| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| New Forthcoming Guard; Inc Valk & stuff from Design Studio Day | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 8 Feb 2009, 09:53 PM (28,072 Views) | |
| Jonny5 | 18 Mar 2009, 09:01 PM Post #361 |
|
Warrant Officer First Class
|
My thoughts exactly box would of looked a lot better with the 'chans in their natural hunting ground. |
![]() |
|
| # KayvaanShrike | 18 Mar 2009, 09:04 PM Post #362 |
|
Marine Biologist
|
Yeah I agree, I was kinda planning on doing Catachans with Urban bases, but they would have urban camo fatigues etc on, so wouldn't look out of place. |
![]() |
|
| Brambleten | 18 Mar 2009, 09:05 PM Post #363 |
![]()
The Red Hood
|
it was probably decided by GW to keep the colour scheme of the cadian and catachan boxes the same, and maybe cadians sell better, so they went for the scheme that worked best for them |
![]() |
|
| ☺charlie_c67 | 19 Mar 2009, 12:05 AM Post #364 |
|
Lieutenant
|
Hmmmm well, I've placed my pre-order already....but hey I get a pay rise before they come so that's good. |
![]() |
|
| # Digits | 19 Mar 2009, 12:57 AM Post #365 |
|
Shadowkin
|
I like the catachan flag so I need a box for my Drogans. I dare say the chan vests will be useful for arty crew / skellies. I agree, they should have photoshopped them better though... |
![]() |
|
| # the_great_gonzo | 19 Mar 2009, 08:59 AM Post #366 |
![]()
Wg Cdr
|
having read the new "Squadron" rumour on BoLS, I think I might need to buy another 2 FW hellhounds. And some more Leman Russ, and a couple of Vaulks, and............ |
![]() |
|
| ☺Jasevx | 19 Mar 2009, 07:37 PM Post #367 |
|
Techmarine
|
list grows longer, the box art as a whole has been rushed, the stormlord box is shocking with gaps alover the tank. |
![]() |
|
| Schoolcormorant | 19 Mar 2009, 07:40 PM Post #368 |
|
Techpriest
|
Is Sal as thrilled and excited as you? Or is she warming up the waffle iron for your special areas? SC |
![]() |
|
| ☺Jasevx | 19 Mar 2009, 07:48 PM Post #369 |
|
Techmarine
|
she can't wait! yer right
|
![]() |
|
| Burnie | 19 Mar 2009, 10:36 PM Post #370 |
|
Lieutenant
|
Jase, epic bugger! Are the gaps equally bad in the shadowsword configuration? |
![]() |
|
| hiveminion | 19 Mar 2009, 11:22 PM Post #371 |
|
Second Lieutenant
|
They had the codex at my local store today, didn't took the time to read it but I did glance over the Valyrie entry, I've finally found the army that will draw me away from my Space Marines! An all-airborne Guard force, the sight of 9 Valks swooping over the battlefield is just too fantastic to resist. 6 Vendettas and 3 Valks total nearly 1000 points by themselves but that gives you 18 twin linked lascannons and 6 S4 AP5 one-shot pieplates. Just have to think of a theme and find the cash...
Edited by hiveminion, 19 Mar 2009, 11:23 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| ☺Jasevx | 20 Mar 2009, 08:29 AM Post #372 |
|
Techmarine
|
Theres plenty of ways in Holland to make cash! Burnie, it was just a rushed photo, the kit itself is brilliantly cast, all the parts fit together perfectly. |
![]() |
|
| Lycosa Astra | 20 Mar 2009, 10:53 AM Post #373 |
|
Corporal
|
Can you confirm the transport capacity on the Vendetta for us? There seems to be some concerns about whether it can carry troops or not, and if it can, whether it's the same or less than the Valkyrie. Edited by Lycosa Astra, 20 Mar 2009, 10:55 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| hiveminion | 20 Mar 2009, 12:22 PM Post #374 |
|
Second Lieutenant
|
It's the same, 12 infantry. Compared to a Valkyrie the Vendetta seems to be way better for the points, you can even upgrade it with Hellstrikes and other weaponry to give it some anti-infantry punch, though a Vet squad with a Heavy Flamer transported inside should be capable of that as well. |
![]() |
|
| # Old Guard | 20 Mar 2009, 12:48 PM Post #375 |
|
Entertainment officer...Meet the gang cos the boys are here.....
|
For the box photo they used the 'prototype' one that we saw at the thank you day which was built so that 5 out of the 6 options could be done off the one chassis. Consequently (and especially after us hamfisted lot got our hands on it) the gaps show. If you look at some of the WD pictures it again looks a bit ropey, but as jase said it fits together nicely. |
![]() |
|
| Tinners | 20 Mar 2009, 12:59 PM Post #376 |
|
Doesn't it look like a face!
|
hmmm...I want a valk but they are pretty expensive for what they are, tho 1980s Soviet airborne is very tempting. |
![]() |
|
| Railgunner | 20 Mar 2009, 02:06 PM Post #377 |
![]()
Warrant Officer First Class
|
Just wondering, concerning pre-orders, when is it that GW takes your money? When you order it or when it's dispatched? RG |
![]() |
|
| ☺highmarshaldave | 20 Mar 2009, 02:51 PM Post #378 |
|
Urban Leg-End
|
Hud on now. . . That cannot be right, surely? My DaveLogic (tm) tells me it ought to be around six. Twelve transport slots and the weapons loadout of a full gunship sounds too retarded to be true (even coming from the guys who made the damn thing a skimmer). Dave out. |
![]() |
|
| Burnie | 20 Mar 2009, 08:13 PM Post #379 |
|
Lieutenant
|
Had no idea about this whole vendetta thing, sounds most awesome ![]() RG: I just went in to my local gw and asked them to order in extra stuff on top of their stock for me, they'll be taking payment when I get the goods
|
![]() |
|
| # Marovian | 21 Mar 2009, 01:53 AM Post #380 |
|
Ginger Law Enforcer
|
When I rang up to pre-order a Baneblade, I asked that very question and was told that they take the money at the point of order, not despatch. Bit of a pain I know. As an aside, according to the advert at the top of the page, I can order my Thai beauty today! No advanced orders for them apparetly! |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Banter · Next Topic » |










8:36 AM Jul 11