| This is an archived forum, so it is here for read-only purposes only. We are not accepting new members and members cannot post any longer. Members can, however, access their old private messages. Strawberry Fields was open from 2006 until 2011. There is a Strawberry Fields Beatles Forum on Facebook. If you are registered with Facebook, join us at the group there! |
| 2008 U.S. Presidential Election | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 22 2007, 05:49 AM (37,433 Views) | |
| Mia Culpa | Jul 10 2008, 07:33 AM Post #1301 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
I have to disagree again. Obviously John rules. |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 10 2008, 09:05 AM Post #1302 |
|
Tell me about it. I remember being accused of anti-semitism just for stating the simple fact that there are Jewish Israeli terrorist organisations in the context of whether Israel really is such a poor little victim when it comes to terrorism. I'm a Catholic, but I'm not a kiddie-fiddler. Just in case anyone was wondering. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| fab4fan | Jul 10 2008, 01:59 PM Post #1303 |
![]()
Caretaker
|
If Jesse is finally exposed for the fraud that he is from this statement than yes Bill, nothing more important for the history of the US happened yesterday. Sorry the clip is from FOX, let me relate the coverage from CNN to you. David Gergan implied that a war was about to start between the politics of the charlatan and the politics of Yes We Can! A war between a man made of a happenstance photo and a self made man. One who tells his people to hold out their hands and one who tells them to get off their asses. I think Jesse is feeling a little guilty about his "fatherless" love child and Obama's Father's Day speech. ps Obviously the above with David Gergan is how I heard what he said and not a direct quote |
| Mnisthiti mou Kurie! | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 10 2008, 02:49 PM Post #1304 |
|
Sounds to me like a whole lot of political grave-dancing from a bunch of people who have had a hardon for Jackson for most of their adult lives. Let them have their fun. It will not change the political landscape. My only question is this: How is it that Jackson gets constantly investigated when the lies that led the country to war must be left in the past? Jackson may be a political opportunist but I'm not aware that he has any blood on his hands. I'm sensing double standards here. No, correction: I have one other question: why do I get asked to comment on this? Jesse Jackson is irrelevant to me and not analogous to any point I've been making.
Edited by Bill, Jul 10 2008, 03:09 PM.
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 10 2008, 07:59 PM Post #1305 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
And that's what makes the world go round!
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 10 2008, 08:08 PM Post #1306 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
I don't know 100% for sure where you live; I don't know much about you but I can surmise from your posts and your avatar that you are possibly an Israeli living there? If true, in your part of the world, how do you tell who is an extremist or terrorist? Do you have "Christian" terrorists over there? I've never even heard of that term! Which "Christian" country are you referring to? I've never heard of anyplace in this world that hasn't been touched by some type or fear of any terrorism. Yes, extremists are the ones to fear. I think the problem is being able to identify who is one and who is not. |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 10 2008, 08:35 PM Post #1307 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
I can only comment on what I know about this, but I do have some questions for you. Christians read the Bible. Jews read the Torah. Muslims read the Koran. As far as I know, there are no teachings in the Bible nor the Torah that would encourage any kind of terrorism. The USA, generally considered a "Christian" country, is a great ally and defender of the state of Israel and her rights to be a country. Not being Muslim, I've never read the Koran (and not being Jewish, I've not read the Torah). But I have read/heard quoted things from the Koran like, "Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends." (Surah 5:51) And there are many many more passages which supposedly support the Muslim terrorists' reasons for what they do. If a religion teaches this type of hatred/retalliation towards others, then can you understand the fears that it can generally cause? I do realize that scriptures can be isolated and misquoted (it happens all the time in the Bible, at least) but I think that when you put 2 + 2 together and there are actual terrorist attacks (like the WTC), reasons will be investigated and conclusions will be made as to the motivation. You say there are Jewish terrorist organizations and maybe so; I'm no expert. But I've never heard of them threatening or attacking our country; I've never read/heard of their teachings that encourage any type of terrorism actions (actually I thought that it was more of a defensive nature so that they can defend their right to be a nation in that area). Some have made comments that if Hitler had won the war, we'd all be speaking German. I don't take that personally (and I could due to my family heritage) but I do certainly understand where that comes from. Everyone hated my family when they came to this country after the war for the simple fact they were Germans; they were not "Nazis" but it didn't matter...they were "evil Germans." They were simple farmers that lost everything; they could no more control what Hitler was doing than we can control what our leadership does. All this to say that this is a hot and sensitive topic; and I can't say I have all the answers....but I do have lots of questions! :$ |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 10 2008, 11:54 PM Post #1308 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
Heidi, us non-Jews know the Torah as The Old Testament, though there is a bit more than what is in the Christian Bible. It is the 5 books of Moses: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. You might be thinking of the Talmud which is the Jewish Scripture, their meanings, and how to apply the Laws. As for that verse from the Qur'an, this may satisfy what you need to know (it is lengthy so will not post the page), here is the link! Qur'an verse Surah 5:51 |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 11 2008, 12:37 AM Post #1309 |
|
And did you investigate who quoted those supposed lines and factor in their motivation? Were they quoted by actual Islamic scholars, or by fearmongering websites? You're right that the Bible is often misquoted and misinterpreted even by people who claim to be Christians (Westboro anyone?) but we do not use that as an excuse to suspect all Christianity, so why treat other faiths differently? You can't have it both ways.
They don't wear uniforms. And when Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated, it wasn't by a Muslim.
You've never heard of the IRA?
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 11 2008, 02:13 AM Post #1310 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Thanks for the correction! Interesting link...thanks. It seems similar to me in the fact that many Biblical scriptures are so often misquoted/misunderstood and when you go back to the context, the original language, etc. it becomes clear(er). |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 12 2008, 06:53 AM Post #1311 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
Next time somebody calls you an anti-semite ask them what a semite is. If they say Jewish people you'll know they don't know what they're talking about. |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 12 2008, 06:55 AM Post #1312 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
I mean no offense by this, but it sounds like you know very little about the world. Racism is bad no matter where I live. How can you tell who the terrorists are? They're the ones using fear and hate to segregate people. |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 12 2008, 06:57 AM Post #1313 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
You might be surprised to learn that Christians read an abridged interpretation of the Tanakh and Muslims read parts of the Sefer Torah, Nevi'im and Bible. It's not germane to this discussion, but you can't really read the Torah. People can easily argue that saying the only way to Heaven is through Jesus encourages people to kill in his name. The Inquisitions and Shoah were terrorism in extremes. The Tanakh tells Jews to return to Israel. That's caused all kinds of problems. |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 12 2008, 07:00 AM Post #1314 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
I really don't know where to begin. Please stop watching Fox News. If you really want to investigate talk to Muslims, not people who hate Muslims. |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 12 2008, 07:02 AM Post #1315 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
So if it doesn't affect your country it doesn't matter? Defensive terrorism? Don't all terrorists think they're defending something? |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 12 2008, 10:51 AM Post #1316 |
|
Quote of the week!
