictator to handle the crisis. End of the First Republic. It's as old a game in politics as there is - Ceaser used it, Nepoleon used it, Hitler used it. Washington could have easily used it, which is why he is so unusual in history. So, if you don't have a threat to your republic from outside, you make one, and the senate panics, and strips themselves of certain powers "temporarily" and gives more power to the executive branch, where lies the commander of the military (i.e. Sulla, Caeser, Napoleon, Hitler and his Brown Shirts, the only army Germany had at the time). Whether the events were created by the government, encouraged by the government, or just initially ignored by the government, doesn't matter much. The result is the same - power is "temporarily" transfered from the republic to a dictator, and it is never regained.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quaon
Member Avatar
A Prince Amoung Men-Shoot First and Ask Questions Later
Quote:
 
What I'm doubting is "a hundred people" wrote it. Most sections were classified thus preventing Congress to read those sections. How many lawyers have that level of clearance?
And again, this doubt shows your lack of familiarity with the way government works. The financial reform act is over 2,000 pages. It did not take a year to write.
Quote:
 

They do care about laws being consistent with themselves. Laws are far more technical and complex than most books.
Dude, get off this point. Laws are written quickly. That is how things work.

Also, let's review the threads where I responded to you:
http://s3.zetaboards.com/nationstates/topic/7379496/1/#new
Quote:
 
Once when my grandmother needed assistance (she had fallen) she called 911 and police officers arrived. That's a pretty standard thing (they were very nice and very helpful).

Calling these guys fascists is stupid; if what's alleged actually happened, they're just thugs, nothing more, unless you think that the big bad Obama regime is conspiring to taze all the grandmothers of the world.
The second part of this post was a response to Harumf calling the cops fascists - I questioned that, as I generally do not like seeing the word fascist thrown around baselessly - it's a rather specific term and its use as a political epithet annoys me. No mention of infowars, and nothing trolling you.

http://s3.zetaboards.com/nationstates/topic/7381002/1/#new

Quote:
 
Google Barack Obama and bath houses... it will make you go "WTF?"
I googled "Barack Obama bathouses". The first link there is infowars, so it seemed likely to me that your source was infowars. When you replied with others links I said not one of those links was from a credible source.

http://s3.zetaboards.com/nationstates/topic/7337672/2/
You post a large number of infowars links. I call bullshit.
Quote:
 
Tm McVeigh - ex-soldier - could have been "following orders."
Following orders all the way to his execution?
Quote:
 
L.H. Oswald - ex-soldier - could have been "following orders."
Oswald was a known communist sympathizer who had attempted to settle in the USSR. Unlikely.
Quote:
 
Vince Foster - murdered by the command of the Clintons.
Unsubstantiated.
Quote:
 
Are you all so nieve to think our Government isn't low enough to do these sort of things?
No. However, the bad shit the government does is generally not in the United States, for a number of reasons. (1) The CIA has no operations mandate within US territory, (2) it is much harder to get away with big things within the US than without, (3) people are short-sided and are much less likely to give a shit about things happening abroad. Most of the really bad stuff the government has done covertly have failed to stay covert for long - arming the Contras, trying to assassinate Castro, etc. - and, when they emerge from the dark, nobody gives a shit. Hell, we have a Hollywood movie glorifying the fact that we armed a bunch of backwards Jihadists in Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion.

When the government does evil, it's rarely on our shores - it's overseas, away from the public eye.

Further, a question for the conspiracy theorist(s) - if the conspirators blew up the Twin Towers, why couldn't they have "found" WMD in Iraq?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Union
Member Avatar
Pyrenees Republic
Quote:
 
What I'm doubting is "a hundred people" wrote it. Most sections were classified thus preventing Congress to read those sections. How many lawyers have that level of clearance?


Once again, you clearly have never worked in government.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Comrade Queen
Member Avatar
Comrade Bitchqueen
Quaon
Jul 3 2010, 12:38 PM
Quote:
 
What I'm doubting is "a hundred people" wrote it. Most sections were classified thus preventing Congress to read those sections. How many lawyers have that level of clearance?
And again, this doubt shows your lack of familiarity with the way government works. The financial reform act is over 2,000 pages. It did not take a year to write.
It didn't take a week, however.

Don't say it did, because I've been following that evil Fed Empowerment Act since March.

Quote:
 
Urgent Action: Stop Attempts to Kill Audit the Fed
From: Campaign for Liberty <john.f.tate@campaignforliberty.com>Add to Contacts
To: Leeland Deney <kojiro_chan@yahoo.com>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Dear Leeland,

Our battle to Audit the FED has reached a crisis.

