| This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only". In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060 If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Some cool maps. | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Dec 13 2008, 01:08 PM (312 Views) | |
| Telosan | Dec 13 2008, 01:08 PM Post #1 |
![]()
The Foremost Intellectual Badass
|
While desperatly looking for maps of the English duchies, I decided to look up a website I had used a long while back. They have updated it since then, as when I last saw it they had 2 maps. Now they've got 7 maps, all showing in a movie format. Its shows changes through time, like who controlled the Middle East through history, which American presidents led us into the bloodiest wars, spread of religion, and so on. Enjoy! |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Dec 13 2008, 02:34 PM Post #2 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
Very cool site! Though I don't like the "March of Democracy" map very much;referring to the later Roman Republic as a "democratic world power" is rather ridiculous. Edited by Rhadamanthus, Dec 13 2008, 02:38 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Lvsitano | Dec 13 2008, 02:40 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Corporal
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
yup,and it has errors,it gives independence to african nations before time... ;) I like the "Signs - of - Occupation ",parking lots... |
![]() |
|
| East Anarx | Dec 13 2008, 04:20 PM Post #4 |
|
Anarchitect
![]()
|
Yeah, and the fact that it calls America founded on Democracy is kind of ridiculous. The founding fathers were scared of democracy. Then, when Europe turns fascist on the map, America doesn't? What's with that? FDR was just as fascist as anyone else during that time. |
![]() |
|
| Quaon | Dec 14 2008, 05:00 PM Post #5 |
![]()
A Prince Amoung Men-Shoot First and Ask Questions Later
|
Also considering other nations were republics before the United States... |
![]() |
|
| Sedulius | Dec 15 2008, 02:08 PM Post #6 |
|
Field Marshal
|
I think the problem is that democracy is a term too lightly thrown around. The only true democracy that was on that map was Ancient Athens. The rest were republics that may or may not have incorrectly called themselves democracies (such as the US). |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Dec 15 2008, 03:54 PM Post #7 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
And even Athens's democracy would be scorned by most modern supporters of democracy as it is understood today. I think that aside from whatever errors they made, I find the whole concept of the "March of Democracy" offensive per se. |
![]() |
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Dec 15 2008, 04:03 PM Post #8 |
|
Science and Industry
|
I demand to see a comprehensive flash animation showing the changes and flux of all the national territories throughout the world and throughout the history of human civilization, set to appropriate music. |
![]() |
|
| East Anarx | Dec 15 2008, 04:24 PM Post #9 |
|
Anarchitect
![]()
|
Seconded. |
![]() |
|
| New Harumf | Dec 15 2008, 05:26 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
|
OK, nag, get to work! and there is a nice little piece by Dvorjak that would go really good with your animation. |
![]() |
|
| Great New France | Dec 16 2008, 06:31 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Major
|
Applauses for this answer! very correct, very true!!! Real democracy in its essential form is Athenian Democracy, which is direct democracy, this does NOT exist anywhere in the world, except maybe Switzerland. |
![]() |
|
| A.Q. | Dec 16 2008, 06:36 AM Post #12 |
![]()
Beautiful Snowflake
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
As I have said elsewhere, Athenian Democracy cannot be real democracy if not everyone could vote, so maybe I'm just saying that democracy, like communism, has never truly existed. |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Dec 16 2008, 10:40 AM Post #13 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
No, why would real democracy require everyone being able to vote? The classical Greeks invented the word specifically to represent their systems, in which not all people voted. So yes, that is real democracy. There is no other kind. |
![]() |
|
| A.Q. | Dec 16 2008, 11:17 PM Post #14 |
![]()
Beautiful Snowflake
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If we are translating democracy literally, I agree with you completely. But if we are using the good-old-American "rule by the people" definition, I'm gonna stick to my guns on this one. |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Dec 16 2008, 11:39 PM Post #15 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
Ah, I would preserve "democracy" for the classical Greek government type. In my opinion, any definition that renders the original definition nonsense is itself nonsense. I don't see why you want to adopt the popular definition when you clearly know better. Edited by Rhadamanthus, Dec 16 2008, 11:40 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| A.Q. | Dec 17 2008, 06:26 AM Post #16 |
![]()
Beautiful Snowflake
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't *want* to, but the word democracy has so evolved over time and lost its meaning that I am resigned to the ignorance and given in. |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Dec 17 2008, 09:29 AM Post #17 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
:lol: I know that feeling :( |
![]() |
|
| New Harumf | Dec 17 2008, 09:39 AM Post #18 |
![]()
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
|
We, i.e., the U.S. have always urged emerging governments to choose "Democracy" as represented by European Parlimentarian-types, since we always tell them it is too difficult to get anything done under our so-called "Federalist Republic" system. It is "that" democracy that is the joke - tyrrany of the majority and all that bunk. Democracy, as originally defined IS the Greek system, since they defined it, flaws and all. A "Republic" as originally defined, is the twice-used Roman system, since they defined that. Now, both Republics and Democracies have been bastardized by modern interpretation, but that does not change the "real" definition of either. I believe we are all smart enough to know the difference between the actual application of a definition and the bastardization of that definition. We can easily tell the difference between a "classical" communist system and it's subsequent facsist bastardizations throughout history, right? Why are we refusing to make the same distinctions regarding Republics and Democracies?? |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Dec 17 2008, 12:44 PM Post #19 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
Great post, Harumf; I agree completely. |
![]() |
|
|
|
| « Previous Topic · Off-Topic · Next Topic » |
















12:01 PM Jul 13