| This forum is used with the NationStates web-game designed and run by Max Barry. While not officially affiliated, this serves as the regional forum for the regions: Middle East, African Continent, American Continent, Asian Continent, and European Continent. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and can "read only". In order to get the most out of these forums, please become a member and read this guide - http://z3.invisionfree.com/nationstates/index.php?showtopic=3060 If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| OOC Ideas; Regarding Sinai and Israel | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Mar 27 2006, 09:35 PM (629 Views) | |
| Nag Ehgoeg | Apr 2 2006, 11:40 AM Post #51 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
... And that hasn't been blindly obvious since the start? This is the League of Nations as far as Project Cooler is concerned. |
![]() |
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Apr 2 2006, 01:22 PM Post #52 |
|
Science and Industry
|
"Paradise is the least democratic nation in the world. Let Al Araam preach democracy to Paradise. The IFP promotes sovereignty and true stability. The Baghdad Pact promotes subservience to a small oligarchy that controls large oil and military resources. As shown by the Baltuvia incident the BP does not hesitate to bully small weak nations, almost starting a regional war. The IFP is a defense agreement designed to protect nations who wish to be freed from large, dangerous worldwide power blocs. The BP is a global superpower alliance. And history has shown again and again that the greatest threats to humanity are superpower nations and superpower alliances that are convinced of their own invincibility. Superpowrs are reckless about going to war, since they are always convinced that they will be victorious. The IFP is a counterweight to the dangerous, deluded superpower mentality of the BP. We will make the BP think twice before attempting to impose their views on other nations, through force or intimidation. Perhaps Al Araam is proud to be Paradise's lackey and perhaps Al Araam is proud to hide behind Paradise's military power and make threats against the world. But thanks to the IFP, the rest of the world need no longer live in fear of the reckless foreign policies of unpracticed, third-rate BP nations who project their militant delusions on the entire globe." |
![]() |
|
| Nag Ehgoeg | Apr 2 2006, 01:32 PM Post #53 |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]()
|
OOC: Couldn't have put it better myself. |
![]() |
|
| Paradise | Apr 2 2006, 02:31 PM Post #54 |
![]()
Resident bureaucrat
![]()
|
This was supposed to be a OOC thread :lol: Well whatever. TC, do you approve the last plan proposed by USOI (the one that gives him access to the Death Sea)? |
![]() |
|
| United State of Israel | Apr 2 2006, 02:36 PM Post #55 |
|
A Light to the Gentiles
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The TC stated in the Resolution 591 thread that it wouldn't proceed in the negotiations until the Suez Canal issue is settled. |
![]() |
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Apr 2 2006, 02:39 PM Post #56 |
|
Science and Industry
|
I support establishment of USOI in central Israel according to the rules established by Resolution 591, but no more negotiations after that. THeoretically USOI's last proposal is acceptable but the TC also wants to take a piece of the coast, including Netanya. Here is the situation so far: Ignore the "UN" labell. The blue area is USOI. Posted Image |
![]() |
|
| United State of Israel | Apr 2 2006, 02:49 PM Post #57 |
|
A Light to the Gentiles
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You do have a part of the coast - Haifa and Acre. |
![]() |
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Apr 2 2006, 02:51 PM Post #58 |
|
Science and Industry
|
I mean I want a bigger piece of the coast. :) ;) |
![]() |
|
| United State of Israel | Apr 2 2006, 02:57 PM Post #59 |
|
A Light to the Gentiles
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh, come on... seriously, we have the chance to reach a fair agreement here, let's not screw it up with 5 miles of coast :rolleyes: You wanted coastal access - you got it. You wanted Northern Israel - you have it under this proposal. You wanted Judea and Samaria, you have them. These were the main things you wanted. Let's focus on them. |
![]() |
|
| Tristan da Cunha | Apr 2 2006, 03:03 PM Post #60 |
|
Science and Industry
|
I suppose. Anyways I plan on quickly negotiating and finalizing an official IC settlement starting next weekend (this week I will not be online here that much). I believe the final agreement will resemble USOI's last proposal. There is however a small chance that I won't do any more negotiations period, due to consideration of the Suez Canal situation. I may want to hold onto Sinai to preserve the TC's leverage in the Suez-Red Sea area, and just ignore the rest of Israel. But I believe there is a large chance we can come to an agreement that partitions Israel that satisfies all sides. |
![]() |
|
| Paradise | Apr 2 2006, 03:24 PM Post #61 |
![]()
Resident bureaucrat
![]()
|
Posted Image I thought everyone could agree on this proposal... I mean, TC you're looking mostly for religious sites while USOI is looking mostly for land territory. |
![]() |
|
| Catholic Europe | Apr 2 2006, 06:39 PM Post #62 |
|
Spammer
|
God! This is still not settled or agreed upon lol! |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Middle East · Next Topic » |









9:12 AM Jul 11