Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Nintendo Wars. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
Some complaints I have about you people.
Topic Started: May 6 2012, 11:09:27 PM (528 Views)
TheFinalEnigma
Member Avatar
Prettiest Princess
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Lordberfer00, allow me to introduce myself. I'm one of the victims of your patronizing, carnaptious subliminal psywar campaigns. As a note of explanation for other readers of this letter: It's perverted know-it-alls like Lordberfer00 that inspire a recrudescence of biased fatuity. Please note that many of the conclusions I'm about to draw are based on cogent and virtually incontrovertible evidence provided by a set of people who have suffered immensely on account of him.

So remember kids, if you want to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community, all you have to do is agree to let Lordberfer00 embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians. As a consistently mortified observer of his escapades, I can't help but want to face our problems realistically, get to the root of our problems, and be determined to solve them. His expositors are capable of little else but hating and lying, even to each other. Let's remember that. Lordberfer00 doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. He has long been getting away with reinforcing the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. I urge all of my beautiful and loyal fans to walk with me side-by-side as we march up the steps of justice to right this unconscionable wrong and prove to the world that Lordberfer00's statements such as "The rigors that Lordberfer00's victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual.

I can no longer brook Lordberfer00's rude rodomontades, and I'm not making that up! Daily, the truth is being impressed upon us that we mustn't be content to patch and darn, to piece and cobble at the worn and rotten fabric of Lordberfer00's irrational, eccentric adages. Instead we must contribute to the intellectual and spiritual health of the body politic. Lordberfer00 and I disagree about our civic duties. I insist that we must do our utmost to perform noble deeds. Lordberfer00, on the other hand, believes that all it takes to start a rabbit farm is a magician's magic hat. Let me conclude by saying that we who want to open minds instead of closing them will not rest until we do.
Spoiler: click to toggle


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheFinalEnigma
Member Avatar
Prettiest Princess
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
My entire life I have been taught to stand up for my beliefs, to be a person of high morals and ethics. That's why I feel obligated to challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations. To start, TheGamerGod333's trapped in a vicious cycle. The more opposition to his hariolations he faces, the more imprudent he becomes. The more imprudent he becomes, the more opposition to his hariolations he faces.

TheGamerGod333 has repeatedly been spotted creating a factitious demand for his picayunish taradiddles. When questioned about that, he either denies any knowledge of it or offers unbelievable and ludicrous explanations that only a brown-nosing blackguard could believe. I might add: We are starting to witness the unbalanced effects of his plans for the future. Of that I am certain because if I were a complete sap, I'd believe his line that women are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras. Unfortunately for him, I realize that TheGamerGod333 has separate, oftentimes antipodal, interests from ours. For instance, he's intererested in fostering zabernism at every opportunity. In contrast, my interests—and perhaps yours as well—include telling people that I am interested in facts, not in paregoric for TheGamerGod333's buddies. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that TheGamerGod333's penchant for obscurantism chokes his judgment like tea leaves blocking a sink?

TheGamerGod333 shouldn't sentence more and more people to poverty, prison, and early death. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed. His toadies are often caught trying to exert more and more control over other individuals. Of course, they deny this but we all know full well that he has stated that he's an expert on everything from aardvarks to zymurgy. I find such declaratory statements quite telling. They tell me that if you don't think that TheGamerGod333 is not above the law, then you've missed the whole point of this letter.

It seems ironic that TheGamerGod333's genius for crime, squalor, and disorder has once again asserted itself, given that he keeps saying that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. For some reason, TheGamerGod333's spokesmen actually believe this nonsense. Courage is what we need to reveal the nature and activity of TheGamerGod333's attendants and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims—not politeness, not intellectual flair, not cleverness with words, just courage. And it sometimes takes a lot of courage to look a sexist conspiracy theorist in the eye and tell him that if I want to wander around in a quagmire of self-pity and depression, that should be my prerogative. I don't need TheGamerGod333 forcing me to. Did it ever occur to him that we have a number of problems for which he bears most of the responsibility? First, I'll give you a very brief answer, and then I'll go back and explain my answer in detail. As for the brief answer, a great many of us don't want him to turn over our country to unbridled, tyrannical mooks. Still, we feel a prodigious pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to his salacious magic-bullet explanations.

TheGamerGod333 is a financial predator who preys on the elderly, the gullible, and the vulnerable. He seeks their assets to support his own lavish lifestyle. Keep that in mind while I state the following: I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why what really irks me is that TheGamerGod333 has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him make mountains out of molehills or he'll fan the flames of onanism into a planet-spanning inferno.

TheGamerGod333 says that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. Although TheGamerGod333 clearly cut that statement out of whole cloth, he is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, TheGamerGod333 frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to put beggarly thoughts in our children's minds. Maybe it's not fair to call his adherents "directionless" just because they condition the public to accept violence as normal and desirable, but remember that he has been deluding people into believing that the existence and perpetuation of separatism is its own moral justification. Don't let him delude you, too.

I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: I am not trying to save the world—I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to embrace diversity.

It saddens me that TheGamerGod333's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are his promises. In fact, I've been rolling up my sleeves in preparation for a long, hard battle against liberticidal pronks. To say anything else would be a lie. I oppose TheGamerGod333's editorials because they are hideous. I oppose them because they are slaphappy. And I oppose them because they will give an air of scientific impartiality to biased judgments before long.

Difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to renew those institutions of civil society—like families, schools, churches, and civic groups—that take the initiative to discuss, openly and candidly, a vision for a harmonious, multiracial society. TheGamerGod333's long-term goal is to poke and pry into every facet of our lives. I hate to break it to him, but down that path lies only heartache and tears. That's why I insist on mentioning that the most significant aspect of TheGamerGod333's mentality and its lack of refinement is the closeness of TheGamerGod333's way of thinking in general to the way that disdainful, shambolic carnaptious-types think in particular. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, TheGamerGod333's monographs are eerily similar to those promoted by madmen such as Pol Pot. What's scary, though, is that their extollment of masochism has been ratcheted up a few notches from anything Pol Pot ever conjured up.

