Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only".

In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Fusion
Topic Started: Jun 3 2009, 12:37 AM (166 Views)
Allied Holdings International
Member Avatar
Major Bummer, reporting for duty!
 *  *
Is nuclear fusion off-limits as future tech, or just RAMT? 'Cause, theoretically, it could be operational within the century. I'm not arguing for or against, just curious as to whether or not precedent has been established.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eleytheria-Duo
Member Avatar
Resident Bystander
The laws of Fusion have been bent numerous times on these forums, but I would still pass it by the Mods just to get their take. Personally I don't like touching anything beyond the realms of "right now, but at a cost." And if fusion is going to cost more than it is worth, then there is no reason to pursue it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Allied Holdings International
Member Avatar
Major Bummer, reporting for duty!
 *  *
Eleytheria-Duo
Jun 3 2009, 01:00 AM
The laws of Fusion have been bent numerous times on these forums, but I would still pass it by the Mods just to get their take. Personally I don't like touching anything beyond the realms of "right now, but at a cost." And if fusion is going to cost more than it is worth, then there is no reason to pursue it.
M'kay, thanks. Turns out that plain ol' nuclear power should suit my purposes just fine, so it won't be an issue.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
Seeing as I have several gigantic multi-core fusion reactor complexes (that power superguns at that) spread across the world, I wouldn't worry about it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ulgania
Member Avatar
A better Zarathustra has never rode a horse
Kas... those seem to be under special circumstances... how much territory did we glass with that one explosion? :lol:

That said if you have a cool story in mind that involves it, just run it by the Mods and something can probably be worked out.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
Ulgania
Jun 3 2009, 01:36 AM
Kas... those seem to be under special circumstances... how much territory did we glass with that one explosion? :lol:

That said if you have a cool story in mind that involves it, just run it by the Mods and something can probably be worked out.
:gnarkgnark: ;)

But seriously AHL, whaddya got in mind? That would make our responses less vague. :huh:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Allied Holdings International
Member Avatar
Major Bummer, reporting for duty!
 *  *
Kasnyia
Jun 3 2009, 01:38 AM
:gnarkgnark: ;)

But seriously AHL, whaddya got in mind? That would make our responses less vague. :huh:
Orbital plasma gun, using chemical lasers to provide an ion channel through the atmosphere. But I'm probably just going to use a run-of-the mill neutral particle beam instead. Science works out better, and I won't need to refuel fission generators.

Maybe my advanced R&D facility will be powered by a prototype fusion generator.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
:o

I...uh....would run that by Nag or NRE first. :phear:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Allied Holdings International
Member Avatar
Major Bummer, reporting for duty!
 *  *
Kasnyia
Jun 4 2009, 12:49 AM
:o

I...uh....would run that by Nag or NRE first. :phear:
To be fair, it's probably no further off from RL tech than a certain space-based directed-emp weapon, but it'll be severely limited. I won't be picking off enemy commanders, or even tanks for that matter, from space.

EDIT: To clarify, this is a strategic, not tactical, weapon. It's meant to take out power stations, radar arrays, fuel dumps, that sort of thing. Big, sensitive, stationary targets.
Edited by Allied Holdings International, Jun 4 2009, 12:59 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
Tell them anyway. They have to be the judges of that.

Trust me. I speak from experience. :lol: :dry:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Menhad
Member Avatar
ET2(IDW)
Kasnyia
Jun 4 2009, 01:04 AM
Trust me. I speak from experience. :lol: :dry:
Lol same here

Mighty Mechs!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nag Ehgoeg
Member Avatar
The Devil's Advocate

The space based EMP weapon was approved for dumb reasons that won't be repeated once it's been blown up.

No more permanent weapons will be put into space on my watch.

Now if you want to put it into space so we can tell a story about blowing it up - then go right a-head with official admin approval.

Just don't think that it's gonna become a feature.

As for fusion in general... it's not too far fetched depending on the application. Giant reactors pumping out power so they can be used as specific plot devices is (just about) acceptable. Secret research labs running experimental non-cost effective technology is acceptable. But anything more than that is best avoided.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
Dumb reasons? The MJOLNIR as a plot device hasn't been abused, has it? I haven't used it since the Paradise campaign...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nag Ehgoeg
Member Avatar
The Devil's Advocate

Allied Holdings International
Jun 4 2009, 12:56 AM
To be fair, it's probably no further off from RL tech than...
Dumb reasons. It's a bad precedent. Or, rather, the Velyoran space base was a bad precedent.

There's nothing inherently wrong with the T-39. It was an interesting plot device that ran its course and has been commended to history.
There's nothing "wrong" with the MJOLNIR... except that it's been around so long that it's not really considered special anymore.

But the MJOLNIR has outlived it's roleplaying usefulness and is setting a bad precedent. I'd like to see people start setting the expiry dates of their super weapons in stone so we don't end up with escalating technology. I realise that it's not going to happen: I just think it'd be more fun.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
MJOLNIR ain't gonna survive the war, obviously, and Kasnyia has no intention of building another one in case some other madman takes control of it. And I agree about it outliving its usefulness.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Allied Holdings International
Member Avatar
Major Bummer, reporting for duty!
 *  *
Alright, no problem.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tristan da Cunha
Member Avatar
Science and Industry
The Veloryan moon base was awful.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nag Ehgoeg
Member Avatar
The Devil's Advocate

Tristan da Cunha
Jun 6 2009, 01:03 AM
The Veloryan moon base was awful.
Still there isn't it? Just awaiting a bold space themed story arc to plunge the world into darkness...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
New Harumf
Member Avatar
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
Nag Ehgoeg
Jun 6 2009, 08:11 AM
Tristan da Cunha
Jun 6 2009, 01:03 AM
The Veloryan moon base was awful.
Still there isn't it? Just awaiting a bold space themed story arc to plunge the world into darkness...
The Amish are building a ladder. A really looooong ladder!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply