Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
CSM Legion Rules Query; Question on possible conflict
Topic Started: 12 Sep 2015, 07:45 PM (288 Views)
Duke
Member Avatar

Super minor little thing here, but I'd still like to have a definitive answer on it.

If a Chaos Acolyte pays for the Aspiring Sorcerer upgrade, can the rest of the list still pay for a legion rule? Does the A.S. count as a Chaos Acolyte for army-wide Legion payment?

I'm assuming yes on both accounts.

The situation as I imagine it:
The A.S. will not benefit from the rule, but say you wanted to play Black Legion- your valid paying selections will pay the Legion tax (1ppm), and the A.S. will as well (though not benefit himself obviously).

The situation as it could be:
The A.S., no longer strictly a 'Chaos Acolyte', does not pay the tax. Either the rest of the qualifying units can, or they cannot.

What's the consensus?

PS: I was a bit surprised that only one Chosen per army can select a special weap. Is that the case?

Offline
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Kill team: Rules and list discussion · Next Topic »