Right now, a handful of Fed-loving U.S. Senators, led by Bob Corker (R-TN), Richard Shelby (R-AL), Chris Dodd (D-CT) and Judd Gregg (R-NH), are reportedly working to rewrite from the Financial Reform Bill to strip out Audit the Fed and actually EXPAND the Fed’s power over banks, lending and money.

I need you to contact your senators today with an urgent message: Audit the Fed and DON'T increase the Fed's power.

As you know, Audit the Fed is currently in H.R. 4173, a financial “reform” package that has passed the House.

The Senate will unveil its version soon, which means you and I have to work fast.

In addition to stripping out transparency and accountability, the Senate version is set to grant the Fed broad NEW powers over our economy by putting the Consumer Financial Protection Agency under the Fed’s purview.

Seriously? The same Fed that won’t tell us where our trillions of dollars went is going to be put in charge of “consumer protection?”

It would be funny if it weren’t so dangerous.

You and I must turn up the heat on the Senate TODAY.

Please contact Senator Maria Cantwell and Senator Patty Murray at once!

Of course, as you know, over two thirds of the House of Representatives, almost a third of the Senate and nearly 80% of the American people support a FULL Audit of the Federal Reserve.

So the establishment has no choice but to attempt to fight us in secret.

That’s why they’re trying every trick in the book to make sure they kill a full-scale Audit of the Fed.

And that’s why it has never been more important that you call Senator Maria Cantwell at 202-224-3441 and Senator Patty Murray at 202-224-2621 and DEMAND that they withdraw their support for ANY effort to strip the bill of the Audit, and oppose all efforts to grant the Fed more power under the guise of so-called “reform.”

It’s clear that passage of this bill would pretty much guarantee that the FED is never audited, allowing the banksters to continue to rob and loot the American people.

And this sounds like something taken directly out of the Ben Bernanke playbook.

You see, Ben Bernanke and his buddies have been claiming the need for Fed “independence” for some time now.

But what they’re really talking about is independence from accountability...

...Independence to keep printing money out of thin air without any oversight from the American people, further destroying our savings and wiping out the middle class.

That’s why it’s vital you take action IMMEDIATELY.

Please call Senator Maria Cantwell at 202-224-3441 and Senator Patty Murray at 202-224-2621 and demand that they stand with the nearly 80% of Americans who support a FULL audit of the Federal Reserve.

You and I are now very close to allowing the American people to have the first ever COMPLETE audit of the Federal Reserve, and without your efforts, Ben Bernanke and his cronies would have nothing to worry about.

But I’m afraid if you and I don’t act right away, all of our efforts up until now will be rendered useless.

And that’s something I’m not going to sit idly by and allow to happen.

If we’re going to stop this attempt to gut Audit the Fed, we must act before it’s too late.

So please, right now, call Senator Maria Cantwell at 202-224-3441 and Senator Patty Murray at 202-224-2621 and demand that they support a FULL audit of the Fed and OPPOSE all attempts to broaden the Fed’s power.

And if you can, please make your most generous contribution to help Campaign for Liberty alert millions of Americans to this battle.

But most importantly, please contact Senator Maria Cantwell and Senator Patty Murray TODAY.

Sincerely,

John Tate
President

P.S. Fed-loving Senators are working behind closed doors to strip Audit the Fed out of the Financial Reform Bill while granting the Fed even more power.

That’s why it’s vital you IMMEDIATELY call Senator Maria Cantwell at 202-224-3441 and Senator Patty Murray at 202-224-2621 and demand they stand with the nearly 80% of Americans who support a FULL audit of the Federal Reserve.

And if you can, please make a generous contribution to help with our efforts.



This message was intended for: kojiro_chan@yahoo.com
You were added to the system October 1, 2009. For more information
click here.
Update your preferences | Unsubscribe


Quote:
 
Quote:
 

They do care about laws being consistent with themselves. Laws are far more technical and complex than most books.
Dude, get off this point. Laws are written quickly. That is how things work.


No, not that quickly.

Quote:
 
Also, let's review the threads where I responded to you:
http://s3.zetaboards.com/nationstates/topic/7379496/1/#new
Quote:
 
Once when my grandmother needed assistance (she had fallen) she called 911 and police officers arrived. That's a pretty standard thing (they were very nice and very helpful).

Calling these guys fascists is stupid; if what's alleged actually happened, they're just thugs, nothing more, unless you think that the big bad Obama regime is conspiring to taze all the grandmothers of the world.
The second part of this post was a response to Harumf calling the cops fascists - I questioned that, as I generally do not like seeing the word fascist thrown around baselessly - it's a rather specific term and its use as a political epithet annoys me. No mention of infowars, and nothing trolling you.

http://s3.zetaboards.com/nationstates/topic/7381002/1/#new

Quote:
 
Google Barack Obama and bath houses... it will make you go "WTF?"
I googled "Barack Obama bathouses". The first link there is infowars, so it seemed likely to me that your source was infowars. When you replied with others links I said not one of those links was from a credible source.


