| This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only". In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060 If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| A Judge in New Zealand is renaming somebodys child; thoughts??? | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jul 25 2008, 08:45 AM (124 Views) | |
| Rhadamanthus | Jul 25 2008, 08:45 AM Post #1 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
http://www.abajournal.com/news/new_zealand_judge_renames_girl_says_talula_does_the_hula_was_poor_choice I'm seriously divided on this. On the one hand, I don'y like the idea of a judge interfering with something like how people name their kids. On the other hand, the fact that the parents would honestly think it is acceptable to name their child 'Talula Does the Hula from Hawaii’ strikes me as symptomatic of some far deeper wrongness. How did they people would address their child? I see two solutions here. One, the judge could shorten that name to 'Talula.' I don't know for sure, but that looks it could form a perfectly good name. On the other hand, the girl is nine years old, and i would suspect that is is old enough to have a few ideas as to what a name that would be less embarassing to her would be. That way the judge would not impose his will on the family, but could instead empower the girl to make a more sensible decision than her parents had made. |
![]() |
|
| Union | Jul 25 2008, 09:02 AM Post #2 |
![]()
Pyrenees Republic
|
I some US counties it's illegal to name your child Judas or Lucifer. :lol: I wonder if someone named their child that somewhere else would be forced by a local judge to change it if they moved there... |
![]() |
|
| Paradise | Jul 25 2008, 09:03 AM Post #3 |
![]()
Resident bureaucrat
![]()
|
The interests of the child are more important here. |
![]() |
|
| Filo | Jul 25 2008, 09:30 AM Post #4 |
|
General
|
Not only is right change name to little girl...but her parents should be jailed...the baby is not a dog or a cat. We in Italy have a law against stupid or offensive names also if this dont save all the babies from stupd names help a lot. |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Jul 25 2008, 09:43 AM Post #5 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
First off, the kid didn't like the name. Secondly, the kid's lawyer told the court the girl wanted to be called "K". Third, making the kid a ward of the state was tempory (well for now). The parents can change it back. Forth, few more years and the kid can change her name legally anyway. Fifth, the kid was consulted. There are not two sides to this. Unless you count the right side and the wrong side. |
![]() |
|
| New Harumf | Jul 25 2008, 09:50 AM Post #6 |
![]()
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
|
"I respectfully disagree - there are three sides to this, the right side, the wrong side and the backside, and the backside is where the judge should have applied his influence to the parents." Signed: Moon Unit Zappa Dweezle Zappa Jedehdiah Turdbush Jack Kopff |
![]() |
|
| NRE | Jul 25 2008, 11:41 AM Post #7 |
![]()
Map Tsar and Southern Gentleman
![]()
|
A part of me has always believe a child should be left nameless until such time as they can make their own mind up but then another part of me believes that it's empowering to be vested with a family name that has survived the centuries. All in all it's the kids decision IMO |
![]() |
|
| Ulgania | Jul 25 2008, 01:07 PM Post #8 |
|
A better Zarathustra has never rode a horse
|
At 9 years old, I can understand that the girl wouldn't want such a name. But, at the same time she's still only 9, and this is shown by the choice 'K' for a name. My opinion? Let her way until she can make an informed, logical decision on a name change. To me, a name is just a name, but this is certainly a case where parents go too far with their choice. |
![]() |
|
| Quaon | Jul 25 2008, 01:07 PM Post #9 |
![]()
A Prince Amoung Men-Shoot First and Ask Questions Later
|
Considering that the girl didn't want the name and was consulted, the judge is pretty justified. Basing it off this one incident, I have a feeling that the parents are the sort of people who really shouldn't have children. |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Jul 25 2008, 01:23 PM Post #10 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
I have someone in my university called "Kay". |
![]() |
|
| Ulgania | Jul 25 2008, 01:42 PM Post #11 |
|
A better Zarathustra has never rode a horse
|
There's a difference between 'Kay' and 'K' :lol: |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Jul 25 2008, 02:15 PM Post #12 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
A lawyer in a court tells the jury to call the girl "K". How do you (or a reporter) know if there's an "ay" on the end? Add to that the fact that it is not uncommon (in the UK at least) to refere to annonymous witnesses and the like by the first letter of their first name. |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Jul 25 2008, 02:15 PM Post #13 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
Right, but that might only be a spelling issue in the article. Kay would be a perfectly legitimate name, and seems to fit the child's preference... so I vote for that. Maybe this shoulld be a poll thread. |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Jul 25 2008, 02:45 PM Post #14 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
According to the forum - RD's post was made 27 minutes ago and mine 28. Yet I am first. Curious. Additionally... when I made my post, RD's wasn't there. It's only just showing up for me. Seems like a glitch in the matrix. |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Jul 25 2008, 03:03 PM Post #15 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
And yours certainly was not there for me... I was responding to Ulgania. Glitch indeed... But I think its settled; we shall refer to this girl as Kay. |
![]() |
|
| Paradise | Jul 25 2008, 03:39 PM Post #16 |
![]()
Resident bureaucrat
![]()
|
No, there is a huge difference between the child's interests and her current preferences. At her age, she cannot understand the implications of changing her name to "K". If she was older (maybe 14), she would have been able to. |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Jul 25 2008, 03:42 PM Post #17 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
Bear in mind, the name "K" was what her lawyer said she wanted the jury to call her BEFORE the judge legally changed her name. We do not know what he changed it to. I'm hoping it's Ivona Tinkle. |
![]() |
|
| Assassin | Jul 25 2008, 05:25 PM Post #18 |
|
Field Marshal
|
They should let me rename the kid. I'm totally impartial here, and OBVIOUSLY normal enough to make a rational choice of name. Who thinks Clamidia is a nice name? Show of hands please. |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Jul 26 2008, 07:16 AM Post #19 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
Damn it lefty, get back down here. You to right hand! |
![]() |
|
| New Harumf | Jul 26 2008, 10:37 AM Post #20 |
![]()
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
|
I like Stinky Vagina! As a name. Don't read anything more into that. I really don't. Really. |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Jul 26 2008, 03:13 PM Post #21 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
I found another article on this topic: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25827708/ |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Off-Topic · Next Topic » |













11:46 AM Jul 13