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 13 2008, 04:47 AM Post #1317 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Since you precluded your statement with asking me "not to take offense," I won't...but your remark is anything but complimentary. I can't help but wonder why you would surmise I'm ignorant about "the world." Is it because I ask a lot of questions? I'm not uneducated nor am I ignorant; I am curious about how others who live elsewhere see things. I realize racism is not a "good" thing, but if one lives in another part of the world, don't you think that their perspectives may come from a different point of view? It's obvious you don't want to share where you live; it's your perogative & I guess I really don't care anymore to try and understand you on a more personal level.I think you're probably smart enough to understand my question about telling who is and isn't a "terrorist." Your pat answer did not address my question with the same definition of the word as I meant it (and you know it). It seems relatively easy for you to pick apart my posts and give curt answers to specific lines only. No offense. |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 13 2008, 05:34 AM Post #1318 |
|
There are different types of questions. If a question is based on a false assumption, then it's not an open-ended question and it does reveal something about the person asking the question. It would be like asking "Why are Americans racist?" Asking such a question, even if it is asked in good faith, reveals a comprehensive lack of understanding of America. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| fab4fan | Jul 13 2008, 06:00 AM Post #1319 |
![]()
Caretaker
|
The people of the Islamic faith, whichever nationality they are, that want to kill Israelis, U.S.A .ers, (that's for Michelle) and the "west;" what are we allowed to call them, without fear of being called racist, bigoted and/or stupid, so this 'discussion' can get past the bullsh*t semantics level? Or am I not to believe what has been reported by every conceivable means of communication other than FOX News all my life. Is that really the bullsh*t? That would be say from about 1967 (about 8 years old.) Have me tell you about my flight to Greece aboard EL AL, the Israeli airliner for Christmas vacation in 1967 three months after the 6 day war, landing in Athens the same day the King tried to overthrow the junta that had taken over Greece some months prior. (or maybe not.)
|
| Mnisthiti mou Kurie! | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 13 2008, 06:50 AM Post #1320 |
|
It's really very simple. Call a terrorist a terrorist. Call a Muslim a Muslim. Call a Greek a Greek. And leave out any information that is not relevant to the discussion - just like Bill O'Reilly did. You mention their faith but not their nationality. Why? I find that very interesting. People don't refer to Barack Obama as the black democratic nominee. That would be racist because he is the nominee and race is neither here nor there. Likewise, a terrorist is a terrorist. It's that simple. And the fact that some people seem to be so shocked that there are terrorists who are not in fact Muslim just goes to show how ill-informed and, yes, racist, the debate has become. And it's become that way because people are all too keen to dumb it down to its most obvious components. Oh, it's because they're Muslim, that must be it. Why isn't it because they're male? Why isn't it because they have black hair? Why aren't the IRA called Catholic terrorists, even when it's factually accurate to say so? The answer is because Catholicism has nothing to do with the issue. The issue is terrorism and radicalism. The same goes for terrorists on any other creed. It really is so very obvious. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| maccascruff | Jul 13 2008, 06:00 PM Post #1321 |
|
Sing the Changes
|
Some people do--my boss and I get to hear it every day. My parents do, too. They are racist. CNN interviewed some people and one woman won't vote for Obama because he is Muslim. Go figure. |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 13 2008, 11:11 PM Post #1322 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Sorry, I simply can't agree with this statement. You're saying that every question one should ask should be based on only a truthful assumptions? I've always been taught there is not such a thing as a dumb question. Now we're qualifying the types of questions people ask! Isn't racism a complicated and multifaceted issue? It's not a simple question like "where is the closest Starbucks?"
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 14 2008, 12:22 AM Post #1323 |
|
No, I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying that when a question IS based on demonstrably false assumptions, then there's nothing wrong pointing the falsehood out and respectfully suggesting the question is misinformed - which is exactly what has happened. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 14 2008, 12:27 AM Post #1324 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
I don't think it's as obvious as you think, or there wouldn't be this discussion in the world. Of course there are different nationalities that subscribe to different religious faiths. While not all Muslims are from the middle east; not all Buddhists are from the orient; not all Hindis are from India; not all Christians are caucasion...isn't is safe to say that the majority stem from there or are associated with a certain region? Don't we make assumptions all the time? So when assumptions are made, can't you say that is comes from a reasonable line of thinking? Regarding the conflict in Ireland, from what I understand the real motivation was political and not religious, so why would Catholicism be given credit? It only makes sense that they would not be called "Catholic Terrorists!" In contrast, the terrorists who bombed the WTC are the ones themselves who said they did it for the sake of Allah and give credit to their religious faith as their motivation...so then what are we to think?? |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 14 2008, 12:35 AM Post #1325 |
|
And the Westboro freaks claim they're doing God's work too. What's your point? What are we to think? That Christians are evil? Or merely that "not all" Christians are evil. Christianity teaches us to do unto others as we would have them to unto ourselves. That's all I'm suggesting. Give others the benefit of the doubt in the same way we want them to give us the benefit of the doubt despite the crimes committed in the name of our respective faiths. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 14 2008, 12:41 AM Post #1326 |
|
BINGO! Now you're getting it. I've got news for you: ALL terrorism is political. The brainwashed footsoldiers may think they're doing it for their faith but the ones controlling them only have POLITICAL aims. There's no difference between al Qeada and the IRA. They are both organisation of a single faith with the political aims of not having others interfere in how they live. A respectable enough cause rendered trivial by their methods. So what are we to think? We're to think beyond the lowest common denominator. You've chosen to do that with regard to the IRA and good for you. The next step is to do it on all the issues. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 14 2008, 12:48 AM Post #1327 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Yes, they are a bunch of loonies but they haven't blown up a building with 3000 innocents & given their religious beliefs as an excuse. And they don't proclaim that they have such aspirations to cause the destruction of a nation. If they did, then you can bet that Christianity would be in the hot seat, and it's already under fire because of their poor examples of the hateful message they spew. I totally agree with your last paragraph, by the way!
Edited by Bag O' Nails, Jul 14 2008, 12:50 AM.
