| Welcome to Locate and Cement - Plastic Model Kit Review, Advice and Exchange of ideas.. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Model photography; My new setup | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 30 2010, 07:37 PM (634 Views) | |
| Mike W | Mar 30 2010, 07:37 PM Post #1 |
|
Hook down, wheels down... call the ball
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi All, Just wanted to see what your thoughts were on these. I got a new light tent and lighting setup consisting of three 500w equivalent daylight bulbs ,one of which was smashed on arrival so i'm waiting for a replacement. In the mean time I've been playing with just two lamps, one each side of the light tent. I set the camera to aperture priority setting it a f22, white balance set to auto and the rest as per the camera settings. I didn't want to fiddle with too many settings and forget what i'd done My first victim is a 1/72 Revell F-14D Tomcat which happened to be handy. ![]() and a close up... ![]() and with a partner in crime, the 1/72 Fujimi A-6E Intruder... ![]() The close up looks great to me, though I am hoping that the third light from above will help a bit more on the overall shots. As some of you may know I have previously relied on daylight in my conservatory to get decent-ish pix. But using this new setup I can take piccies after dark as these were taken just before posting here. cheers
|
![]() |
|
| MemberOne | Mar 30 2010, 08:05 PM Post #2 |
|
Newbie
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Looks a nice set up ..this is one area where I have problems ..Taking a decent picture |
![]() |
|
| peebeep | Mar 31 2010, 12:17 AM Post #3 |
|
Lots Of Trouble Usually Serious
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Any chance of a pic of the 'studio'? peebeep |
![]() |
|
| Mike W | Mar 31 2010, 10:45 AM Post #4 |
|
Hook down, wheels down... call the ball
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Good point!Here it is on my dining table in the conservatory.as you can see the lights are fully adjustable. the bulbs are 55w with an equivalent 500w output. The "tent" is 100cm square and can easily accomodate large stuff like a 1/32 Jet. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Phreak | Mar 31 2010, 02:34 PM Post #5 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nicely done Mike, hard to see how your method needs improving. As they say in macro photography, the excitement is in tents. |
![]() |
|
| Grant | Mar 31 2010, 07:07 PM Post #6 |
|
Italian correspondent
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's a nice rig there Mike. I did wonder about a tent like that, but it must have been a smaller one because yours looks plenty big enough. I worried that getting in close would be a problem - but clearly not from your photo. The number of lights a setup like that requires also put me off - too much palaver. However, the pictures do look worth it. Looking forward to stunning shots from now on! cheers Grant |
![]() |
|
| Mike W | Mar 31 2010, 07:15 PM Post #7 |
|
Hook down, wheels down... call the ball
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yep, it works for me! It is a bit of a palaver Grant , you're right. But for magazine work its worth it IMHO. I finally received the new bulb today so setup with the top light in addition to the above. These are couple of the results.. ![]() ![]() and I wasn't happy with the first shot of the Harrier, so added +1 exposure compensation, probably too much in hindsight, but I'm still getting used to it all. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
| Phreak | Mar 31 2010, 08:24 PM Post #8 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Forgot to mention Mike. To acheive the maximum available depth of field, carry on shooting at the smallest aperture avaialable (ie F22) and use manual focus. Work out how close the nearest point of focus is and also the furthest point of focus is from the camera lens. Given the resulting difference between the two points, then divide it by three. The point to set the focus on is at one third of this difference. For example, if the nearest point of focus is 15cms and the furthest is 36cms, then the difference is 21cms. Therefore the optimum point of focus will be 15cms plus 7cms (21cms/3) or 22cms from the front of the lens. QED Sorry if I've told you how to suck eggs! |
![]() |
|
| Mike W | Apr 2 2010, 03:44 PM Post #9 |
|
Hook down, wheels down... call the ball
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks Rich, but that all sounds terribly complicated Using the EOS AF point selector, I just select the centre point which acts as a measure for where the point of focus should be. Then by selecting, as you say, the smallest aperture which is f32 giving me the best possible depth of field and using the self timer removes the camera shake. Works for me!
|
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Hints and Tips · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)






Good point!




7:26 PM Jul 11