Because not everyone agrees with TheGamerGod333, it therefore stands to reason that superficial hippies are more susceptible to his brainwashing tactics than are any other group. Like water, their minds take the form of whatever receptacle TheGamerGod333 puts them in. They then lose all recollection that TheGamerGod333 has called people like me crabby quiddlers, brainless recreants, and arrogant blackguards so many times that these accusations no longer have any sting. TheGamerGod333 decidedly continues to employ such insults because he's run out of logical arguments. I suppose an alternate explanation is that this is not a question of communism or Fabianism. Rather, it is a question about how I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival. In a nutshell, I can no longer brook TheGamerGod333's stubborn pleas.
Spoiler: click to toggle


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheFinalEnigma
Member Avatar
Prettiest Princess
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to TheBurrowingHippo's contentious schemes. Perhaps before going on, I should describe TheBurrowingHippo to you. TheBurrowingHippo is pernicious, venom-spouting, and vindictive. Furthermore, he yearns to make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. He has been going around saying that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy. That's a bit of a furphy. The truth is that you should not ask, "Why do we put up with TheBurrowingHippo?" but rather, "Where do primitive Fagins like TheBurrowingHippo come from, and what are we going to do with them?". The latter question is the better one to ask because contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to do something good for others.

There is no doubt that TheBurrowingHippo will separate people from their roots and cut their bonds to their natural communities some day. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that TheBurrowingHippo has announced a number of spiteful ideas on how to run—or is that ruin?—everyone's life. For proof of this fact I must point out that when TheBurrowingHippo's commentaries are challenged, he usually responds by forcing square pegs into round holes. Well, you can't really expect him to defend his positions with facts, explanations, logical arguments, or even references to events that occurred less than two years ago, can you? Look at what's happened since TheBurrowingHippo first ordered his cat's-paws to torment, harry, and persecute anyone who crosses his path: Views once considered backwards are now considered ordinary. Views once considered empty-headed are now considered perfectly normal. And the most worthless of TheBurrowingHippo's views are now seen as gospel by legions of what I call rash pillocks.

Remaining silent and inactive in the face of TheBurrowingHippo's soliloquies negates our duty as civilized members of the community. I'll go further: I can reword my point as follows. TheBurrowingHippo's trucklers are suckers for rallying chants, regurgitated, standardized slogans, and other behavioral reinforcements. A few days ago, TheBurrowingHippo actually admitted that he wants to create a regime of offensive presentism. Can you believe that? Perhaps TheBurrowingHippo forgot to take his antipsychotics that day. An additional clue is that he has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever he thinks that means) to prove that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says mudslinging things. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that TheBurrowingHippo's grandiose narcissism serves as his primary defense against shame. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that the cure for evil is more evil, then there is certainly no hope for you.

So remember kids, if you want to foster suspicion—if not hatred—of "outsiders", all you have to do is agree to let TheBurrowingHippo hold annual private conferences in which featherbrained fomenters of revolution are invited to present their "research". Over time, his belief systems have progressed from being merely maladroit to being supermaladroit, hypermaladroit, and recently ultramaladroit. In fact, I'd say that now they're even megamaladroit. Don't be intimidated by his threat to turn knaves loose against us good citizens. Peccable, intransigent scroungers are often found at TheBurrowingHippo's elbow. This suggests to me that TheBurrowingHippo is an inspiration to meretricious ingrates everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to anesthetize the human spirit, and, more importantly, they don't realize that knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that TheBurrowingHippo does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when he says that pauperism is a sine qua non for mankind's happiness, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.

Rather than persuade you myself that I take seriously the view that I don't think it is a mere coincidence that TheBurrowingHippo prefers "Fisking"—line-by-line rebuttals in which facts are dropped like radar chaff—to rational debate or building a coherent argument, I decided to gather input from various independent observers: teachers, farmers, shopkeepers, doctors, and so forth. I've tried to get balanced and reasonably accurate views about TheBurrowingHippo's dour rodomontades. For instance, a policeman I interviewed pointed out how by refusing to act, by refusing to bring TheBurrowingHippo to justice, we are giving TheBurrowingHippo the power to "solve" all our problems by talking them to death. He insists that birdbrained gomerals should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers. Has anyone, at any time, ever been more wrong? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: TheBurrowingHippo presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. He is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors abhorrent twits. And here we have the ultimate irony because it's not necessarily difficult to make pretentiousness unfashionable. We can begin simply by making some changes here. See? I told you it wasn't necessarily difficult. We just need to remember that TheBurrowingHippo and his conveniently bribed allies have been feeding information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly materialistic agendas. As bad as that is, it represents only the thin end of the wedge. In a matter of days, TheBurrowingHippo will likely put some dissolute, stingy present-day robber baron up on a pedestal.

TheBurrowingHippo likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why when I was a child my clergyman told me, "Much can be learned about TheBurrowingHippo by understanding unsophisticated masochism." If you think about it you'll see his point. He's known for ripping apart causes that others feel strongly about. This is not only a grotesque betrayal of the principles that TheBurrowingHippo himself claims to uphold but a clear demonstration of how one can usually be pretty sure when TheBurrowingHippo is lying. Sometimes there's a little doubt: maybe it's not a deliberate lie but merely a difference of opinion. But when TheBurrowingHippo claims that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight, there's no room for ambiguity: he's unmistakably lying.

People like TheBurrowingHippo are beyond help. Added to this is something else: Many innocent people are being manipulated into promoting a herd mentality over principled, individual thought by the most sickening display of cranky cant that I have ever witnessed in my entire life. We are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what TheBurrowingHippo does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why if TheBurrowingHippo thinks that his tirades prevent smallpox, then he's sadly mistaken. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, but he uses the very intellectual tools he criticizes, namely consequentialist arguments rather than arguments about truth or falsity. At any rate, TheBurrowingHippo spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue he's excited about this week is totalism, which says to me that groupthink and mob behavior are common within TheBurrowingHippo's junta. Hence, it isn't unusual for one who commits heresy against TheBurrowingHippo's established dogma to be exiled from the community. The sad part is that these outcasts still refuse to believe that sometime in the future TheBurrowingHippo will arouse the hostility and excite the cupidity of the worst classes of two-faced malignant-types I've ever seen. Fortunately, that hasn't happened…yet. But it will indisputably happen if we don't purge the darkness from TheBurrowingHippo's heart.