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 14 2008, 12:51 AM Post #1328 |
|
Deleted User
|
plenty of peopel call them catholic terriorists or sectairian / racist shites why coz that is what they are. the catholic church in ireland has a long history of supporting them and others like them. |
|
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 14 2008, 12:55 AM Post #1329 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
The only difference between Al Quada and the IRA is that the IRA has not attacked us on our soil. They have not set out on the destruction of my country. Yes, terrorism is terrorism, and whatever reason is given for motivation, credit will be given. If I tell you that I murdered your family because the devil made me do it, who do you give credit to...me or the devil? |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 14 2008, 12:58 AM Post #1330 |
|
Right, so we're back to terrorism only being a bad thing when it happens to Americans and all the other victims don't matter..... right! If you killed my family I would give full credit to you and I wouldn't give a f*ck what your religion is. I guess we differ on that. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 14 2008, 01:00 AM Post #1331 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Since this got slightly off topic, let me connect the dots getting back to the candidates by posting a link to this article by columnist Thomas Sowell about Obama vs McCain:http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2008/06/05/obama_and_mccain |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| maccascruff | Jul 14 2008, 01:02 AM Post #1332 |
|
Sing the Changes
|
Al Queda has attacked and killed all kinds of people all over the world. I dislike them because they are murderers. I would equally dislike you if you murdered me, my family or my friends and I wouldn't care what religion or where you came from. Murder ir murder no matter the so called reason for it. I don't agree that terrorism is only bad when it happens on our soil. Terrorism is wrong no matter where it occurs. |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 14 2008, 01:07 AM Post #1333 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
I never said that terrorism in other places didn't matter! I am, however, talking about terrorism in my country, as it pertains to this thread. Well, I threw that "the devil made me do it" remark because the "Night Stalker" serial killer, Richard Ramierz used Satan as his motivation for his actions. My only point in even saying this is that whether right or wrong, people use excuses for their actions and like to cast the blame on some "religious-based" ideals. |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 14 2008, 03:15 AM Post #1334 |
|
Your Satanist example proves my point. Murder is the objective and faith is the excuse. You can find passages in the Bible that could be taken as justification for everything from wife-beating to patricide but no-one offers that as evidence that Christianity is a violent religion. I commend you for seeing the broader picture when it comes to the IRA. You're absolutely right. So how would you respond to those who would say, "All I know is that not all Catholics are IRA but all IRA are Catholics." Would you say that was a gross oversimplification of the facts? I would! So if you make the effort to understand the broader issues of terrorism committed by people who happen to be Christian (by word if not by deed), then why not try to understand the deeper issues of terrorism committed by people who happen to be Muslim (again, by word if not by deed)? To do one and not the other looks like double-standards.
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 14 2008, 03:15 AM Post #1335 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
I don't know how or why I'd preclude my own statement, but I really meant no offense and I apologise if I've hurt you in some way. My assumption that you don't know much about the world beyond the Jersey Turnpike is just that, an assumption. We all make assumptions about people without much evidence and I'm as guilty of that as anybody. You could be an expert on cultural interpretation for all I know. But what you've posted here surprises me, especially with respect to Muslims. I know what the anti-Muslim propagandists think but it's always shocking to hear people who actually follow that line, especially from somebody who lives in a country with 2 million Muslims. Most of the terrorist attacks in your country are performed by Americans. Most were Christians. Some were Jewish. I don't know what that Korean student was. Why are you more worried about the Muslims than the others? Do you believe 911 was the only terrorist attack against Americans? Historically black Americans do more damage than Muslims. Did you guys ever figure out who sent the anthrax? I bet it wasn't a Muslim. I agree that different perspectives make these discussions more interesting. And sometimes people with different perspectives will disagree. That's why there's chocolate and vanilla. I don't mind sharing where I live. I live in Israel. I've been here since I moved from China. Before that I lived in Alaska. And on and on. When I said racism is bad no matter where I live I thought my point was obvious. I guess I really didn't understand your question about who is or isn't a terrorist just as I don't understand your use of quotes. Maybe you're overestimating my intelligence. Or maybe we define the word in different ways. I think it's obvious who a terrorist is by their actions. How they worship God is irrelevant, except that God condemns terrorism performed by anybody of any religion or nationality. I picked apart your posts because I don't know any other way to quote specific sentences without quoting the whole post. I'll apologise to anybody I've offended but I won't apologise for responding to posts. That's why we're here. If nobody responds it gets quiet real fast. |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 14 2008, 03:16 AM Post #1336 |
|
Then you don't get to comment on what happened afterwards. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 14 2008, 03:18 AM Post #1337 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
Apparently not. |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 14 2008, 05:41 AM Post #1338 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
Why does it matter on who attacked who on whose soil? Terrorism is just that.......terrorism. What do you call a couple of Americans who blow up a federal building? What do you call a gang of people who create terror in their city or town? Most people call them gangs, I call them terrorist! They have no religious affiliations (yet most are brought up Christian) but they recruit many more people than Al Qaeda does. They kill over a hundred in City alone per year yet their crimes do not capture the attention of the US Homeland Security but the police have little resources to put them away as to many witness are terrified to testify against them. These are the terrorists that do more damage to any innercity than Al Qaeda can ever think of doing. Yes you can compare Westboro with Al Qaeda. They may not kill but they certainly do condone the killing of people they don't like. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 14 2008, 06:18 AM Post #1339 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Well, that sounds reasonable but the plain and simple fact is that a great percentage of people in this country don't vote (and that's a terrible shame)...but it doesn't mean you can't have an opinion. Any other comments on the rest of the article, or did you stop reading because he didn't vote in '72?
