| This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only". In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060 If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Roxey Inn Mafia - Day Two | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 20 2008, 10:28 PM (2,965 Views) | |
| Nag Ehgoeg | Dec 7 2008, 05:36 PM Post #201 |
The Devil's Advocate
|
Dissuasion which led to not only a day 1 no lynch but has caused some people to vote no lynch on day 2 as well. And what is suspicious about TC? He's changed his vote a couple of times, giving reasons why without (really) jumping on the kill wagon. You'll note Paradise, that I have not voted against you. Your three black marks are only little things: things which may have been fully justified. While I intended to vote on day 1 after some more discussion, I did not. I even was silly enough to suggest a plan for not voting on day 1 (though I quickly retracted it when I realised it would not work). But I see no reason to vote for TC - other than the fact that we've gotta vote for someone. |
 |
 
|
| New Harumf | Dec 7 2008, 06:30 PM Post #202 |
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
|
E has unvoted nobody and voted for . . . . . nobody yet. Still gets my vote. |
|
|
|
| East Anarx | Dec 7 2008, 06:50 PM Post #203 |
Anarchitect
|
Still trying to maintain her morals as best she could, Claire said, "I refuse to vote death upon someone who has not threatened me. However, Harumf repeatedly has. Therefore, in self-defense, I vote for him." VOTE: NH |
|
|
|
| Paradise | Dec 7 2008, 07:10 PM Post #204 |
Resident bureaucrat
|
Here's a short chronology of TC's behavior: Day 1: 1. After RD's vote for Huesca, TC bandwagoned and voted Huesca; 2. He was convinced by my argument about a no lynch on the first day and he retracted his vote for Huesca; 3. He was convinced by RD's argument for a lynch on the first day and decided to vote for RD; 4. Seeing the no lynch option was getting a majority, he retracted his vote for RD. Day 2: 5. He voted Telosan without any justification. The fact that you defend him, despite him being the most suspicious person right now, is troubling. Maybe TC and you are both mafiates? That would explain the current situation... |
|
|
|
| A.Q. | Dec 7 2008, 07:21 PM Post #205 |
Beautiful Snowflake
|
Mafiates, as a rule, never defend each other. I'm still crippled by indecision. Online Mafia means you can't judge people's poker faces. |
|
|
|
| Paradise | Dec 7 2008, 07:27 PM Post #206 |
|
Resident bureaucrat
|
I understand why, usually, mafiates would not defend each other. This may very well be an exception. |
|
|
|
| Sedulius | Dec 7 2008, 08:23 PM Post #207 |
Field Marshal
|
Sedulius moves on to drinking black russians as the debate goes on, not caring to take part of it. |
|
|
|
| Draxis | Dec 7 2008, 09:26 PM Post #208 |
Captain
|
Nag I voted no one on day one. Currently I am eyes deep in paper writing so I have no time to do any IC/OOC things, just keeping up is about all I have time for. Vote Siad While I will admit that TC's actions are suspicious, I refuse to vote for him this night so we can keep our discussion alive. With the exception of TC here is my current list of suspicions, Siad Menhad Telo Huesaca All of them perked up my attention on day 1 and have somehow continued it in what little I am able to follow on day 2. Menhad and Siad as they each have denounced behavior they then embraced. Huesca because he has this strange way of just looking scummy no matter what he does... maybe I have trust issues... and Telo, scummy little telo, mainly his actions in night one made me suspect him, but his actions since then have not disproved my suspicions. Of course that could have all changed by now, but I'm trying my best to pay attention and keep track of people's actions so we can logically find our sum. |
|
|
|
| Telosan | Dec 7 2008, 10:04 PM Post #209 |
The Foremost Intellectual Badass
|
I've got more positives than anyone else. :D I'm the shining star of society! :lol: Not much has changed yet other than people explaining why they chose who they chose. I keep my vote and urge everyone to end this day by taking out the one that most of us hold a common suspicion of. I don't want to be charged with the killing of an innocent, but at one point or another we WILL have alot of people who started the vote against an innocent. Uccidiamo la mafia! |
|
|
|
| Rafzakael | Dec 8 2008, 11:55 AM Post #210 |
Beelzebub
|
The day is OVER. With 5 votes, TC is lynched. Debate raged throughout the day and, although no majority was reached, TC proved to be the most popular choice. Telosan, Huesca, AA, Paradise, and Siadhail closed in around the unfortunate victim, who began backing away slowly. He ran out of room in the small restaurant, however, and with his back literally to the wall, the desperate man pulled a gun from his coat. The crowd screamed and ducked, but swift maneuvering from AA and Siadhail saw the man disarmed and unconcious before any further damage could be done. The two miltary men quickly hefted TC's limp form, opened the front door once again, and heaved it out. With the temperature well below zero, TC would freeze to death long before he would wake up. TC was a MAFIATE. It is now NIGHT THREE. Night will end 12:00 AM, Thurs, Dec 11. |
|
|
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Dec 8 2008, 07:17 PM Post #211 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
|
Sorry for the night posting but I'm responding to this simply because it was posted well before the day was ended but time zones and real life prevented me from replying earlier. But I realise that I shouldn't be replying because it's night-time. So I'll delete it if I'm asked to by Raf. Voting no-one on day 1 is not something I find to be suspicious (unlike voting no-one on day 2). Trying to convince people to do something (whether gang up and kill someone or let the mafia get a free kill from inaction) is suspicious. Hence you not having any entry by your name in my notes. Just like randomly voting for an innocent on day 1 isn't suspicious on it's own. I'll refrain from replying to everything else that's been directed towards me until day 3 - as that'd be actual discussion and tactically useful rather than a simple clarification of a misunderstanding. Sorry again. |
|
|
|
| Union | Dec 12 2008, 12:38 PM Post #212 |
Pyrenees Republic
|
Huesca coughed slightly in his sleep. |
|
|
|
| flumes | Dec 12 2008, 01:02 PM Post #213 |
CLEVELAND ROCKS!
|
Flumes got up early for a nice hot breakfast............................... Or did he? :unsure: |
|
|
|
| Allesandra | Dec 12 2008, 01:22 PM Post #214 |
Only Girl Actively Participating in Threads
|
OOC: Where is Raf? |
|
|
|
| New Harumf | Dec 12 2008, 02:02 PM Post #215 |
|
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
|
Harumf rolls over in his sleep without disturbing his "bed partner"! |
|
|
|
| Paradise | Dec 12 2008, 04:03 PM Post #216 |
|
Resident bureaucrat
|
Use the other topic for commentaries please. |
|
|
|
| lebowski2123 | Dec 17 2008, 09:33 PM Post #217 |
Resident?
|
I'd say this is a pretty legitimate question now |
|
|
|
| flumes | Dec 19 2008, 02:16 PM Post #218 |
|
CLEVELAND ROCKS!
|
Agreed... |
|
|
|
| Paradise | Dec 19 2008, 04:52 PM Post #219 |
|
Resident bureaucrat
|
I guess he is busy with the end of the semester. |
|
|
|
|
|
| « Previous Topic · Off-Topic · Next Topic » |
12:01 PM Jul 13