It would be great if we could encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish. Still, if we take a step, just a step, towards addressing the issue of Marxism, then maybe we can open people's eyes (including our own) to a vision of how to rise above the narrow confines of self-existence to the broader concerns of all humanity. There are three fairly obvious problems with TheBurrowingHippo's precepts, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to tamp down any doubts that no one—except TheBurrowingHippo, so high on his own hallucinations that he believes them to be real—can seriously believe that the existence and perpetuation of racialism is its own moral justification. First, the fabric of his monographs is infused with nettlesome simplism. Second, he believes, in his elitist delirium, that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to open new avenues for the expression of hate. And third, I know some spineless nobodies who actually believe that all literature that opposes jingoism was forged by wanton cheapjacks. Incredible? Those same people have told me that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that TheBurrowingHippo should be even slightly inconvenienced. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that his cantankerous sycophants like to shout, "Let's pose a threat to the survival of democracy. That'll be wonderful. Hooray, hooray!" But that won't be wonderful. Rather, it'll detach people from their morally established systems of belief.

This raises another important point: There is unquestionably a rambunctious dimension to TheBurrowingHippo's codices. Or, if "rambunctious" is too narrow of a term, perhaps you'd prefer "thrasonical". In any case, TheBurrowingHippo maintains that either truth is merely a social construct or that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the saturnine hands of ruthless quodlibetarians. TheBurrowingHippo denies any other possibility. He doesn't simply want people to believe that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. He wants this belief drummed into people's heads from birth. He wants it to be accepted as an axiom, an assumed part of the nature of reality. Only then will TheBurrowingHippo truly be able to get away with marginalizing and eventually even outlawing responsible critics of what I call headlong, perverted goofballs.

I would rail on at length about TheBurrowingHippo's wayward, grumpy methods of interpretation but will leave that for another time. Suffice it to say that I would like to comment on TheBurrowingHippo's attempt to associate propagandism with Fabianism. There is no association. To summarize what I've written up to this point, it would be better for TheBurrowingHippo to do nothing than to turn positions of leadership into positions of complacency. You know I'm right. Now what are you going to do about it?
Spoiler: click to toggle


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
General Guy
Member Avatar
Cett
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
An essay on my friend Steve's face

I shall now enrich your life by sharing with you about my friend Steve's face. Advancments in my friend Steve's face can be linked to many areas. While it has been acknowledged that it has an important part to play in the development of man, it is yet to receive proper recognition for laying the foundations of democracy. Inevitably my friend Steve's face is often misunderstood by those politicaly minded individuals living in the past, whom I can say no more about due to legal restrictions. Though I would rather be in bed I will now examine the primary causes of my friend Steve's face.

Social Factors

While some scholars have claimed that there is no such thing as society, this is rubbish. When Lance Bandaner said 'twelve times I've traversed the ocean of youthful ambition but society still collects my foot prints' [1] he created a monster which society has been attempting to tame ever since. No symbol is more potent than my friend Steve's face in society today. It smells of success.

Some analysts have been tempted to disregard my friend Steve's face. I haven’t. Clearly it promotes higher individualism and obeyence of instinct. As soon as a child meets my friend Steve's face they are changed.

Economic Factors

There has been a great deal of discussion in the world of economics, centred on the value of my friend Steve's face. We shall examine the Maiden-Tuesday-Lending model, a complex but ultimately rewarding system. Interest
Posted Image
my friend Steve's face


It is apparent from the graph that the influence of my friend Steve's face is strong. What is the secret to its strength? My personal view is that interest looms over my friend Steve's face this cannot be a coincidence. The financial press seems unable to make up its mind on these issues which unsettles investors.

Political Factors

Politics - smolitics! Comparing current political thought with that held just ten years ago is like comparing the two, equally popular approaches to my friend Steve's face. If the reader is unaware of these, they need only to turn on the television, or pick up a newspaper or popular magazine.

Take a moment to consider the words of jazz singer Xaviera B. Adger 'political change changes politics, but where does it go?' [2] Primarily, he is referring to my friend Steve's face. Both spectacular failure and unequaled political accomplishment may be accredited to my friend Steve's face.
Why did my friend Steve's face cross the road? - To get to the other side! Just my little joke, but lets hope that my friend Steve's face doesn't inspire similar hilarity in the next elections.

Conclusion

We can conclude that the my friend Steve's face may not be the best thing since sliced bread, but it's still important. It replenishes the self, influences the influencers, and never hides.

I'll leave you with this quote from Whoopi Garfunkel: 'I wouldn't be where I am today without my friend Steve's face.'
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheFinalEnigma
Member Avatar
Prettiest Princess
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Before LordRaymond starts ripping tendons and ligaments with his typical knee-jerk reaction to my letters, he should realize that he should get with the program. One of my objectives for this letter is to open minds instead of closing them. I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke him for trying to impale us on the pike of Leninism. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, LordRaymond yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for LordRaymond, "attracting attention" usually implies "elevating contentious rakes to the sublime". Are you still with me?

All that we have achieved may now be lost, if not in the bright flames of insurrectionism then in the dense smoke of the uneducated warnings promoted by delirious, violent thieves. You don't have to say anything specifically about LordRaymond for him to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should bring him down a peg.

LordRaymond promotes a victimization hierarchy. He and his torchbearers appear at the top of the hierarchy, naturally, and therefore assert that they deserve to be given more money, support, power, etc. than anyone else. Other groups, depending on LordRaymond's view of them, are further down the list. At the bottom are those of us who realize that LordRaymond's latest diatribe is LordRaymond-style lunacy at its very finest. Every despicable word of that diatribe paints a perfect picture of LordRaymond's hysteria and reveals that we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about LordRaymond's evil ethics. For starters, let's say that "antipluralism" is "that which makes LordRaymond yearn to fragment the nation into politically disharmonious units."

You may balk at this, but LordRaymond's companions want so much to quash other people's opinions that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up—and LordRaymond knows it. I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with LordRaymond and his spokesmen, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that if LordRaymond thinks his bruta fulmina represent progress, he should rethink his definition of progress.

As subversive as LordRaymond's brethren may be, they are also conniving, sexist nymphomaniacs. If you observe some repetition in my statements, it is because such repetition is needed for clarity and emphasis as I take the initiative to change the direction in which our society is headed. LordRaymond doesn't have any principles, or if he does, he puts them aside whenever they're inconvenient. He had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, LordRaymond gave us ultraism, totalism, and simplism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since LordRaymond says that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that everyone and everything discriminates against him—including the writing on the bathroom stalls.

If we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to debate the efficacy of LordRaymond's temulent, nit-picky litanies. I myself unequivocally avouch that LordRaymond is a foolhardy franion. How else can I characterize a person who did all of the following and then some?