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 14 2008, 06:35 AM Post #1340 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Really? While I agree that that "church" is not a true representation of Christianity and preach a terribly wrong message, they don't have secret terrorist cells all over the world that are recruiting people towards destroying America as we know it. |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 14 2008, 07:36 AM Post #1341 |
|
Since you ask, it's the usual bullsh*t scaremongering, at odds with Pentagon intelligence, that we come to expect from right wing sites like Town Hall. It's funny how it all sound so much like what was said about Iraq six years ago, with one letter changed. Does anyone remember how that turned out. He is entitled to his opinion of course, but his opinion doesn't count because he chose not to make it count when it mattered. No matter how dull the candidates may be (and that's certainly not the case in this election, unless you're a right-wing ideologue) there is always the lesser of two evils. I have no respect for people who don't vote at the best of times, but when someone who unashamedly admits he didn't vote in the past now tells people how important it is to vote this time, I think that stinks. It also shows a fundamental ignorance of history because according to my memory, America was at war in 1972 and this joker cared so much about that and the threats to his country that not only would he not get off his shitter and vote then, he remains proud of the fact now. What a loser! |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 15 2008, 01:04 AM Post #1342 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
They may not but they, and groups like them, have an outreach preaching their brand of hatred worldwide to destroy the country they live in (and yes not just the US). I live in the US, too but am concerned about terrorism worldwide as well as in our local streets. Al Qaeda has nothing on groups like the Bloods and the Crips who are now being found in places like the Phillippines. The LA's gangs are not just the US and LA problem anymore, they are the world's. Edited by beatlechick, Jul 15 2008, 01:10 AM.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 15 2008, 01:06 AM Post #1343 |
|
Next question: Can someone explain to me the humour and satire in THIS and why it isn't offensive? I do hope those who jumped up and down about the "General betray us" ad will be as vocal in their outrage over this, since they care so much about standards. And while we're at it.... what liberal media? |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 15 2008, 01:12 AM Post #1344 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
And with the US flag burning in the fireplace. Nice job New Yawker! |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 15 2008, 01:18 AM Post #1345 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Here's the article that goes along with this picture. Shame on the New Yorker for doing that! I'm not an Obama supporter but don't think he and his wife deserve that! "Liberal" media? All I can say is THANK GOD it didn't come from a conservative source!
Edited by Bag O' Nails, Jul 15 2008, 01:18 AM.
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 15 2008, 01:20 AM Post #1346 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
I agree the gang problems are very big. If we're not careful, our country will implode on its own.
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 15 2008, 01:28 AM Post #1347 |
|
Which is exactly what the terrorists want!
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| maccascruff | Jul 15 2008, 01:31 AM Post #1348 |
|
Sing the Changes
|
I find this totally offensive. Somebody in my Obama group emailed the New Yorker and was told it was satire and the magazine with the cover would stay on the stands. There is nothing funny about it. It is highly offensive and should not be on the stands. And I will be proudly voting for Obama.
|
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 15 2008, 01:44 AM Post #1349 |
|
To quote from the brilliant Drop the Dead Donkey on the subject of irony: Just because you know it's crap doesn't stop it being crap! |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 15 2008, 01:50 AM Post #1350 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
Thank you, Bill, for that! I think the bigger issue than Al Qaeda is the growing gang problem and not just in the US. The gangs strike fear wherever they are. Innocent people, literally, get caught in the crossfire. Sure not on as grand a scale as WTC but just think that the fear they strike is longer lasting and more far-reaching than anything Al Qaeda does. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 15 2008, 02:04 AM Post #1351 |
|
It's all about economies of scale. There are more people who fear air travel than car travel despite it being statistically the safest for of travel. That's because when there's an air crash that kills 100 people it's big spectacular news. But in any given week, far more people are killed on the road and it's, "Meh! sh*t happens!" Likewise, if Arabs kill 100 Americans it's an attack on the American way of life but if 200 Americans kill each other..... well, what can you do? Some might suggest that IS the American way of life.
Edited by Bill, Jul 15 2008, 02:17 AM.
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 15 2008, 02:06 AM Post #1352 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
A while back, we were discussing the Muslim radicals using their faith as their shields for war with the rest. I have been thinking of this song a lot lately and it definitely fits in this discussion It is a Bob Dylan song, sung brilliantly here by Joan Baez in 1966, called With God on Our Side. Here are the words: Oh my name it is nothin' My age it means less The country I come from Is called the Midwest I's taught and brought up there The laws to abide And that land that I live in Has God on its side. Oh the history books tell it They tell it so well The cavalries charged The Indians fell The cavalries charged The Indians died Oh the country was young With God on its side. Oh the Spanish-American War had its day And the Civil War too Was soon laid away And the names of the heroes I's made to memorize With guns in their hands And God on their side. Oh the First World War, boys It closed out its fate The reason for fighting I never got straight But I learned to accept it Accept it with pride For you don't count the dead When God's on your side. When the Second World War Came to an end We forgave the Germans And we were friends Though they murdered six million In the ovens they fried The Germans now too Have God on their side. I've learned to hate Russians All through my whole life If another war starts It's them we must fight To hate them and fear them To run and to hide And accept it all bravely With God on my side. But now we got weapons Of the chemical dust If fire them we're forced to Then fire them we must One push of the button And a shot the world wide And you never ask questions When God's on your side. In a many dark hour I've been thinkin' about this That Jesus Christ Was betrayed by a kiss But I can't think for you You'll have to decide Whether Judas Iscariot Had God on his side. So now as I'm leavin' I'm weary as Hell The confusion I'm feelin' Ain't no tongue can tell The words fill my head And fall to the floor If God's on our side He'll stop the next war. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Adilah | Jul 15 2008, 02:12 AM Post #1353 |
|
Regardless of what Americans think of Muslims, the outcome of this election will not affect my life in any way. |
| "We call 10 American deaths a catastrophe. One hundred European deaths are a tragedy. One thousand Asian deaths are a shame. And 10,000 African deaths we call a Monday." - Lissa (1981-2007) ÇáÓáÇã Úáíßã æÑÍãÉ Çááå æÈÑßÇÊå | |
![]() |
|
| fab4fan | Jul 15 2008, 04:25 AM Post #1354 |
![]()
Caretaker
|
Good catch. As smart as Obama is you would think that he would highlight that both his dads were Muslim and as such he has a better understanding of it and that wouldn't be a bad thing in this enviornment. Edited by fab4fan, Jul 15 2008, 04:26 AM.
|
| Mnisthiti mou Kurie! | |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 15 2008, 06:50 AM Post #1355 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
I think he should point out that his foreign policy experience comes from living outside the United States but that wouldn't sit well with Americans who think anything outside America is bad. You don't want people in the voting booth thinking maybe his father wasn't a terrorist and maybe he was. Who knows? Can we really afford to take the chance? |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 15 2008, 11:01 PM Post #1356 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Well well well...what a difference a day makes. Now we find out the real reason behind this cover from the New Yorker... The editor of the magazine today said that it's intended message was misunderstood. "It's not a satire OF Obama; it's a satire about the attacks and rumors ABOUT Obama." Lest I quote from an evil news source like FOX , here's what was said on MSNBC:Tanya Ackerman: "If the cartoon made clear that this was a right-wing machine at work; if Rush Limbaugh was painting that cartoon; then it would've been much funnier and we would've gotten it." Oh, we would've "gotten it," alright! Can you imagine the outcry from the left if it came from a right-wing source?? "it would've been funnier?" Oh yeah, it would've been hilarious! Is this woman serious?? So the smear was actually meant to stereotype the conservatives as racist, sexist throwbacks. Let's be clear here. The New Yorker does not want McCain in the office, but in their lame attempt to smear the "right-wing machine," they are the ones with egg on their face! Edited by Bag O' Nails, Jul 15 2008, 11:15 PM.
