| This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only". In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060 If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Military Structure; Help? | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Apr 11 2007, 07:45 PM (408 Views) | |
| Al Araam | Apr 13 2007, 04:18 PM Post #26 |
![]()
Demigod of Death & Inactivity
![]()
|
Yes, plus the same amount of firepower can be provided by smaller vessels designed to mount guided missiles, which have a much longer range and are generally more accurate. |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 13 2007, 04:21 PM Post #27 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
But where's the fun in that? :lol: |
![]() |
|
| Al Araam | Apr 13 2007, 04:41 PM Post #28 |
![]()
Demigod of Death & Inactivity
![]()
|
:D And that's exactly why people insist on keeping there battleships around, obsolete or not. Nothing is quite as satisfying as a full broadside from 18 inch naval guns at close range. :lol: |
![]() |
|
| Kasnyia | Apr 13 2007, 04:45 PM Post #29 |
|
Chairman of the Bank
|
Oh indeed. I'm even trying to give cruiser/destroyer-like capabilities to my sB Type I ships...faster, wit missiles... :D |
![]() |
|
| lebowski2123 | Apr 13 2007, 04:53 PM Post #30 |
![]()
Resident?
|
so do i keep them now, or can i not have them? EDIT: Plus, if i have 4,500,000 troops of normal quality, would 2,250,000 troops be twice as good? |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Apr 13 2007, 06:07 PM Post #31 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
2,250,000 troops could be upto twice as good, yes. They don't have to be twice as good. But, yes they can be. (There's no advantage to them not being twice as good, I'm just saying they don't have to be.) |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 13 2007, 08:22 PM Post #32 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
Please don't. That would totally ruin the concept. :rolleyes: |
![]() |
|
| Union | Apr 15 2007, 06:31 PM Post #33 |
![]()
Pyrenees Republic
|
Hey, whats the rule for nuclear warheads? If we want some, can we just RP having them? I onyl want four. |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 15 2007, 06:38 PM Post #34 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
They're not in the system. There are two unwritten rules that involve the subject. One is the unlimited munitions rule. That means that ammunition, ordinance, and the like (including nukes) is assumed to be infinite. So you can have four nukes. However, there is also the WMD rule. WMDs like nukes are not conventional weapons, and so you don;t use them like conventional weapons. You must obtain express permission from the victim to use your nukes. |
![]() |
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Apr 15 2007, 06:38 PM Post #35 |
|
Science and Industry
|
Yeah anyone can have nukes. But nukes cannot be used unless the target nation agrees to be nuked. EDIT: Nor has explained it. |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Apr 16 2007, 06:06 AM Post #36 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
One addition, if you take max values of everything you are allowed (in terms of man power and military hardware) then claim to have hundreds of thousands of IBCMs, AA possitions, and dozens of nukes... then we will crucify you for godmoding. If you want nukes (or indeed anything not covered by this guide) take a moment to consider how your government got said weapons (and how they paid for them). |
![]() |
|
| Union | Apr 16 2007, 09:58 AM Post #37 |
![]()
Pyrenees Republic
|
Naw, I only want four, each positioned on a submarine so I can scare people when the time comes. No godmodding here, no sir. |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2












9:33 AM Jul 11