1. Carve out space in the mainstream for hidebound politics
2. Court a pouty minority of the most unbalanced spoilsports you'll ever see
3. Persuade many of his nemeses to enter into a one-way "dialogue" with him

I could lengthen this list, but I shall rest my case. The point is that if I didn't think LordRaymond would inject his lethal poison into our children's minds and souls, I wouldn't say that his ideas would have more impact if they were more concise and organized. Instead of trying to be as clear as possible to get his point across, LordRaymond seems to like bandying about all types of fancy terms that no one's ever heard and that completely diminish his point.

LordRaymond's "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude is termagant because it leaves no room for compromise. I apologize if what I'm saying sounds painfully obvious, painfully self-evident. However, it is so extremely important that I must definitely say it. Although LordRaymond would rather I discuss the personality flaws of unwed, pregnant teenagers, he has been advocating measures that others criticize for being excessively purblind. It's time to even the score. I suggest that we begin by notifying people of the fact that LordRaymond swears that it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to lobotomize everyone caught thinking an independent thought. Clearly, he's living in a world of make-believe, with flowers and bells and leprechauns and magic frogs with funny little hats. Back in the real world, LordRaymond would have us believe that his tricks are the carriers of civilization and that without them history is silent, literature is dumb, science is crippled, and thought and speculation are at a standstill. The reality, in contrast, is that LordRaymond's view is that everything is happy and fine and good. If LordRaymond's meddlesome satraps had any moral or intellectual training, such a position would doubtlessly be rendered revolting to their better feelings.

One of LordRaymond's favorite tricks is to create a problem, then offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to resort to ad hominem attacks on me and my family, never the original problem. LordRaymond tries to make us think the way he wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons. It has been said that he reads magazines that feature the disrespect, degradation, dehumanization, and exploitation of women and their bodies. I, in turn, claim that he ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:

Fact: He's so accustomed to lying about everything that he doesn't even stop to consider the consequences of his lies.

Fact: I have never read reasoning more absurd or sophistry more gross than that used by him to convince people that you and I are objects for him to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings.

Fact: If we submit to his definition of "nondeterministic" and become picayunish, we have lost the war for self-preservation.

In addition, his programs of Gleichschaltung are not witty satire, as LordRaymond would have you believe. They're simply the imprudent, primitive ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what he's mocking.

Despite what you may have been taught in school, LordRaymond's crotchets will cause more harm than good. He vehemently denies that, of course. But he obviously would because he does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, LordRaymond discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent.

I have only two questions. First, why does LordRaymond serve as a lobbyist for those who have so grossly sidestepped our laws? Second—and I shouldn't even have to ask this question but will for those of you who have been napping—is LordRaymond so anal-retentive as to think that this can go on forever? There are some truths that are so obvious that for this very reason they are not seen, or at least not recognized, by ordinary people. One noteworthy example is the truism that we're all in this mess together. Hence and therefore, I'm not very conversant with LordRaymond's background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to help you reflect and reexamine your views on LordRaymond, we must deliver new information about his backwards conjectures. I consider that requirement a small price to pay because LordRaymond's functionaries resist seeing that whenever I hear someone say that honor counts for nothing, my upper lip develops an involuntary curl. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within LordRaymond's pea-sized brain. It is high time for someone to tell you things that LordRaymond doesn't want you to know. Will that someone be you?
Edited by TheFinalEnigma, May 6 2012, 11:12:21 PM.
Spoiler: click to toggle


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheFinalEnigma
Member Avatar
Prettiest Princess
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
There is currently a lot of controversy about Fordicon98's witticisms, and I know that any letter on the subject will almost certainly cause someone to resort to ad hominem attacks on me and my family. Still, relative even to the most pertinacious megalomaniacs you'll ever see, Fordicon98 is more excitable, more violent, less sexually restrained, more impulsive, more prone to crime, less altruistic, less inclined to follow rules, and less cooperative. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care—a large enough number to act honorably. Nettlesome wankers are more susceptible to his brainwashing tactics than are any other group. Like water, their minds take the form of whatever receptacle Fordicon98 puts them in. They then lose all recollection that the unalterable law of biology has a corollary that is generally overlooked. Specifically, I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like Fordicon98 let down ladders that the power-drunk, cacodemonic, and base-minded scramble to climb. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world.

Fordicon98 likes to brag about how the members of his coterie are ideologically diverse. Perhaps that means that some of them prefer Stalin over Hitler. In any case, Fordicon98's use of the term "anthropomorphologically" displays, at best, a tone deafness. The term drips with echoes of Zendicism and warns us all that Fordicon98 seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, slatternly euphuists. Please note that when I finish writing this letter you might not hear from me again for a while. I simply don't have enough strength left to declare a truce with Fordicon98 and commence a dialogue. Nevertheless, it is mathematically provable that you should never allow a day to go by in which you do not bring this fundamental truth to at least one new person. I'm not actually familiar with the proof for that statement and wouldn't understand it even if it were shown to me, but it seems very believable based upon my experience. What's also quite believable is that I myself don't need to tell you that the best gauge of the value of my attitudes, the sincerity of my convictions, and the force of my will is the hostility I receive from rambunctious haggersnashes. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to arraign Fordicon98 at the tribunal of public opinion. Of course, were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be his most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with Fordicon98 to help him clear-cut ancient forest lands.

It's really amazing, isn't it? We can put people on the Moon and send robot explorers to Mars, but Fordicon98's myopic form of hooliganism is like a forest fire. Once it is started, none can set bounds to the resulting conflagration. The only option is to build a sane and healthy society free of Fordicon98's destructive influences. While doing so won't put a stop to hooliganism, it will demonstrate decisively that I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival.

Did you hear what Fordicon98 recently said about materialism? Never before has an obdurate loon so cleverly hidden in plain sight his intention to crucify us on the cross of savagism. The intent of this letter is certainly not hatred but a probing look into an obviously significant issue. That's self-evident, and even Fordicon98 would probably agree with me on that. Even so, if his appalling inveracities became more widespread, it would spell the ruination of this country. He has been bamboozling people into believing that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. That's just a tiny facet of what all of us will face if we let him spawn a society in which those with the most deviant lifestyle, sanguinolent behavior, or personal failures are given the most by the government.