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 15 2008, 11:59 PM Post #1357 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
Obviously no one watched Anderson Cooper on CNN or else they would've seen the outcry by James Carville and William Bennett, radio talk show host. They devoted nearly 2 hours of his show to this. The excuse that has been pointed out here was talked about last night. No one was laughing, no one thought it was satire, no one liked it one bit and really criticized, and rightly so, the New Yorker. The criticism was played on all the talk shows, radio and tv, and news shows here in LA. The only news story that overshadowed this is the Indymac/FNMA/FHLMC fiascos. Those stories have a much heavier hit than anything else, including the 300 new fires that were spotted in Northern California yesterday. No the smears were not directed at the Conservatives but at the stupid rumors of Obama being Muslim and Michelle being a terrorist. Plain and simple. If you take it as a smear about Conservatives, than wake up and listen to what the editor really said. It is what was said on the news last night, including Fox, and is still being said today. I do not condone what the New Yorker did. It was stupid but I have to admit that it took me awhile to understand what they were getting at. |
| |
![]() |
|
| maccascruff | Jul 16 2008, 01:06 AM Post #1358 |
|
Sing the Changes
|
No matter what the New Yorker says, the cover was not in the least bit funny. I did watch Anderson Cooper last night. And Bill Bennett is a convervative. Heidi, would you like to see Cindy McCain with an AK47 in her hand on a magazine cover? Obama is just saying how much he respects Muslims on Larry King now. He said the cover was an insult to all Muslims. Adilah, I doubt very much if the election will change your life--unless the new president decides to invade your country. |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 16 2008, 01:13 AM Post #1359 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
So sorry to pass on "old news," but I didn't watch any tv last night. I only heard this on talk radio and the internet today! It's quite obvious that nobody on either side of the campaign liked this "satire" (And what about Tanya Ackerman's remark...saying "it would've been funnier" and "they would've got it" if Limbaugh was shown painting it)! You mean only THEN it would've been okay to laugh at it? I bet it would've been absolutely hysterical seeing Rush or Hannity painting that kind of picture! Granted the editor didn't directly accuse conservatives, but it was certainly implied, and everyone else "heard" it loud and clear! For you to say that it was not an attack on conservatives is absolutely incorrect! Just whom do you think this cover was attempting to show was thinking Obama was a Muslim, Michelle a terrorist, and unpatriotic? And why? Dan Abrams said, "...doesn't Barack Obama have to make it absolutely clear he is not a Muslim...that he does not have any ties to terrorists that some conspiracy wack-jobs on the right want to suggest?" If you listen to this you will clearly see that it's obvious to everyone here what the motive was and to whom it was truly directed towards: http://www.truveo.com/Cartoon-controversy/id/57231603 Edited by Bag O' Nails, Jul 16 2008, 01:21 AM.
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 16 2008, 01:17 AM Post #1360 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
No, Linda, and nowhere did I say that I thought the magazine cover was appropriate or accurate! Actually if you go back and read my other posts, you will see that I thought it was done in poor taste! |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| maccascruff | Jul 16 2008, 01:21 AM Post #1361 |
|
Sing the Changes
|
I haven't read every single post. I'm glad you said this, Heidi. |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 16 2008, 01:28 AM Post #1362 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
Sorry I don't see it as you do. I have heard Conservatives say the exact same thing as the panel here is saying. William Bennett said the same exact thing, almost verbatim, as the older man with black hair (sorry didn't catch his name) when he said that if you have to explain a joke it just isn't a joke. Rush Limbaugh is not the spokesperson for Conservatives, he is a spokesperson for the Right-Wing Whack Jobs. Right-Wing Whack Jobs are not necessarily associated with true Conservatives just like the Left-Wing Whackos are not necessarily associated with Liberals. Face it, so many people still believe Obama as being a Muslim. No matter what Church he belongs to some nutcases will always associate him with Muslim radicals regardless of the fact that he is, was born a Christian. Nowhere was it implied that this was directed at Conservatives. That is just the way you are taking it. It was supposed to be directed at the less-informed. If that is a Conservative, than so-be-it! |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 16 2008, 01:40 AM Post #1363 |
|
You needed cable news to explain THAT to you? I though it was pretty obvious from the outset. However, by not drawing attention to the attempted satire, it had the added "benefit" of pandering to right wing lunatics. After all, their money is as good as anyone else's right? Two words kids: own goal. So is it still shameful? I CAN think things through for myself, thank you very much.
Edited by Bill, Jul 16 2008, 01:42 AM.
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 16 2008, 01:50 AM Post #1364 |
|
THEN it would be an accurate representation of what's going on. The Limbaughs and Hannitys of the world attempt to paint that picture every day, hence the ridiculous misinformation that as underpinned some of the posts on this very thread. Creeps like that deserve no respect. It's the business they're in. You live by lies and cheap shots, you die by lies and cheap shots.
If it's obvious, then we don't need anyone to explain it to us. What is being touted as "obvious" today is nothing I didn't know when I first asked the question but nobody mentioned it then. George Harrison said it best. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 16 2008, 02:01 AM Post #1365 |
|
Two hours? Oh for pity's sake, I'm sorry I mentioned it. Obviously it's notable, but two hours of windbagging about this, on something that proports to be a serious news program? Didn't anything else happen in the world? Satire gone wrong? No. Marketing gone very, very right! They get plausible deniability to the left, pandering to the right and two hours of free publicity on CNN. Genius! Don't ask me what lame cable show told me that. I worked it out all on my very own.
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 16 2008, 05:27 AM Post #1366 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
What I said was "obvious" was the intentions of the article and I was trying to explain this to Cathy. Maybe you should've enlightened me when you first posted the original question...excuse me if I didn't "get it" like you did by "thinking for yourself!" No offense, but it's comments like this that that make me feel like I'm spinning my wheels trying to discuss things. Edited by Bag O' Nails, Jul 16 2008, 05:40 AM.
