Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only".

In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
OOC Ideas; Regarding Sinai and Israel
Topic Started: Mar 27 2006, 09:35 PM (629 Views)
Nag Ehgoeg
Member Avatar
The Devil's Advocate

Al Araam
Apr 2 2006, 11:31 AM
Nag Ehgoeg
Apr 1 2006, 12:31 PM
OOC: Oh right, just because I found it I'm the leader  :shy:

Unlike the BP - I have no say over what the IFP/JP does. And Paradise is threatened by Nag Ehgoeg... pull the other one :P :lol:  :rolleyes:

Now we see the IFP's true flaw. While the Baghdad Pact promotes stability and true democracy, the International Freedom Pact promotes anarchy and would do nothing to prevent infighting between its members.

...

And that hasn't been blindly obvious since the start?

This is the League of Nations as far as Project Cooler is concerned.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tristan da Cunha
Member Avatar
Science and Industry
Al Araam
Apr 2 2006, 11:31 AM
Nag Ehgoeg
Apr 1 2006, 12:31 PM
OOC: Oh right, just because I found it I'm the leader  :shy:

Unlike the BP - I have no say over what the IFP/JP does. And Paradise is threatened by Nag Ehgoeg... pull the other one :P :lol:  :rolleyes:

Now we see the IFP's true flaw. While the Baghdad Pact promotes stability and true democracy, the International Freedom Pact promotes anarchy and would do nothing to prevent infighting between its members.

"Paradise is the least democratic nation in the world. Let Al Araam preach democracy to Paradise.

The IFP promotes sovereignty and true stability. The Baghdad Pact promotes subservience to a small oligarchy that controls large oil and military resources. As shown by the Baltuvia incident the BP does not hesitate to bully small weak nations, almost starting a regional war.

The IFP is a defense agreement designed to protect nations who wish to be freed from large, dangerous worldwide power blocs. The BP is a global superpower alliance. And history has shown again and again that the greatest threats to humanity are superpower nations and superpower alliances that are convinced of their own invincibility. Superpowrs are reckless about going to war, since they are always convinced that they will be victorious.

The IFP is a counterweight to the dangerous, deluded superpower mentality of the BP. We will make the BP think twice before attempting to impose their views on other nations, through force or intimidation.

Perhaps Al Araam is proud to be Paradise's lackey and perhaps Al Araam is proud to hide behind Paradise's military power and make threats against the world. But thanks to the IFP, the rest of the world need no longer live in fear of the reckless foreign policies of unpracticed, third-rate BP nations who project their militant delusions on the entire globe."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nag Ehgoeg
Member Avatar
The Devil's Advocate

OOC: Couldn't have put it better myself.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Paradise
Member Avatar
Resident bureaucrat

This was supposed to be a OOC thread :lol:

Well whatever. TC, do you approve the last plan proposed by USOI (the one that gives him access to the Death Sea)?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
United State of Israel
Member Avatar
A Light to the Gentiles
 *  *  *  *  *  *
Paradise
Apr 2 2006, 10:31 PM
This was supposed to be a OOC thread :lol:

Well whatever. TC, do you approve the last plan proposed by USOI (the one that gives him access to the Death Sea)?

The TC stated in the Resolution 591 thread that it wouldn't proceed in the negotiations until the Suez Canal issue is settled.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tristan da Cunha
Member Avatar
Science and Industry
I support establishment of USOI in central Israel according to the rules established by Resolution 591, but no more negotiations after that. THeoretically USOI's last proposal is acceptable but the TC also wants to take a piece of the coast, including Netanya.

Here is the situation so far:

Ignore the "UN" labell. The blue area is USOI.

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
United State of Israel
Member Avatar
A Light to the Gentiles
 *  *  *  *  *  *
You do have a part of the coast - Haifa and Acre.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tristan da Cunha
Member Avatar
Science and Industry
I mean I want a bigger piece of the coast. :) ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
United State of Israel
Member Avatar
A Light to the Gentiles
 *  *  *  *  *  *
Oh, come on... seriously, we have the chance to reach a fair agreement here, let's not screw it up with 5 miles of coast :rolleyes:

You wanted coastal access - you got it. You wanted Northern Israel - you have it under this proposal. You wanted Judea and Samaria, you have them.

These were the main things you wanted. Let's focus on them.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tristan da Cunha
Member Avatar
Science and Industry
I suppose.

Anyways I plan on quickly negotiating and finalizing an official IC settlement starting next weekend (this week I will not be online here that much). I believe the final agreement will resemble USOI's last proposal.

There is however a small chance that I won't do any more negotiations period, due to consideration of the Suez Canal situation. I may want to hold onto Sinai to preserve the TC's leverage in the Suez-Red Sea area, and just ignore the rest of Israel. But I believe there is a large chance we can come to an agreement that partitions Israel that satisfies all sides.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Paradise
Member Avatar
Resident bureaucrat

Posted Image
I thought everyone could agree on this proposal... I mean, TC you're looking mostly for religious sites while USOI is looking mostly for land territory.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Catholic Europe
Member Avatar
Spammer
God! This is still not settled or agreed upon lol!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
« Previous Topic · Middle East · Next Topic »
Add Reply