What's interesting is that Fordicon98 wants all of us to believe that oligophrenic tricksters should be given absolute authority to plunge us into the dark abyss of annihilation. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. Everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of Fordicon98". In it, I chronicle all of Fordicon98's ploys from the prodigal to the sappy and conclude that when I observe Fordicon98's janissaries' behavior, I can't help but recall the proverbial expression, "monkey see, monkey do". That's because, like him, they all want to maintain social control by eliminating rights and freedoms. Also, while a monkey might think that it's okay if Fordicon98's causeries initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend, the fact remains that if you were to tell him that he's known for selectively editing quotes to make it sound like representative government is an outmoded system that should be replaced by a system of overt gangsterism, he'd just pull his security blanket a little tighter around himself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. I like to say that giving Fordicon98 the means to wage a clandestine guerilla war against many basic human rights is like supplying the gun to your own robber. Fordicon98 never directly acknowledges such truisms but instead tries to turn them around to make it sound like I'm saying that he has a "special" perspective on solecism that carries with it a "special" right to use every conceivable form of diplomacy, deception, pressure, coercion, bribery, treason, and terror to inculcate footling asseverations. I guess that version better fits his style—or should I say, "agenda"?

Fordicon98 has been trying to convince us that it's linguacious to serve on the side of Truth. That argument fails to take into account the reality that if Fordicon98 had done his homework, he'd know that he is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient. But when it threatens his creature comforts, he throws principle to the wind. I definitely hate having to keep reminding everybody of this, but Fordicon98 says that he needs a little more time to clean up his act. As far as I'm concerned, Fordicon98's time has run out. His attempts to caricature and stereotype people from other cultures are much worse than mere deconstructionism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. Fordicon98's view is that he acts in the name of equality and social justice. If Fordicon98's unpleasant, boisterous satellites had any moral or intellectual training, such a position would surely be rendered revolting to their better feelings.

Now, I don't want to overwork the story about how Fordicon98 plans to silence any criticism of the brainwashing and double standards that he has increasingly been practicing, so let's just say that once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that I suppose it's predictable, though terribly sad, that sneaky dopeheads with stronger voices than minds would revert to vindictive behavior. But every time Fordicon98 utters or writes a statement that supports militarism—even indirectly—it sends a message that mandarinism resonates with the body's natural alpha waves. I decidedly feel that we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because incomprehensible, procacious crybabies, more than any other segment of the population, like to subvert existing lines of power and information, but primarily because he wants to regulate rowdyism. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom then you should be working with me to communicate and teach.

All that we have achieved may now be lost, if not in the bright flames of opportunism then in the dense smoke of the illiberal adages promoted by wild, wayward ignoramuses. Although I'm trying desperately hard to express my opinion of Fordicon98 without using expletives, I'm afraid I do have to say that that's just one side of the coin. The other side is that we must really provide an atmosphere of mutual respect, free from mercantalism, moral relativism, and all other forms of prejudice and intolerance. A compossible option is to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. If we follow that approach, however, we must bear in mind that most members of our quick-fix, sugar-rush, attention-deficit society are too impatient to realize the importance of redefining in practical terms the immutable ideals that have guided us from the beginning. I wish only that a few more people could see that there are two classes of people in this world. There are those who redefine humanity as alienated machines/beasts and then convince everyone that they were never human to begin with, and there are those who strike at the heart of his efforts to tap into the national resurgence of overt classism. Fordicon98 fits neatly into the former category, of course.

Here's an extraordinary paradox: All of the aberrant flimflammers who shouldn't be allowed to pursue a philopolemical, bloodthirsty agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever invariably want to. I had a brief conversation recently with some loquacious scaramouches who were trying to rouse the agitated petite bourgeoisie to chauvinistic fervor and hoodwink them into yielding this country to the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny. That conversation convinced me that given the amount of misinformation that Fordicon98 is circulating, I must point out that sometime in the future he will transform fear and its inculcation into the preeminent force ruling human existence. Fortunately, that hasn't happened…yet. But it will truly happen if we don't bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate.

Fordicon98 is honestly up to something. I don't know exactly what, but he doesn't want us to know about his plans to reap a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases. Otherwise, we might do something about that. When he hears anyone say that the more pressing news is that the hostility and boredom he is experiencing internally is quite evident externally, his answer is to impact public policy for years to come. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to criticize the obvious incongruities presented by him and his henchmen. Fordicon98 might have been in a lethargic state of autointoxication when he said that his sophistries are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. More likely, perhaps, is that Fordicon98 is absolutely determined to believe that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Fordicon98 doesn't believe in the right to free speech, except for people who agree with him. That's all I have to say. Thank you for reading this letter.
Spoiler: click to toggle


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheFinalEnigma
Member Avatar
Prettiest Princess
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
I want to share some facts with you. These are hidden truths that affect us all. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: NienBarkNobi's cold, analytical approach to Leninism doesn't take into account the human element. In particular, those who have been hurt by Leninism know that merciless, insipid ragamuffins ought to be worshipping at a higher altar than the bottom line of a balance sheet. We can therefore extrapolate that NienBarkNobi really shouldn't pooh-pooh the concerns of others. That's just common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate his philosophies are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity.

I thought it couldn't be done, but, once again, NienBarkNobi's statements have sunk to a new low. The pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to snap NienBarkNobi's eulogists out of their trance? NienBarkNobi spouts all kinds of puffery about his moral vigor. Well, sure, he has somehow found the fortitude to endure our ongoing humiliation and discomfort at the hands of his satraps, but the larger point is that you may have noticed that there is little doubt that NienBarkNobi has little respect for laws or for any behavior that most people would consider requisite for a sustainable information economy. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, NienBarkNobi's admirers are merely ciphers. NienBarkNobi is the one who decides whether or not to perpetuate misguided and questionable notions of other scurrilous fault-finders' intentions. NienBarkNobi is the one who gives out the orders to prime the pump of Titoism. And NienBarkNobi is the one trying to conceal how if he would abandon his name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to think outside the box.

NienBarkNobi has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." If anything, it's easy to tell if he's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying. Even NienBarkNobi's stooges are afraid that NienBarkNobi will introduce a zeitgeist of denominationalism to our society before you know it. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that I undoubtedly hope you're not being misled by the "new NienBarkNobi". Only his methods and tactics have changed. NienBarkNobi's goal is still the same: to utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to dupe people into believing that all it takes to start a rabbit farm is a magician's magic hat. That's why I'm telling you that NienBarkNobi's apocrisiaries believe that we're supposed to shut up and smile when NienBarkNobi says blasphemous, cold-blooded things. Sorry, guys, but the inconvenient truth is that NienBarkNobi expects us to behave like passive sheep. The only choice he believes we should be allowed to make for ourselves is whether to head towards his slaughterhouse at a trot or at a gallop. NienBarkNobi truly doesn't want us choosing to drag him in front of a tribunal and try him for his crimes against humanity.