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 16 2008, 06:11 AM Post #1367 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
Bill, it wasn't the entire 2 hours. AC's show is only 2 hours and the bigger news story was talked about, that being the banking crisis. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 16 2008, 06:16 AM Post #1368 |
|
None taken, or intended. But I'm not going to apologise for not telling you what to think. Something I find a real drag (and I'm not talking about you here Heidi) is the way so many people regurgitate pundits' comments as a substitute for actually thinking things through and discussing things. Too many people just let their favourite blowhard do all the thinking for them. If I want to know what Bill Kristol or Rachel Maddow thank, I know where to find that. But I'm not talking to them. I want to discuss things with my friends here. Full disclosure: I first learnt of that picture from crooksandliars.com - a political commentary site. I could have linked to that and many other sites that have commented on the issue, but I chose not to because that would colour people's own thoughts on the matter. That's why I linked only to the picture itself, so that people could make up their own minds. And I think the fact that a lot of pretty clever people don't immediately see it as a satire on right wing smears says an awful lot. I also don't think it merits two hours of news time. I thought Anderson Cooper was supposed to be a serious journalist. But who needs journalism when you can wring two hours of airtime out of this kind of manufactured controversy? And yes, I know I'm the one who brought it up, but I had no idea that people were making this big a deal of it. My ignorance on that score has been corrected and I thank you all for that- depressing as it is. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 16 2008, 06:19 AM Post #1369 |
|
So it was Bennett's show that devoted two hours? Again, my ignorance has been corrected. Still, two hours of talk radio doesn't come cheap. Imagine if the New Yorker had had to pay for it! |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| ThirdHarmony | Jul 16 2008, 10:54 AM Post #1370 |
|
Just to clarify - not that there would have been or should have been any problem at all with Obama's father and step-father being Muslim - both of them were Muslim only inasmuch as they were "born into the faith" (which is hardly a guaranteed indicator of personal faith). Obama's father left the religion at a young age and considered himself an atheist. Lolo Soetoro (Obama's mothers second husband) was not a practicing religious person - much like Obama's mother (described as a secular humanist agnostic by family members, although she was born into a Christian family). None of these people are alive today to comment on all the media attention, so any in-depth "conclusions" about them remain speculation. From reading Obama's (IMO very well written) 1995 autobiography "Dreams from my father" - I get the distinct impression that his own religious opinions are more the result of his personal spiritual quest rather than having a parent's or someone else's beliefs automatically carbon copied onto himself. Speaking as a non-religious person, I find it somehow reassuring that he has had plenty experience of dealing with loved ones of several different faiths and non-faiths as it might help provide a more nuanced and calm relationship between his own faith and others. Edited by ThirdHarmony, Jul 16 2008, 11:02 AM.
|
|
"My definition of a free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular." - Adlai Stevenson "Say what you will about the sweet miracle of unquestioning faith. I consider the capacity for it terrifying." - Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 16 2008, 12:56 PM Post #1371 |
|
No argument from me on worldly experience being a good thing. But he's up against the perverted logic of people who write garbage like THIS. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| ThirdHarmony | Jul 16 2008, 01:36 PM Post #1372 |
|
Yikes, what a hideously ignorant article, and it's stunning how it openly attempts to position itself on the intellectually dim side of its own imagined divide. Talk about patronizing the reader! |
|
"My definition of a free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular." - Adlai Stevenson "Say what you will about the sweet miracle of unquestioning faith. I consider the capacity for it terrifying." - Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 16 2008, 10:49 PM Post #1373 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
(the above was Beatlechick's post) I was pondering over why Americans are so much more consumed over radical Islamic terrorism vs gang terrorism. Here's what I concluded... 1. While gang violence is truly terrible and definitely a form of terrorism, they don't have a defined plan to destroy our country as a nation. Islamic terrorists do; they boldly burn our flags & have mass demonstrations in their countries. They have threatened to use dirty bombs, nuclear devices, etc. and due to the threat of mass destruction of key places (like nuclear facilities, electrical grids, etc) they pose a much greater threat of shutting us down. 2. Gang violence is not for political profit; rather it's for personal gain. They need our people in this country to purchase their drugs in order to financially become wealthy. 3. Gangs do not hide behind their religion to give creedence to their reasons why they are doing what they do. Despite the argument that Bill gave that terrorism is politically motivated, Islamic groups have repeatedly used their religion as an excuse for what they do. Unfortunately, this puts Muslims of any race into a pool of uneasiness and mistrust among many people...not that it's right but it's what has happened. These were just some thoughts I had as to why Islamic terrorism is more of a frightening threat than gang violence. |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 17 2008, 01:14 AM Post #1374 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
I don't know about William Bennett's show I just know that he and James Carville were on AC 360 off and on for 2 hours. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 17 2008, 01:22 AM Post #1375 |
|
I think that's an excellent description of the differences (apart from our obvious disagreement on point 3) but I think it's interesting that you say it's a "more frightening" threat than a greater threat. It gets back to my air travel analogy. More people are frightened of air travel than road travel but anyone who has crunched the numbers knows they have far more chance of being killed or injured in a car accident than on a plane - and that's factoring in the assumption that people will be travelling by air. You only have to browse this board and people's own experiences here to see that statistic born out. In the same way, you have far more chance of being horribly murdered by your own countrymen than by any international terrorist, regardless of their professed or alleged motivation. That's provable. So the fear of international terrorism over domestic violence may have its reasons, but the reasons are irrational - unless you care less about being killed than who you are killed by. When it comes down to it, the gangs may not have a political agenda or any kind of religion but if they get you, you won't be any less dead. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 17 2008, 01:23 AM Post #1376 |
|
Deleted User
|
What about Tim McVeigh? While so busy chasing Islamics lets let the blonde haired white Americans show you what terrorism is. Which is why George W Bush is the biggest terrorist of them all. |
|
|
| Bill | Jul 17 2008, 01:39 AM Post #1377 |
|
Don't forget he was also a gulf war veteran. And his personal justification for what he did was the Waco siege. Just imagine government agencies attacking and killing men, women and children just because of what they believe. Time for liberation I say! And there are some who still insist McVeigh was involved with al Qaeda. Give me a break! And hey, never mind even domestic terrorism. More people have been killed by government incompetence in the last 8 years. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 17 2008, 01:47 AM Post #1378 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
