| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Chaplin Dreadnoughts and Apoc' | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 17 Feb 2010, 11:08 AM (537 Views) | |
| Roesor | 17 Feb 2010, 11:08 AM Post #1 |
|
Warrant Officer First Class
|
Although I've no interest in playing Apocolypse, I heard some stuff covered in the book allows you to field stuff in normal games that evidently aren't covered in the usual codexs, can anyone confirm that I can use a Chaplin Dreadnought in a normal 40k game? The points values and such are actually availiable in a pdf on Forgeworld but the writing is too small for me to see if its apocolypse only or not. Also no idea whether being Black Templar wuld be a problem, but as far as I'm aware it merely says 'Space Marine' Armies, which of course, Templars still are. I do want to add a nother dread' to my army but I won't if I can't make it venerable, and the chaplin one is regardless of existing ones, and cheaper. |
![]() |
|
| ☺Dave38x | 17 Feb 2010, 11:42 AM Post #2 |
![]()
DubDubDubDubDub
|
If forgeworld released rules for it then you can use it in games.. |
![]() |
|
| ☺The Antipope | 17 Feb 2010, 12:18 PM Post #3 |
|
Major Major Major Major
|
True. They tend to release differing rules for their stuffin and out of Apoc but I definately wouldn't have a problem playing a normal 40k game against you if you used a Chaplian Dread. Very characterful for Templars anyway. |
![]() |
|
| ☺Dave38x | 17 Feb 2010, 12:44 PM Post #4 |
![]()
DubDubDubDubDub
|
as well as that the rules differ for the same vehicle from book to book, so which book you pull the rules from can affect the performance of the vehicle, and the points cost :p |
![]() |
|
| Roesor | 17 Feb 2010, 12:56 PM Post #5 |
|
Warrant Officer First Class
|
Awsome sauce. Now just have to decide whether to get one from there or make my own from the new multi-part plastic venerable dread kit, which btw looks AWSOME, saw a built one at my store. for anyone else interested; http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/pdf/chap.pdf Oh and thanks
Edited by Roesor, 17 Feb 2010, 12:59 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Roesor | 17 Feb 2010, 01:08 PM Post #6 |
|
Warrant Officer First Class
|
Does that mean that these rules are applicable as well? Even though they aren't in the codex? http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/pdf/IA2Update28Aug.pdf Specifiaclly the dreadnought drop pod. edit: Ack an evil twin of my previous post! o.o Sorry. Edited by Roesor, 17 Feb 2010, 01:09 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| ☺Dave38x | 18 Feb 2010, 12:09 AM Post #7 |
![]()
DubDubDubDubDub
|
yep, still valid. and yep, still valid
|
![]() |
|
| Roesor | 18 Feb 2010, 12:17 AM Post #8 |
|
Warrant Officer First Class
|
Holy quivering [well, someone needs a cool off period]balls of anticipation. I can drop pod assault my dreadnought! And then assault! I can use different kinds of Land Raider! I can have Valkyries in (should I choose to do one) a Daemonhunter army! I can..I can...do just about everything I've ever wanted to be able to do! (except take an Ironclad) Ahahahahahaha! My girlfriends going to hate this, now where's that useless drop pod and plasticard... Soon my great Warmachine shall fall like a God of Holy and righteous death upon the upstart Sisters of Battle, and lay waste to the pale shadow of the Asartes! Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! O.o Seriously, quite chuffed. She's become rather uppity of late >_> Killing my dreadnought before it's great works are begun and so forth. Edited by Roesor, 18 Feb 2010, 12:24 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Brambleten | 18 Feb 2010, 10:22 AM Post #9 |
![]()
The Red Hood
|
other than the fact you need your opponent's permission before you break out the non codex FW stuff, your good
|
![]() |
|
| Roesor | 18 Feb 2010, 02:39 PM Post #10 |
|
Warrant Officer First Class
|