NienBarkNobi argues that women are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: He's operating according to some very badly flawed logic—and NienBarkNobi knows it. He has for a long time been arguing that his brownshirt brigade is looking out for our interests. Had he instead been arguing that this makes his bunco games seem doctrinaire and even a bit fatuitous, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in NienBarkNobi's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how anyone—you or I or a Martian who just arrived in a flying saucer—who wants to analyze his reports in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion should realize that he is so confident in his own intellectual and cultural paradigm that he is blind to global realities. It's that simple.

There is a format NienBarkNobi should follow for his next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. We must do everything we can to let him know, in no uncertain terms, that his subliminal psywar campaigns will come back to bite us in the behind one day. Fortunately, developing a rational-empirical base for dialogue about NienBarkNobi's cock-and-bull stories is an activity that's right in my wheelhouse. I even know where to begin: by informing people everywhere that he has been trying to trick people into believing that his tricks are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. Apparently, he has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams with delirious malingerers; they're now fully convinced that NienBarkNobi is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. The purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how intransigent and stultiloquent he has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how if anyone should propose a practical scheme for following knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought, I should be quite disposed to incur almost any degree of expense to accomplish that object. In the meantime, let me point out that I have to wonder where NienBarkNobi got the idea that it is my view that honor counts for nothing. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is.

This is not the first time I've wanted to teach mudslinging loan sharks about tolerance. But it is the first time I realized that it's irritable, jackbooted despots that make atrabilious fainéantism possible. The logical consequences of that are clear: I think I know why so many yellow-bellied present-day robber barons quash other people's opinions. It's because NienBarkNobi has whipped them into a blind frenzy by telling them that he values our perspectives. Unfortunately for NienBarkNobi, the ground truth is that when a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, NienBarkNobi is drunk with power, which is why we must establish beyond a shred of doubt that the comparison between him and impertinent slubberdegullions is remarkable.

So, what am I doing about that? I'm educating. I'm trying to lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. I act based on what I think is right, not who I think is right. That's why I try always to open minds instead of closing them. It's also why I say that I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on his part to flout all of society's rules by next weekend. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that NienBarkNobi fails to comprehend and practice the teachings of his religion. More precisely, he conveniently forgets his religion's messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgiveness—or, at best, misremembers them as an edict to extend his fifteen minutes of fame to fifteen months.

I have a message for all you lazy cunctators out there: Get off your behinds and start removing the misunderstanding that NienBarkNobi has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world. Why is it so important to do that? Because NienBarkNobi's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of NienBarkNobi's grunts, who loudly proclaim that might makes right. Regardless of those garrulous proclamations, the truth is that he insists that he has achieved sainthood. Has anyone, at any time, ever been more wrong? The answer is almost entirely obvious—this isn't rocket science, you know. The key is that NienBarkNobi is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, he operates under cover of self-created screen. NienBarkNobi seizes in his long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection.

I find NienBarkNobi's suggestions rather niddering, don't you? I have absolutely no idea why NienBarkNobi makes such a big fuss over Chekism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved—issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that NienBarkNobi recently stated that he has the trappings of deity. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary because he often argues that he's a moral exemplar. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known dirtbag and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that I, for one, cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for NienBarkNobi's subterfuge. I'm totally stunned.

The real question here is not, "When will NienBarkNobi come clean and admit that he intends to fabricate all sorts of cankered, ad hoc rules and regulations?". The real question is rather, "Is he hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of his argument relative to mine?" The answer is too well-known to bear repeating, but I should comment that NienBarkNobi makes a living out of anarchism. I call this tactic of his "entrepreneurial anarchism". NienBarkNobi and his associates have unmistakably raised entrepreneurial anarchism to a fine art by using it to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated and disillusioned. Lastly, I can't end this letter without mentioning that inherent in our legal construction of anti-intellectualism is the notion that NienBarkNobi uses scientific-sounding terminology—"phonons", "melanocyte", "extrapyramidal tract", and so on—to create the impression that there is a scientific base for his claim that he's morally obligated to enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of his squadristi to live in an environment that can be described, at best, as contemptuously tolerant.
Spoiler: click to toggle


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
General Guy
Member Avatar
Cett
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I am not writing to agree or disagree with Popple. What I have to say, however, regards Popple's decision to insist that our society be infested with Trotskyism, serfism, boosterism, and an impressive swarm of other "isms". It is requisite, even in this summary sketch, to go back a few years to see how his toadies have the gall to accuse me of abetting a resurgence of contumacious conformism. Were these carnaptious publishers of hate literature born without a self-awareness gene? To answer that rhetorical question let me just say that when I say that Popple cannot endure the world of reality and must take refuge in his stupid fantasies, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that the purpose of life is self-gratification. This is a common fallacy held by uncongenial, brusque scofflaws of one sort or another. Maybe he has a reason for acting the way he does, but I doubt it.

If you want to clear up these muddied waters with some reality, then tell everyone you know the truth, that Popple once had the audacity to tell me that might makes right. My riposte was that even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that he says that his reportages are Holy Writ. But then he turns around and says that everything is happy and fine and good. You know, you can't have it both ways, Popple. It is common knowledge that Popple generally tries to keep his distance from the deceitful, impudent purveyors of malice and hatred who let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of detestable big-labor bosses. However, he sees nothing wrong with instilling a general ennui. Ah the sweet, sweet smell of hypocrisy.

While I agree with others' assessment that Popple's whitewash of the issue offers no real analysis of the situation that resulted in his feebleminded recommendations in the first place, still, Popple is a being who invents nothing, originates nothing, and improves nothing. All he does is make the pot of recidivism overboil and scald the whole world. His grunts say, "Popple is a champion of liberty and individual expression." Yes, I'm afraid they really do talk like that. It's the only way for them to conceal that Popple's perspective is that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and hideous antisocial-types. My perspective, in contrast, is that Popple wants to hand over the country to the most self-serving autocrats you'll ever see. It gets better: He believes that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface. I guess no one's ever told him that his harangues are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of sadism.

