| This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only". In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060 If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Where would you rather live? | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 29 2006, 02:13 PM (630 Views) | |
| New Harumf | May 30 2006, 09:55 PM Post #26 |
![]()
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
|
OK, sorry, yes, I'd prefer Esternarx, but I also like Los Angeles. Let's see, sixteen year old arson - 21 year old surfer! You figure it out!! |
![]() |
|
| East Anarx | May 30 2006, 09:56 PM Post #27 |
|
Anarchitect
![]()
|
LA is a "left-wing utopia", Esternarx is a "capitalizt". LA has a 27% income tax, Esternarx doesn't have taxes of any kind. LA's economy is "developing", Esternarx's is "frightening", now you tell me which is more libertarian? |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | May 30 2006, 10:01 PM Post #28 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
That's cause I don't do any issues. I think I've done like two for LA. On Forum LA is more capalist than Esternarx IMHO. And no danger or irradiation. |
![]() |
|
| Catholic Europe | May 31 2006, 04:27 AM Post #29 |
|
Spammer
|
I would probably choose somewhere like Free Britain. |
![]() |
|
| Filo | May 31 2006, 06:50 AM Post #30 |
|
General
|
Burgundy should like to you...conservative and laical |
![]() |
|
| Assassin | May 31 2006, 08:33 AM Post #31 |
|
Field Marshal
|
:lol: No one wants to live in A.A.? Cant say I blame you. Its nearly a complete opposite for what I would like. If I had to pick a country to live in... Well, I dont know. Its a tough question. :unsure: |
![]() |
|
| Rhadamanthus | May 31 2006, 10:46 AM Post #32 |
|
Legitimist
![]()
|
Would anybody like to live in any of my nations? |
![]() |
|
| Filo | May 31 2006, 01:05 PM Post #33 |
|
General
|
Surely i don't want live in a nazi crazy state... |
![]() |
|
| Tristan da Cunha | May 31 2006, 02:06 PM Post #34 |
|
Science and Industry
|
Lol nice. I'm looking forward to that. And I think you have done a nice job in your RPs conveying the whole atomsphere and distinct "aura" of Nag Ehgoeg, so good for you. In case anyone wants to live in or take a vacation in my countries: Trilateral Commission resembles Fritz Lang's "Metropolis". Antebellum South resembles "Gone With the Wind" and "Littlest Rebel" (the shirley Temple film) Greater Shambala, "Triumph of the Will" and "Olympia". |
![]() |
|
| New Harumf | May 31 2006, 02:28 PM Post #35 |
![]()
Bloodthirsty Unicorn
|
Hmm, I think I'd end up dead in any of those! |
![]() |
|
| Tristan da Cunha | May 31 2006, 02:36 PM Post #36 |
|
Science and Industry
|
I would too. :D |
![]() |
|
| Catholic Europe | May 31 2006, 03:47 PM Post #37 |
|
Spammer
|
And South Africa... |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | May 31 2006, 06:07 PM Post #38 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
I would go to AA...not. :P And South Africa don't sound to bad for me personally. |
![]() |
|
| Wadj | May 31 2006, 08:57 PM Post #39 |
![]()
The Very Model of a Modern Major General
|
Wadj has a huge government welfare system, and more civil liberties than you can shake a stick at. I'd live in Wadj, and I'd love it. Sarawakh is extremely capitalist, with a lot of political freedoms, and moderate civil liberties. Saxe-Coburg is socialist, and more controlling than Wadj. El Imperio Mejicano is an authoritarian dictatorship, but as long as you don't question the system, the government treats you ok. Le Congo Leopold is freaking insane. Don't live there. |
![]() |
|
| Assassin | Jun 1 2006, 04:15 AM Post #40 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Actually, I wouldnt mind living in Henraeld. In all honesty, its not a bad nation. Well, wasnt (pre-nuke). The only really bad thing they have going for them is that A.A. wanted them dead. In actuallity, Henraeld is the opposite of A.A. now. |
![]() |
|
| East Anarx | Jun 1 2006, 12:05 PM Post #41 |
|
Anarchitect
![]()
|
A government powerful enough to give you everything you want is powerful enough to take from from you everything you have. -Gerald Ford |
![]() |
|
| Wadj | Jun 1 2006, 05:36 PM Post #42 |
![]()
The Very Model of a Modern Major General
|
If the Wadji government tried to pull any of the crap the US government has pulled in regards to civil liberties, the populous would go on a rampage of Gandhi-esque civil disobedience. Wadjis don't give up their rights. |
![]() |
|
| East Anarx | Jun 1 2006, 05:38 PM Post #43 |
|
Anarchitect
![]()
|
No no no. Of course Wadjis are a far more freedom-loving race than Americans. What was I thinking? |
![]() |
|
| Wadj | Jun 1 2006, 05:47 PM Post #44 |
![]()
The Very Model of a Modern Major General
|
Damn straight. Americans can be manipulated by their crappy-ass presidents, whereas Wadjis won't take any of that crap. Wadj has been perpetually at war with Scythirus, and the government has not taken away any of their civil liberties. In America you just slap the word "Patriot" onto a bill that severely limits the freedoms given to you by the constitution, and say "If you're not with us, you're with the terrorists" and you can get Americans to do anything you want. |
![]() |
|
| Quaon | Jun 1 2006, 05:59 PM Post #45 |
![]()
A Prince Amoung Men-Shoot First and Ask Questions Later
|
Too true. |
![]() |
|
| Noriega | Jun 1 2006, 06:17 PM Post #46 |
![]()
Resident Hobbit
|
That's the good thing about Norightsians. They fight fiercley to keep rights they don't really have. ^_^ |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2













3:57 AM Jul 11