What hogwash. I live pretty damn near gang territory. I have known, and worked with, gang and ex-gang members. They're not in it for wealth, though for some that does happen, they're in it for multiple reasons. 1) acceptance amongst their peers, 2) it's either join up or pay up (paying up is either with getting beat up within an inch of your life or just plain with your life) as commanded by the leader, 3) there is nothing else to do, no supervision (like Barack Obama has been stating taking responsibility for their own lives) because their sole support - mothers, sisters, or grandmothers is working. I have known elementary school teachers, teaching 8 year olds, who were threatened by one of their pupils because they were displaying gang signs and clothing and were told to stop. Gang activity is growing among 5 & 6 year olds who are stealing, beating up, and shooting guns just like their elders do and praised for it. East Los Angeles, Watts, Pacoima, Van Nuys, Burbank, North Hollywood, etc are not anywhere near being rich neighborhoods yet all of them have minor to major gang activity. Some of these are amongst the poorest depressed neighborhoods in the US. I know, I lived and worked in a couple of those hoods. I've been conversing with a gang member these last few days. He's in it for the violence and the terror, as are most gang members. Not for the money. Gangs are not just a form of terrorism, they are the highest form of terrorism. I defy just about anyone to walk down a street in East Los Angeles at night. Some of the neighborhoods there are so unsafe that not even cops want to go there without back-up. Institutionalized gang members are so ingrained with violence and hatred they couldn't give a sh*t who is there, they will shoot. They have shot at the cops, firemen, the National Guard (when they were actually helping in the US and not in Iraq), EMT's (who will not now go in certain areas without police escort the same as fire trucks). I'm sorry but you are soooooooo wrong about gangs. They have more weapon at their disposal, talking groups like the Bloods and Crips, than just your garden variety AK47's and Saturday Night Specials. They may not have blown anything up, yet, but they do set fire to people's houses and have been arrested with bomb making materials. You willl think what you want but as you do that come to Pacoima, Watts (which has cleaned up a bit), Compton, parts of North Hollywood and Burbank, all of Van Nuys and walk around at night especially during a heatwave and you tell me how secure you feel. And thank you Bill. You put it very well when you said you are no less dead when killed by a gang member. Edited by beatlechick, Jul 17 2008, 01:49 AM.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 17 2008, 01:56 AM Post #1379 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
Here is something that I saw earlier today. What bullshite this is! Controversial Billboard ![]() Controversial billboard sparks outrage Wednesday, July 16, 2008 ORANGE COUNTY, FL -- A controversial billboard in Florida has a picture of the burning World Trade Center and the message, "Please Don't Vote for a Democrat." The man who paid for the ad says he's trying to help Republicans, but officials with both political parties are calling the billboard inappropriate. There are billboards up and down busy Orange Blossom Trail, but this at John Young Parkway one sticks out. "Just looking at it, I'm not thinking about Democrat or Republican, I'm thinking about the twin towers and all the people killed," said resident Mary Anderson. The ad went up last week and is causing quite a reaction. Why use the twin towers for that purpose?" Anderson questioned. The man behind the billboard is Mike Meehan, a St. Cloud businessman and musician. His website advertises a CD and music video titled "The Republican Song," with the chorus, "Don't vote for a Democrat." He's selling CDs for $ 5. "This is a blatant exploitation of that terrible tragedy for political and, perhaps even worse, personal gain," said Bill Robinson, Orange County Democratic Party Chair. Orange County Democrats are calling for the billboard to come down and the local Republican Party has said the ad is "inappropriate." Meehan hadn't returned calls or e-mails Monday afternoon, but some are defending his right to free speech. "They can have their opinion. It's a free country, if they want to pay for the ad. I'm sure it's expensive," said resident Louis Champeau. The company that owns the billboard, Beech Outdoor Advertising, views it as a fundamental first amendment issue and for that reason wouldn't sensor the ad. The billboard will be up until after the November election. Beech Outdoor Advertising declined to say how much the billboard costs to rent. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 17 2008, 02:02 AM Post #1380 |
|
Just a few questions: Who was president on Sept. 11? Who held congress on Sept. 11? Who had the senate on Sept. 11? Who was mayor on Sept. 11? Vote Republican? They let it happen! Rudy 9iu11iana claims that after he saw the towers fall he said, "Thank God George Bush is out president." Funny how he never saw the towers STAND and say "Thank God Bill Clinton is our president." I'll never understand some people's priorities.
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| maccascruff | Jul 17 2008, 02:15 AM Post #1381 |
|
Sing the Changes
|
Just to clarify, AC 360 is pretty much a repeat of the first hour in the second hour unless there is breaking news. I saw Bennett and Carville on that show. I don't know if Bennett has a radio show. I am thankful that my boss is on vacation and I don't have to listen to Rush Limbaugh this week.
|
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 17 2008, 02:22 AM Post #1382 |
|
Let's see if the first amendment also applies when someone wants to put up a billboard of a giant erect penis and the slogan "f*ck me daily," (without the asterisk). It would be no more offensive than this. Larry Flint, your moment awaits. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 17 2008, 05:22 PM Post #1383 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Yes, there will always be the occasional Tim VcVey's that cause a great deal of horror ; but so do serial killers, for that matter. We've had our share of horrific stories of school shootings, too. Again, the difference is that Islamic terrorist groups pose a "greater threat" overall because of their recruitment efforts and numbers all over the country. And if you don't think they are recruiting, just work in a maximum security prison for awhile...my good friend who is a security guard tells me stories that are sobering.... |
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 17 2008, 05:25 PM Post #1384 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Typical. Let's blame whoever was in office for a terrorist attack!
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bag O' Nails | Jul 17 2008, 05:36 PM Post #1385 |
|
MaccaMomma
|
Cathy, You haven't told me anything that I already don't know about gangs. What I said is not a bunch of "hogwash." Point #3 did not include the psychological reasonings of why a person is in a gang. I totally realize that there are other reasons why a person belongs to a gang; it's not strictly for money. The need to belong is a strong thing; people who live in such dangerous areas and in poverty don't have a lot of opportunities in this life and make hard choices to be in gangs or be beaten/killed. I don't have to walk around in Compton to know this, thank you. No matter where you live in CA, there are gang issues. I stand by what I said earlier; while gangs are a horrible form of terrorism, people whose lives are not affected on a daily basis by these gangs are not as worried about them as they are about having their entire country's electrical grid being destroyed and then not being able to get food, water, money, etc. Simultaneous mass destruction is a much greater fear among most Americans by a group you can't identify by the city they're from or the colors that they're wearing. Edited by Bag O' Nails, Jul 17 2008, 05:38 PM.