Before Popple spews any more psychoanalytical drivel, let me assure him that he says that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. If that's the limit of Popple's perception, acumen, and intelligence, then God help him. He doesn't want us to act as a positive role model for younger people. He would rather we settle for the meatless bone of ultraism. I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But there is no place in this country where we are safe from Popple's foot soldiers, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. When it comes to Popple's allegations, I contend that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to renew those institutions of civil society—like families, schools, churches, and civic groups—that penetrate the sunny façade of his catch-phrases with the sharpened stick of reality. The sooner we do that the better because Popple possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it.

It's not necessarily difficult to advocate social change through dialogue, passive resistance, and nonviolence. We can begin simply by solving our problems over a negotiating table instead of resorting to the battlefield. See? I told you it wasn't necessarily difficult. We just need to remember that Popple maintains that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong. While that happens to be pure fantasy from the world of make-believe, one important fact to consider is that he somehow manages to get away with spreading lies (the government (and perhaps he himself) should have sweeping powers to arrest and hold people indefinitely on flimsy grounds), distortions (he is a model citizen), and misplaced idealism (unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point). However, when I try to respond in kind, I get censored faster than you can say "intercommunicability".

Popple argues that his scribblings are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. This is an entertaining statement, perhaps, except that when taken at face value it presages a likely attempt by Popple to belittle all fine social standards. I used to feel that he was a directionless spouter. However, after seeing how Popple wants to deny citizens the ability to become informed about the destruction that he is capable of, I now have an even lower opinion of him. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that we and Popple obviously need to call a truce on our arguments over presenteeism. Unfortunately, Popple will refuse to accept any such truce, as his whole raison d'être is to promote presenteeism in all its disruptive forms. With this in mind, I, not being one of the many lecherous peculators of this world, must focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a pouty agenda.

I don't know what makes Popple think that he is a perpetual victim of injustice. Maybe he's been sipping cuckoo juice. The fact of the matter is that Popple is like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of nonrepresentationalism and you'll see a parviscient, cynical finagler hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of quislingism in a wishy-washy, postmodernist attempt to trade fundamental human rights for a cheap "guarantee" of safety and security. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that Popple has a vested interest in maintaining the myths that keep his crime syndicate loyal to him. His principal myth is that he is omnipotent. The truth is that many people are shocked when I tell them that Popple thinks that he can make me sink into a miasma of doubt and alienation if he can encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that by allowing Popple to galvanize a brassbound hysteria, a large-scale version of the footling mentality that can distract people from making a serious analysis of the situation, we are allowing him to play puppet master.

I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that people used to think I was exaggerating whenever I said that we now know for certain that Popple's spokesmen intend to defy the rules of logic. After seeing Popple make today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what he has planned for the future these same people now realize that I wasn't exaggerating at all. In fact, they even realize that such conduct as Popple's induced the despotism of Cromwell and the two Bonapartes. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that if Popple manages to destabilize the already volatile social fabric that he purportedly aims to save, civilization will crumble almost immediately. Investigators from a future era will need to sift through the charred wreckage of our society looking for the black box to figure out what happened. Maybe they'll even discover that you may have noticed that Popple is a pukka babbler. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, if Popple doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere.

Is it just me, or do other people also think that it's incredible to me that anybody could be so irresponsible? I ask because I once managed to get Popple to agree that he dismisses his opponents as either servants of an existing power structure or as sufferers of false consciousness. Unfortunately, a few minutes later, he did a volte-face and denied that he had ever said that. He has been trying for quite some time to convince us that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. I, for one, suggest he take this rotting ordure and dump it where he and his fellow feral blackguards congregate. At least then we could act honorably without having to worry that he will require religious services around the world to begin with "Popple is great; Popple is good; we thank Popple for our daily food".

Popple has been known to "prove" statistically that everyone who fails to think and act in strict accordance with his requirements is a semi-intelligible vagrant. As you might have suspected, his proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, Popple's "proof" demonstrates only that much of what he writes is excruciatingly hard to read. If Popple actually wants to write something meaningful, he should stick to the basics: Declare an argument; make supporting statements related to the topic; and draw a conclusion that isn't off on some wild tangent from the original hypothesis. For instance, rather than make the factually unsupported claim that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs—or maybe even chocolate—it would be better to argue that Popple is consistently inconsistent. Okay, that was a facetious statement. This one is not: If Popple doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to sully my reputation, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Popple will grasp the concept that his current aspiration is to create anomie. I'd call that the most violent idea in Popple's long history of violent ideas. It's the sort of idea that draws attention to how he's a hard worker. Popple works hard to prevent anyone from commenting on his narrow-minded canards. This is of course most illuminating, but what if we wish to engage rather in eristic search for truth, or in heuristic debate, or perhaps in paromologetic illation? In my experience, when Popple's apologues are challenged, he usually responds by manipulating public understanding of narcissism. Well, you can't really expect him to defend his positions with facts, explanations, logical arguments, or even references to events that occurred less than two years ago, can you? Having reached this letter's desition, I just want to leave you with the thought that Popple should take all the bull-pucky he's been throwing at us and fertilize his garden with it.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
General Guy
Member Avatar
Cett
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I have had enough of Spehs Mahreen! It is worth noting at the outset that I'd peg the odds at about six to one that Spehs will crucify us on the cross of nativism faster than you can say "deanthropomorphization". If I'm wrong, I promise that I'll gladly become the target of prejudice, ridicule, discrimination, and physical violence. He screams and cries whenever he's prevented from making a fetish of the virtues of morbid, recalcitrant feudalism. I profess that if he stopped acting like such a big baby, maybe then he'd see that he likes promoting promiscuity and obscene language. That's the most damnable thing about him. It's also why ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Spehs would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being ribald.

Spehs's amoral, daffy paroxysms often resemble an inverted fairy tale in that the triumph of innocence comes at the start and the ugly sisters of anarchism and sectarianism enter on stage in triumph for the final curtain. Before Spehs once again claims that he should coordinate a revolution because "it's the right thing to do", he should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with his intimates. Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that Spehs's secret passion is to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. For shame! This point is so important that it deserves a separate discussion, which I'll provide in a moment. But first, let me just say that ignoring this letter can be considered an admission of guilt on Spehs's part. In the presence of high heaven and before the civilized world I therefore assert that Spehs says that he has a close-to-perfect existence that's the envy of the fork-tongued oniomaniacs around him. Hey, Spehs, how about telling us the truth for once?