o.O ....say what? How about if I tell them and they don't say no? Beause if I explain to my darling dearest what it does she isn't going to let me >_> She's a real 'take any advantage you can' kinda player. |
![]() |
|
| Brambleten | 18 Feb 2010, 02:45 PM Post #11 |
![]()
The Red Hood
|
you just say "am i allowed to use units from whatever sourcebook/website", and if they say yes, its fair game. if not, then its codex only im afraid. if she says no, let her look at FW for anything she wants and make sure she understands that she cant use whatever thing she likes if you cant use your chappy dread/assault pods |
![]() |
|
| Mawa | 18 Feb 2010, 03:12 PM Post #12 |
|
Lieutenant
|
Now you see this is what always annoys me with FW stuff, the whole players permission thing. I mean sure if your gonna whip out a Titan or summat it'd be nice to know beforehand (Trust me been involved in such a game, was rather awkward when one player went mental and threw his land Raider on the floor in anger) but something like a dread or Leman Russ Variant etc needs permission eh?? Its not like its a 3rd party ruleset or the like I mean it is made by GW after all, isn't it about time that this was sorted out. Didnth the whole permission things stem from GT Tournies stating that it wasnt official GW stuff so therefore not legal or am i remembering this wrong? |
![]() |
|
| # Marovian | 18 Feb 2010, 03:41 PM Post #13 |
|
Ginger Law Enforcer
|
I know in tournies it's a big no no but I don't see why a Russ variant is a problem. But then again in a pick up game against a stranger I suppose it might be difficult. |
![]() |
|
| ☺Dave38x | 18 Feb 2010, 05:58 PM Post #14 |
![]()
DubDubDubDubDub
|
several people ive talked to (at GW and elsewhere) say that you dont need permission for anything that isnt a superheavy or flier, as its been published by GW (via forgeworld) its legit. |
![]() |
|
| Roesor | 24 Feb 2010, 08:04 PM Post #15 |
|
Warrant Officer First Class
|
I asked around abit but theres n ot much info on it, far as I can tell no one would give a toss about a Chaplin dreadnought, but more people would say no to a Dreadnought assault pod. But the thing makes sense, most can't assault because they'll be all shaken up..but a Dread wouldn't be and if I can't use it in tourney's then of course on my limited budget, I'm not going to get one before getting other models, and as Templar it would have been really awsome to have another Venerable Dreadnought, (since the blasted Ultramarines can have up to SIX!) and it is as someone said a very 'Templar' thing to do. |
![]() |
|
| ☺The Antipope | 1 Mar 2010, 09:12 PM Post #16 |
|
Major Major Major Major
|
I'm relatively sure that Dreads can take Drop Pods in the actual codex anyway, wait a minute... reaches three foot to the right and flicks through relevant book...Yes, Dreads can take Drop Pods within the Codex. So whilst I can understand someone objecting to a Chaplain Dread, they don't really have any ground to stand on when it comes to pods. |
![]() |
|
| Roesor | 1 Mar 2010, 11:58 PM Post #17 |
|
Warrant Officer First Class
|
Aye, and then they jump out..blast something..and get shot. Next to useless. They need to make the Lucius pattern Dreadnought drop pod a codex option. Heh, and I was right, every person i've asked so far has gone, 'Um...sorry dude, but no.' I would very very much like to see the chaplin dreadnought become a codex choice when the Templars get updated. Even better if they give me dreadnought assault drop pods. |
![]() |
|
| ☺charlie_c67 | 2 Mar 2010, 12:44 AM Post #18 |
|
Lieutenant
|
Depends which way you jump out
|
![]() |
|
| ☺The Antipope | 2 Mar 2010, 11:57 AM Post #19 |
|
Major Major Major Major
|
What's the difference? Aside from Aesthetics? |
![]() |
|
| ☺charlie_c67 | 2 Mar 2010, 05:34 PM Post #20 |
|
Lieutenant
|
Whether you use the drop pod as cover or not! I know you can "shoot" through it, but would provide a lot of cover. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Banter · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2







8:21 AM Jul 11