| Welcome to The Hideout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Valentine | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 2 2005, 09:44 AM (416 Views) | |
| >|LOA|<Trauma | Feb 7 2005, 11:34 PM Post #16 |
|
Unregistered
|
I AGREE WITH T-RCX DAMN OPINIONS, even tho just like T-r im supposed to think that other's opinions are way overrated, but I disagree with him when it comes to Newton, computers and history. Oh I forgot, beer pwns
|
|
|
| >|LOA|<T-RCX | Feb 8 2005, 02:07 PM Post #17 |
|
Unregistered
|
Newtonian physics are overrated simply because they're innaccurate at describing most complex principles and simply outdated. Sure Newton was a smart guy for his time, but he gets too much credit for postulating incorrect theories. Of course his three laws of motion are fairly exceptional, but someone else could just have easily hypothesized and came to the same conclusions as he did. Newton was a great scientist, but his physics simply aren't good enough anymore. Computers are useful, but they are nothing more than machines. The human brain is a far more powerful processing tool, but the world has come to rely on machines for virtually everything, which are in fact less perfect than a living being. Think about it, how many times has your computer made you want to melt it down and convert it into something useful, like a metal garbage can? Computers are nice and good, but they're simply given too much credit for being such inefficient machines. And as for history, it can certainly be interesting and even entertaining, yet what effect does it really have on our existances? Yes, we should look to the past to observe the flaws of humanity so that we can avoid them in the future, but how many times does that actually work? If mankind had really learned from World War I, there would not have been a WWII. And our knowledge of history only extends back several thousand years before everything else becomes mere theory, so it can be postulated that within another several millenia, this present time will be little more than a figment of the past, with little substantial useful observational data about the time period beyond speculation. Thus history, though a grand and often glorious concoction of human existance, is really less useful than it would be made out to be. And beer just allows a person to destroy his own body while taking a small amount of pleasure from the experience, so unless you're into the destruction of life, beer doesn't really do anything exceptional to make it worth the amount of attention it gets. Well.... now that that's been said, perhaps it would be wise to return to the original topic of this thread, no matter how overrated it is. |
|
|
| RED&BLUE_SpiderMan | Feb 9 2005, 12:11 AM Post #18 |
|
Unregistered
|
Common, whats wrong with valentimes. lets have an get together |
|
|
| « Previous Topic · Drunkie's Bar n Grill/Drunken Donuts · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






6:59 PM Jul 10

