| This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only". In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060 If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| EU Rome | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Dec 17 2008, 09:42 PM (148 Views) | |
| Rhadamanthus | Dec 17 2008, 09:42 PM Post #1 |
Legitimist
|
Have any of you played Europa Universalis: Rome? Either vanilla or with the newer Vae Victis expansion? I'd like to know if anyone has any thoughts on the game, since I like that time period and would like to see Paradox's take on it.
Edited by Rhadamanthus, Dec 17 2008, 10:35 PM.
|
 |
 
|
| Rhadamanthus | Dec 19 2008, 08:25 PM Post #2 |
|
Legitimist
|
Well ok, it was only $25 for the game and expansion so I bought 'em and will try them out. It looks like a version of EU in ancient times, which I love, so it should be interesting. |
|
|
|
| Paradise | Dec 19 2008, 09:52 PM Post #3 |
Resident bureaucrat
|
All Paradox games are good, although I prefer the HoI series. |
|
|
|
| Menhad | Dec 19 2008, 10:18 PM Post #4 |
ET2(IDW)
|
Mount&Blade is the shit. |
|
|
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Dec 19 2008, 10:29 PM Post #5 |
Science and Industry
|
My fav Paradox game remains EU1. Playing it for the first time was nothing less than a mind-altering experience. |
|
|
|
| Paradise | Dec 19 2008, 10:35 PM Post #6 |
|
Resident bureaucrat
|
I don't know that game. |
|
|
|
| Paradise | Dec 19 2008, 10:36 PM Post #7 |
|
Resident bureaucrat
|
EU2 > EU1 > EU3 (that doesn't mean EU3 is bad). |
|
|
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Dec 19 2008, 10:46 PM Post #8 |
|
Science and Industry
|
Oh no doubt EU2 is superior to EU1 from a technical standpoint. But EU1 changed everything, it was like the New World of computer games. |
|
|
|
| Rhadamanthus | Dec 19 2008, 10:54 PM Post #9 |
|
Legitimist
|
I have not played EU1. I've played a small amount of EU2 and a substantial amount of EU3. But I just brought home a great looking sandwich, so I'm going to think about that now. |
|
|
|
| Lvsitano | Dec 20 2008, 03:57 PM Post #10 |
Corporal
|
Whats the difference beetween EU1 abnd EU2? |
|
|
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Dec 20 2008, 04:38 PM Post #11 |
|
Science and Industry
|
EU2 has drastically improved gameplay |
|
|
|
| Paradise | Dec 20 2008, 06:28 PM Post #12 |
|
Resident bureaucrat
|
The main differences I can think of: - Event system; - Domestic policies; - Bigger world map; - Earlier start date; - Missionaries (IIRC, EU1 didn't have tem). |
|
|
|
| Lvsitano | Dec 20 2008, 06:29 PM Post #13 |
|
Corporal
|
the only thing I remember that was different was that i EU all cities where equal. |
|
|
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Dec 20 2008, 07:09 PM Post #14 |
|
Science and Industry
|
Hmm, you remembered incorrectly. |
|
|
|
| Paradise | Dec 21 2008, 08:50 AM Post #15 |
|
Resident bureaucrat
|
Equal in what sense? |
|
|
|
| Lvsitano | Dec 21 2008, 10:09 AM Post #16 |
|
Corporal
|
when you click on a province it shows a city,all cities looked european. |
|
|
|
| Filo | Dec 23 2008, 05:59 AM Post #17 |
General
|
I don't like Rome. Few nations not good relations between them and poor stuff. I hope they made something better in the future I'm expection Crusader King II° for example |
|
|
|
| « Previous Topic · Off-Topic · Next Topic » |
12:01 PM Jul 13