| This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only". In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060 If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The World War; Let us discuss...again. | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Apr 4 2007, 09:28 AM (3,412 Views) | |
| Kasnyia | Apr 10 2007, 01:53 PM Post #176 |
|
Chairman of the Bank
|
We should start out with specific sides too..sure there should be switching about but atleast a few core sides to the war....some nations that don't change...tis an idea... |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 10 2007, 01:57 PM Post #177 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
I think that the powerful old Monarchies/Autocracies (Islamic Brotherhood, Romania and Co., etc.) would form a united front against JAUST (a conglomeration of all the World's lesser powers, democracies, and whatnot). Nations that have specific interests on one side could go against the grain if they had to. Personally, I propose that a new alliance of the powers that be (Baghdad Pact II, without Pan-Arabism and stuff) be set up to counter popular alliances (specifically JAUST) that undermine the traditional order of the superpowers controlling all. |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Apr 10 2007, 02:04 PM Post #178 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
Oh, the upstarts vs the old order? One of the great battle of history... and maybe here the old guard can actually win? The Counter-revolution lives! |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 10 2007, 02:07 PM Post #179 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
Yes, that would be poignant and highly ironic! :lol: |
![]() |
|
| Kasnyia | Apr 10 2007, 02:10 PM Post #180 |
|
Chairman of the Bank
|
Why the HELL do you guys seem intent on destroying JAUST?! We haven't even been around six months in RL. We need more alliances. Bah. EVeryone targets JAUST for no reason in particular especially when they dont make any enemies. <_< :angry: |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 10 2007, 02:13 PM Post #181 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
Because its frickin annoying! :lol: But I never said JAUST had to be destroyed. Just beaten. Most nations in JAUST never lost a war anyways. |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Apr 10 2007, 02:14 PM Post #182 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
Dude... chill out. If things work out, I may design a much bigger target one of these days. |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 10 2007, 02:15 PM Post #183 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
Thanks be to God. |
![]() |
|
| Kasnyia | Apr 10 2007, 02:28 PM Post #184 |
|
Chairman of the Bank
|
Well as long as JAUST doesn't get destroyed outright at the end of this, I'm up for stuff. Losses are fine as long as JAUST still survives.... I do like the upstarts versus oldguard idea though...especially since I'm one of the old guard...yet I'm with the upstarts..interesting dynamic... |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Apr 10 2007, 03:00 PM Post #185 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
Look up Baghdad Pact sometime. Seriously. JAUST is getting off easy. |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 10 2007, 03:04 PM Post #186 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
You were one of the exceptions I had in mind. And remember the Holy League? They caught far more Flak then JAUST has. JAUST is the biggest alliance, therefore everyone else must hate it. |
![]() |
|
| Al Araam | Apr 10 2007, 03:05 PM Post #187 |
![]()
Demigod of Death & Inactivity
![]()
|
Yeah, feel free to complain to former Baghdad Pact members when an alliance comprised of nearly half the world is formed for the sole purpose of keeping you in check. Good times, good times. :D RD, we should make another push to revive it, since it's beginning to seem like the first one didn't really cause too much to happen. |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | Apr 10 2007, 03:07 PM Post #188 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
Well, AA, I think that would be a great idea. As I told you on MSN, I think the new BP should be an alliance dedicated to preserving the balance of powers, since most of its members would rather like the status quo. |
![]() |
|
| Assassin | Apr 10 2007, 03:09 PM Post #189 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Well, once my Europe conflict starts with a bang (HA! Pun!) I'd like to know who is against me, and who's with me. I assume I'll have JAUST support. Who's going to side with the commies? |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 10 2007, 03:10 PM Post #190 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
All the big kids on the block should side with Yshurak lol. Adrian is going to side with the Commies. Velorya will initially side with the Assassins, but you know what is going to happen, don't you AA? B) |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Apr 10 2007, 03:12 PM Post #191 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
Commies have the nukes right? They'll get support from mainland Nag Ehgoeg. |
![]() |
|
| Assassin | Apr 10 2007, 03:21 PM Post #192 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Nor, its scary how alike we are sometimes. :lol: I figure that most of Europe will side with Yshurak since it will look like I really did nuke them, which I assume they will claim. Which I will deny, and look guilty. JAUST should believe me when I say I didnt nuke them, so theres my major support. Maybe EE and GS will support me as well (Not sure.) I assume that just about every damn comunist nation will side with Yshurak, as well as most of Europe. The islamic nations I have no clue, and will most likely be a wild card here, leaning towards Yshurak. Now for the real important questions. (But dont ignore my original one just yet. I'll need to know who's doing what so I can come up with a WW plan here.) 1) Who's on who's side. Most of that being worked out now. 2) CP system, or new guide. Either or is fine with me. I'd prefer the new system. 3) Winner? I'm more than willing to lose, and Scy has permission to nuke my Europe place all to hell. I'd also be willing to lose land. This is if my side cant win. If it looks like we'll pull this off, I'll need to know what people are willing to lose temporarily. 4) Major battle regions/sites. Europe is a given. Asia will likely be a big one as well. What am I missing? Feel free to chime in if you think I've missed something. |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 10 2007, 03:34 PM Post #193 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
You of course know the land situation in Asia, AA. Also, I prefer the new system too. |
![]() |
|
| Assassin | Apr 10 2007, 03:37 PM Post #194 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Yea, Asia will heat up pretty quickly. :lol: |
![]() |
|
| Eleytheria-Duo | Apr 10 2007, 03:40 PM Post #195 |
|
Resident Bystander
|
Asia is always heated, if you so much as twitch your mustache at anyone, they stick you in the eye with their dinner forks. :lol: |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Apr 10 2007, 03:42 PM Post #196 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
If you only knew... :gnarkgnark: :gnarkgnark: :gnarkgnark: |
![]() |
|
| Union | Apr 10 2007, 04:24 PM Post #197 |
![]()
Pyrenees Republic
|
I'd be against anyone who tries to attack Iberia without my consent. So long as everyone remains up north, I won't get involved. |
![]() |
|
| Kasnyia | Apr 10 2007, 04:38 PM Post #198 |
|
Chairman of the Bank
|
I think the Muslim Brotherhhod should be a third side, going against the other two. While JAUST and the Commies are fighting they can try for a European land grab starting with Asia minor. |
![]() |
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Apr 10 2007, 04:42 PM Post #199 |
|
Science and Industry
|
If I'm interpreting CE's newwest thread in the Interregional forum correctly, CE is mounting a comeback. |
![]() |
|
| Eleytheria-Duo | Apr 10 2007, 04:44 PM Post #200 |
|
Resident Bystander
|
Yeah I have seen it, I have to say that I am interested. |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |











9:33 AM Jul 11