Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only".

In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Political survey; Where do you stand?
Topic Started: Nov 9 2007, 11:40 PM (3,116 Views)
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
I wouldn't call my own ideologies status quo (if it was, people wouldn't look at me like I'm crazy or attack me for being too different), though I consider myself a centrist....

Perhaps I'm going by a different definition here. *shrugs*

As for Ron Paul and his cost cuting strategies, I'd go for it only if he wasn't allowed to go to town on it because I do have the feeling he would cut too much, when certain aspects can be repaired/streamlined/generally made better. Of course those certain aspects would be the exception rather than the rule, but regardless they would still exist.

If what Scy's chart says is accurate, I'd frankly hope for a more leftist candidate, if only to reverse the trend toward the right and balance it out towrd center.

EDIT- Nevermind TC, I see what you meant.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Comrade Queen
Member Avatar
Comrade Bitchqueen
Nag Ehgoeg
Nov 12 2007, 06:36 PM
But you need someone to reel in spending, address social issues, for the love of god fix Nawlins and protect your civil rights. Whatever candidate does that, would get my hypothetical vote.

That would be part of Ron Paul's game plan.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tristan da Cunha
Member Avatar
Science and Industry
Nag Ehgoeg
Nov 12 2007, 08:20 PM
Quaon
Nov 12 2007, 08:08 PM
Ron Paul is not the big business candidate. He has, throughout his tenure, fought for a economic sense and tried to prevent the decline of the dollar.

Yeah... somewhere, something is buggy.

Because you don't get that far right on the political compass without completely disagreeing with protectionism, market control and fighting inflation.

The Political Compass actually is very uninformative and can't tell you that much about a person's political views.

What does "right wing" mean anyways?

1.) We all know that taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor is considered "left wing". This is the realm of Marx and the socialists.

2.) We all know that "laissez faire" is considered "right wing". Ron Paul would support this.

3.) But what do you call using the government as a tool to take money from citizens and then give that money to large corporations? Is that "right wing" or some twisted form of "left wing"? This third option is what Hilary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Edwards, et al. support. It is also the political stance of choice for people like Mussolini and Hitler.

Ron Paul has nothing in common, economically, with the other people who share the right wing with him on the Political Compass.

THerefore, the Political Compass is woefully inaccurate.

One would think that big business hates big government. Actually, big business loves bloated, freespending governments - as long as the government hands out tax dollars to big business rather than spend it onthings like free health care. The oversized Federal Government grants monopolies to favored corporate interests, giving subsidies (AKA welfare) to multi-billion dollar corporations, and starting Middle Eastern wars on behalf of rich contractors who want to get even richer by dipping into the supposedly public budget.

In history, big business has always been allies with powerful government. Big business can't survive without it.

You mention that "far right" would be against market control. Big business like the legal monopolies and predictable government spending patterns that create inertia and stability for them; the American market is in fact highly controlled by a tight alliance of big business and government, and big business profits from government spending, since government is controlled by business anyways. This process has been going on in some form or another for about 150 years, accelerated in the 1930s, and now it is at a fever pitch. Not just in the US of course, in Europe and Japan too, though Europe has taken a decidedly leftist turn, and Japan is just... fucked.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
New Harumf
Member Avatar
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
OK, all, let me use my years of wisdom to expain some things here

(Does anyone else find it funny that the upper left quad and the lower right quad have NO ONE!)

Edwards: His only interest is the trial lawyers. All his money comes from the trial lawyers. He will vote for anything that will complicate law, and that's the truth. He is also a major hypocrite, a "limosine liberal" and full of shit as a person. He is also a liar, cheat and every other bad thing. Do not vote for Edwards.

Ron Paul: As has been said before - he opposes corporate bailouts by the feds. If Crysler collapses, so be it, and shame on the CEO and the Stockholders that put him in power. It is not the taxpayers obligation to save rich people. Corporations exist to make money for their shareholders, that is their ONLY purpose, and the shareholders are responsible if it doesn't. He is socially considerably more liberal than the chart shows, and is not in the lower right quad because he is running as a republican and doesn't want to totally piss off the religious, social right.

Hillary: Even if she wins all the primaries, she will never be the Dem candidate for president. Why? Way too much baggage, and if she becomes the candidate, the press will not be able to resist digging up all the dirt, liberal or not. She can only have so many reporters killed.

Now, fear Mayor Bloomberg. There is talk of him running, and he is a good administrator, but he is too much of a social engineer. Ban this, ban that! He scares the hell out of me.

Now, if ya want to know about other candidates, ask.

P.S. My Myspace account has Ron Paul as a friend, and the U.S. Constitution!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nag Ehgoeg
Member Avatar
The Devil's Advocate

Kasnyia
Nov 12 2007, 09:06 PM
I wouldn't call my own ideologies status quo (if it was, people wouldn't look at me like I'm crazy or attack me for being too different), though I consider myself a centrist....

My definition of status quo is vastly different to the situation you Colonalists have endured under Dubya... infact it's vastly different to the situation you've endured for quite some time. I can see where it'd be confusing in that the status quo I'm thinking of (centralism) hasn't actually been the status quo (in the states... or on our side of the pond for that matter) for a good long while.