When Spehs lies, it's consistent with his character, for he's a liar and the father of lies. Another reason that many people consider it consistent is that Spehs would have us believe that his activities are on the up-and-up. Yeah, right. And I also suppose that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like Spehs? The fact of the matter is that he's trying to hide the fact that petty disinformation artists often prove their point by relying on untenable conjecture and unverifiable hearsay. Nevertheless, one thing that rings true with crystalline clarity is that if Spehs ever does transform fear and its inculcation into the preeminent force ruling human existence, he will instantly have as his implacable and passionate enemies millions of people who want to make the world safe for democracy. Such people know that in a lustrum or two, his poison will infect us, sicken us, and destroy us. At the risk of sounding a tad redundant, let me add that I have no set opinion as to whether or not his spleeny Praetorian Guard has its origins in the Jewish Kabala, Babylonian mystery cults, Templars, Freemasons, Illuminati, and assorted interests dedicated to Satanic worship and absolute power. I do, however, surely believe that this is just simple math. That is, if A is more addlepated than B, and B is more addlepated than C, then A is more addlepated than C, right? In case you don't have the secret decoder ring, A is a doctrinaire prima donna; B is an ophidian, sanctimonious ragamuffin; and C is Spehs Mahreen.

My prediction that Spehs would embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians came true so quickly, so brutally, so horribly, that even I was stunned by the magnitude and viciousness of it all. Before he spews any more psychoanalytical drivel, let me assure him that he generally tries to keep his distance from the caustic stumblebums who reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. However, Spehs sees nothing wrong with suppressing people's instinct and intellect. Ah the sweet, sweet smell of hypocrisy.

He who pays the piper calls the tune. With that in mind, I did a little research to find where Spehs gets his money. It turns out that it comes primarily from meretricious, supercilious cardsharps, mischievous sophisters, and—you guessed it—treacherous schizophrenics. This explains why Spehs just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to play fast and loose with the truth."

Are you beginning to get the picture here? I am not in any way placing the blame on Spehs for contemptible renegades who shout direct personal insults and invitations to exchange fisticuffs. That notwithstanding, Spehs is still culpable for plotting to endow cynicism with a false legitimacy. He says that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. Such statements are not just wrong; they're worse than wrong. They reinforce a dangerous and insidious but sadly common misunderstanding among many people. They disguise the fact that my cause is to change the world for the better. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that I have a practical plan for improving the state of education in this country. I propose that we get knowledgeable and well-trained teachers, equip them with syllabi filled with challenging texts and materials, and have them teach students that Spehs is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, his willingness to get everyone to march in lockstep with his beastly, stultiloquent hatchet men sets a new record for brazenness.

Whenever Spehs is presented with the statement that the best available data suggest that history has proven beyond any doubt that his precepts are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom, he spews out the hackneyed excuse that the world's salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions. Ironically, such screwball logic is likely to convince even more people that Spehs is known for walking into crowded rooms and telling everyone there that he has the mandate of Heaven to make people weak and dependent. Try, if you can, to concoct a statement better calculated to show how ridiculous Spehs is. You can't do it. Not only that, but charlatanism is dangerous. His unrealistic version of it is doubly so.

To make a long story short, I want to give people more information about Spehs, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I definitely hope people draw: It is an established fact that Spehs's acolytes merely present their allegations as though they were true, a technique known as a "conclusory" or "Kierkegaardian" leap. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: While I cannot judge his heart, Spehs's actions sincerely appear mudslinging. Can you really blame me for suggesting that he is unable to remove his mental shackles? In a previous letter, I announced my intention to address the real issues faced by mankind. Naturally, this announcement caused Spehs to mutter abuses befitting his education. Incidents like that truly demonstrate how I'd like very much to respond to his claim that if he kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick. Unfortunately, taking into account Spehs's background, education, and intelligence, I am quite sure that Spehs would not be able to understand my response. Hence, let me say simply this: Spehs's janissaries often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear.

Spehs's representatives claim to have no choice but to make nearby communities victims of environmental degradation and toxic waste dumping. I wish there were some way to help these miserable, mephitic porn stars. They are outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand.

You may be surprised to hear this, but in this world, there are lackadaisical slimeballs. There are stiff-necked hellions. There are rats who walk like men. And then there is Spehs. Of those, I assert that Spehs is the most frightful because it doesn't do us much good to become angry and wave our arms and shout about the evils of his allegations in general terms. If we want other people to agree with us and join forces with us, then we must reach out to the poor, the marginalized, and those unfortunate enough to have been labeled as anti-democratic by Spehs's propaganda machine. Let me sum up. I don't see why Spehs Mahreen wants to drain our hope and enthusiasm.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lordberfer00
Member Avatar
The Destroyer of Fun
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
What?

Some people have a lot of free time apparently.

Edit: Did you guys just copy and paste our names into a bunch or single long-winded rant(s) from something else?
Edited by lordberfer00, May 6 2012, 11:48:07 PM.
Servo vestri niger canem ad sinus.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qePHCNoEtqQ

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
General Guy
Member Avatar
Cett
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Complaint/Essay generator.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lordberfer00
Member Avatar
The Destroyer of Fun
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I was about to say... It looks like V wrote these. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maV4zU8wYOo

I'm only complained about for the shortest amount of time, I feel the love.

Edited by lordberfer00, May 7 2012, 12:29:23 AM.
Servo vestri niger canem ad sinus.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qePHCNoEtqQ

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lordraymond
Member Avatar
Wow
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
I almost want to go and replace all names with the [ you ] tag, but I'm far, far too lazy to do that.
TheFinalEnigma
 
Let me in on something I've learned from experience. No matter how much you insult people, your dick is still going to be small.

Axem Red
 
I'm pathetic I know
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheFinalEnigma
Member Avatar
Prettiest Princess
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Ray you should feel privileged, your complaint had both bullet points and colored text.
Spoiler: click to toggle


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheGamerGod333
Member Avatar
TGGer of Versions
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
TheFinalEnigma
May 6 2012, 11:10:18 PM
I can no longer brook TheGamerGod333's stubborn pleas.
TFE pls
▄██████████████▄▐█▄▄▄▄█▌
██████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌███▌▀▀██▀▀
████▄█▌▄▌▄▐▐▌▀███▄▄█▌
▄▄▄▄▄██████████████▀
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Learn More · Sign-up for Free
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · SPAM · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1