Really? You actually put his first name in? I just put in "Obama."

On to your "Infowars" discovery, it just so turns out that it's not quite the right Infowars.

http://info-wars.org/about/

Oh sure, they're probably fans of Alex Jones, but I doubt he has anything to personally do with the site.

Quote:
 
http://s3.zetaboards.com/nationstates/topic/7337672/2/
You post a large number of infowars links. I call bullshit.


Read my response there.

Quote:
 
Further, a question for the conspiracy theorist(s) - if the conspirators blew up the Twin Towers, why couldn't they have "found" WMD in Iraq?


That was just an excuse to declare war and reportably, the Bilderbergs were actually split on that decision. Anyway, the real point of the war and the other wars and the spendalot games of other government programs have more to do with something else that's rather sinister. Take a look at those links I gave Nag and pay especial attention to his responses on the wars and my response to him.

Come on, you can figure it out. I gave enough clues.

Hell, I'll give you another: It has to do with banking and currency.
Edited by Comrade Queen, Jul 3 2010, 05:17 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quaon
Member Avatar
A Prince Amoung Men-Shoot First and Ask Questions Later
Quote:
 
No, not that quickly.
You're wrong. I'm not arguing this further. You're wrong.

What TC said makes sense.
Quote:
 
Read my response there.
Funny thing: all your non-infowars links don't say what you claim they say. They note that the drug trade in Afghanistan has grown; they also note that this has been occurring in Taliban controlled areas; the US government is not trafficking opiates. The only one that says otherwise is Press TV, which is the Iranian State Media.
Quote:
 
That was just an excuse to declare war and reportably, the Bilderbergs were actually split on that decision.
How do you know this? You say the NWO is the most insidious organization of all time, and yet you have people sitting in on their meetings?

Much easier explanation of Iraq: Bush wanted to finish his father's job, secure US dominance of oil reserves in the Middle East; cabinet likes second part.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Comrade Queen
Member Avatar
Comrade Bitchqueen
Quaon
Jul 3 2010, 05:28 PM
Quote:
 
No, not that quickly.
You're wrong. I'm not arguing this further. You're wrong.

And I say you're wrong.

Quote:
 
Quote:
 
Read my response there.
Funny thing: all your non-infowars links don't say what you claim they say. They note that the drug trade in Afghanistan has grown; they also note that this has been occurring in Taliban controlled areas; the US government is not trafficking opiates. The only one that says otherwise is Press TV, which is the Iranian State Media.


And Russia.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8599008.stm

Both sides of the story, Quaon. Both sides of the story.

Quote:
 
Quote:
 
That was just an excuse to declare war and reportably, the Bilderbergs were actually split on that decision.
How do you know this? You say the NWO is the most insidious organization of all time, and yet you have people sitting in on their meetings?


It was a claim Jim Tucker made. He's had a history of infiltrating their meetings.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:yC5FJRZpBgkJ:www.propagandamatrix.com/bilderberg_2002.html+bilderberg+split+iraq&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Don't sound so incredulous. You're the one claiming leaks never happened.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Quaon
Jul 3 2010, 12:38 PM
Hell, we have a Hollywood movie glorifying the fact that we armed a bunch of backwards Jihadists in Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion.
And what a damn good movie that was.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

:rolleyes:

The next thing to be discussed is the legitimacy of the US moon landing.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Toussaint
Member Avatar
Major
Atticus
Jul 5 2010, 12:10 AM
:rolleyes:

The next thing to be discussed is the legitimacy of the US moon landing.
Atticus
Jul 3 2010, 12:38 PM
And what a damn good movie that was.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
New Harumf
Member Avatar
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
I don't know about the moon landing, but the very first pictures of the surface of Mars had a Strohs beer can in it. Yes, it was that obvious, then, whoosh, that picture disappeared forever!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Sedulius
Member Avatar
Field Marshal
Quaon
Jul 2 2010, 10:02 PM
lolwut
SED SMASH! RAUGH!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Aelius
Member Avatar
Norman Warlord
Sedulius
Jul 5 2010, 10:42 AM
Quaon
Jul 2 2010, 10:02 PM
lolwut
SED SMASH! RAUGH!
lolwut :lol: :huh:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nag Ehgoeg
Member Avatar
The Devil's Advocate

Atticus
Jul 5 2010, 12:10 AM
:rolleyes:

The next thing to be discussed is the legitimacy of the US moon landing.
It took over 30 years for NASA to do the press release that explains why the flag is waving in the wind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Off-Topic · Next Topic »
Add Reply