[Edit]

NH: I'm a literate, polical person with broadband. If I wanted to know about the policies of Presidential candidates I'd already know and I certainly wouldn't trust the opinions of one person. :P

TC: The policial compass is comprised of a mere handful of questions with very predicatable results. Most of the questions that move you right wing do so by making you pledge your undying loyality to big business. Note I say "most" - by no means do all of them do this. But "Ron Paul's" "results" indicate that one cannot get that far right without hailing to the chief. If someone's made up where to put the dot based on the fact that he's "truely" right wing rather than "big government, big business" then it's stupid to frame it in the trappings of the policial compass - because then people like me who account for the biases of the test get a completely misleading impression.

Take, for example, the tale of the Knight and Knave - one of them always tells the truth and one always lies. Knowing this, you're forearmed and can account for this to get accurate information. Of course if someone changes the rules without telling you then you're buggered.

The fact that the Political Compass is woefully inaccurate just gives you more information when you're familiar with the failings of the tool used to generate it. Unless you bypass the test and simply place dots on a grid. Then, I'm in full agreement with everything you said.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
I'm randomly going to vote for Richardson or Huckabee, for absolutely no reason at all apart from the fact neither seems (key word) as insane as the rest of the guys. :D

Even if I'm wrong, I don't care. I'm sick of the rest of the candidates, Paul included.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tristan da Cunha
Member Avatar
Science and Industry
What are your positions on the issues, Kas?

What are your thoughts about how the US should deal with terrorism? How should the US conduct diplomacy, which countries should the US be favoring and which we shouldn't? Your thoughts about illegal immigration? Public spending? Social issues?

You should match your candiddate's positions with your own positions.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
No kidding. :rolleyes:

The whole reason I'm saying I'll vote for those to is simply because I'm expressing my annoyance at this election. One can be somewhat tongue in cheek you know.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Noriega
Member Avatar
Resident Hobbit
This just in! ^_^

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 2.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.74

Changed again.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eleytheria-Duo
Member Avatar
Resident Bystander
I shifted somewhat further to the right than the last time I took the test.

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 2.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.33
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Paradise
Member Avatar
Resident bureaucrat

I'm gonna add your tomorrow to the graph. I don't have the time right now.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eleytheria-Duo
Member Avatar
Resident Bystander
Paradise
Nov 13 2007, 09:05 PM
I'm gonna add your tomorrow to the graph. I don't have the time right now.

Its fine. I don't really need to be on any chart, anyway. Just stating any changes in my "political compass."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Paradise
Member Avatar
Resident bureaucrat

Updated.

By the way, welcome to my quadrant Norightsia :lol:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Holy Empire of Racaria
Member Avatar
Sergeant
 *  *  *  *
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.03

That's about right.

Please add me to the chart.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
And here I was hoping the thread would die until there were major changes in the election line up (since thats what the discussion will boil down to again). Ah well. <_< :P
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Holy Empire of Racaria
Member Avatar
Sergeant
 *  *  *  *
Kasnyia
Dec 1 2007, 05:50 PM
And here I was hoping the thread would die until there were major changes in the election line up (since thats what the discussion will boil down to again). Ah well. <_< :P

U.S. Pres. lineup?

Man, that's been pretty much lined up for months.

Republican: Guliani/Romney
Democrat: Clinton/Obama

........And I'm stuck folks. :(
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
While you're likely correct with the Democratic line up, the Republican line up is hardly that settled, despite those two being front runners.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Holy Empire of Racaria
Member Avatar
Sergeant
 *  *  *  *
Kasnyia
Dec 1 2007, 05:57 PM
While you're likely correct with the Democratic line up, the Republican line up is hardly that settled, despite those two being front runners.

I want to believe you as I am NOT a fan of that GOP ticket, it just seems that way to me right now, sadly.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
The race for GOP ticket will not be decided until the 11th hour. Anyone who claims it to be Romney/Giuliani now is wasting their time and behind the curve on current polls.

An if you're stuck, just don't vote this election. Simple.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Union
Member Avatar
Pyrenees Republic
SETH TYRSSEN 2008
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rhadamanthus
Member Avatar
Legitimist

The Republican lineup has been shifting rapidly in various odd directions for months. Like Kas said, its not even remotely decided.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tristan da Cunha
Member Avatar
Science and Industry
Hmm, after the most awful candidate is elected as President of the United States (and he or she will be), I may have to move to Russia.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rhadamanthus
Member Avatar
Legitimist

Tristan da Cunha
Dec 1 2007, 05:16 PM
Hmm, after the most awful candidate is elected as President of the United States (and he or she will be), I may have to move to Russia.

I can call that election! United Russia wins ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Holy Empire of Racaria
Member Avatar
Sergeant
 *  *  *  *
Kasnyia
Dec 1 2007, 06:03 PM
The race for GOP ticket will not be decided until the 11th hour. Anyone who claims it to be Romney/Giuliani now is wasting their time and behind the curve on current polls.

An if you're stuck, just don't vote this election. Simple.

Hmmm you may be right. I will feel compelled to vote tho, anything to stop Hitlary.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kasnyia
Member Avatar
Chairman of the Bank
Hilary won't win. Every card carrying Democrat and self-proclaimed liberal that I know pwersonally hates her. They all want Obama to get the ticket. The air of inevitabiliy shep uts off is just that; an air.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Off-Topic · Next Topic »
Add Reply