|
![]() One sweet dream came true....London & Liverpool '08 | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 18 2008, 12:30 AM Post #1386 |
|
ABSOLUTELY! Let's blame the ones who ignored the warnings they were given by the previous administration. Let's blame the ones who didn't translate the coded warnings received prior to the attacks until the week after the attacks. Let's blame the ones who were too thick to know what "BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO ATTACK INSIDE THE U.S." meant. Let's blame the ones who didn't read security briefings. Let's blame the ones who deliberately took counter-terrorism off the agenda. Let's blame the ones who put the command centre inside a known terrorist target. What's not to get about that? If the people in office are not to blame for the most comprehensive and humiliating security lapse in the nation's history, then who the hell is? I'll say it again. They let it happen by being asleep at the wheel. If I'm wrong, show me where I'm wrong. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 18 2008, 01:25 AM Post #1387 |
|
What people should fear and what they do fear are two completely different things. Most people fear being blown up far more than they fear things like diabetes heart disease, and they'll happily tell you all about it over a Big Mac, coffee and a cigarette. These things kill more people than terrorism and gang violence combined but no-one is scaremongering about them. Why not? I suggest it's because a heart attack doesn't go BOOM! on television. It's a poor idea to assess the level of threat based on people's irrational fears. People can fear terrorism all they like. That doesn't make it a greater threat than gang violence. People can fear gangs all they like. That doesn't make it a greater cumulative threat than poor lifestyles. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1562978,00.html And I'm not saying that I'm this great rational thinker. I am petrified of heights and if I get water over my nose I think I'm drowning. I am, what is technically described as, a wimp! But the thing is, I know I'm a wimp. I know my fears, however real they are to me, are mostly irrational. And when I really think about it, my waistline is a bigger threat to my life than falling to a grisly death from a great height. Or being blown up by terrorists. |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 18 2008, 01:28 AM Post #1388 |
|
Deleted User
|
I don't think anyone could predict what happened. It was a terrorist attack. It's easy to point mistakes, blame this and that person after the tragedy. I don't think you would make different if you were the President, or whoever you want to blame. After September 11, Spain suffered a terrorist attack too. |
|
|
| beatlechick | Jul 18 2008, 01:50 AM Post #1389 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
I'm not at all worried about the country's electrical grid going out. We're in summer mode here. We get threatened by blackouts and brownouts when it gets hot. In my City our power just goes out with no warning. When we have earthquakes power can be out for days, the last big quake we had some neighborhoods had no power for nearly 2 weeks. I fear mother nature's wrath more than I do any terrorist. We never know when she is going to strike. You should worry about gangs more. They are not just located in California anymore. They have branched out nationwide AND worldwide. Just because they are not in your neighborhood does not mean they don't exist. in my City we have gangs but they are less a problem than regular everyday folk. We have little tagging and gang violence but we do have drunk drivers and the Ronald Reagan Library, which is on the last target list for terrorism. Seeing our local news and newspapers, I stand by my "hogwash" you may think you know the terror that gangs strike but it appears you don't really know. When you have law enforcement afraid to go into certain areas at night, you know it's bad. Our own Gov't can't contain the national gang problem, how the hell are they going to contain a international gang of terrorists? Hell this administration can't even help our own people when it's needed. Why?!? |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 18 2008, 02:06 AM Post #1390 |
|
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report_Ch8.htm |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 18 2008, 02:11 AM Post #1391 |
|
Deleted User
|
I think governors and mayors should be responsible for the gang problem. |
|
|
| Bill | Jul 18 2008, 02:15 AM Post #1392 |
|
Agreed. As my correspondent in New Orleans says, there's plenty of blame to go around. The problem is that each layer of government passes the buck to the other. But that's none of my business.
|
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| beatlechick | Jul 18 2008, 02:24 AM Post #1393 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
How about the part, under sworn testimony in front of the Senate, Condi Rice was asked about the memo Bin Laden determined to attack inside the US, and she said that it was believed that he would attack US installations! Bin Laden Determined to attack Inside the US White House releases bin Laden memo Presidential briefing was at center of Rice's testimony (CNN) -- The White House declassified and released Saturday the daily intelligence briefing delivered to President Bush a month before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The declassified intelligence report said the FBI had detected "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." The names of countries that supplied the CIA with intelligence have been removed from the memo dealing with Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and dated August 6, 2001. "We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a [redacted] service in 1998 saying that bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to secure the release of 'Blind Sheikh' Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists," the memo says in part. Rahman is serving a life sentence for conspiring to assassinate Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and to blow up New York landmarks. The White House said the presidential daily briefing, or PDB, was requested by Bush, who sought information about the possibility of an al Qaeda attack in the United States. "The PDB article did not warn of the 9/11 attacks," the White House said in a statement released Saturday night. "Although the PDB referred to the possibility of hijackings, it did not discuss the possible use of planes as weapons." The memo, titled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S.," had been described by the White House as a largely historical document with scant information about domestic al Qaeda threats. The memo includes intelligence on al Qaeda threats as recent as three months before the attacks. Highlights of the report include: • An intelligence report received in May 2001 indicating that al Qaeda was trying to send operatives to the United States through Canada to carry out an attack using explosives. That information had been passed on to intelligence and law enforcement agencies. • An allegation that al Qaeda had been considering ways to hijack American planes to win the release of operatives who had been arrested in 1998 and 1999. • An allegation that bin Laden was set on striking the United States as early as 1997 and through early 2001. • Intelligence suggesting that suspected al Qaeda operatives were traveling to and from the United States, were U.S. citizens, and may have had a support network in the country. • A report that at least 70 FBI investigations were under way in 2001 regarding possible al Qaeda cells/terrorist-related operations in the United States. The two-page document became the highlight of national security adviser Condoleezza Rice's testimony Thursday before the commission investigating the attacks. Rice told the commission Thursday that the briefing included mostly "historical information" and that most of the threat information known in the summer of 2001 referred to overseas targets. She said she did not recall any reports about al Qaeda using aircraft as weapons before September 11. Former counterterrorism aide Richard Clarke had testified two weeks before that the White House had ignored warnings about bin Laden's terrorist organization. Clarke said the Bush administration, including Rice, was aware of al Qaeda threats but did not treat them as "urgent." The commission asked that the presidential daily briefing be declassified after Rice's testimony. "This was the commission's hope," spokesman Al Felzenberg said Saturday. "The White House has now complied. The White House agreed to release the documents. This is what the commission had hoped." The August briefing was delivered to Bush at his ranch in Crawford, Texas. Some commission members said the administration was given enough information about bin Laden's intentions and capabilities to have warned the public that an attack was possible. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 18 2008, 02:55 AM Post #1394 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
Here's a question for the Americans [since we've established what happens outside America doesn't matter]. How many times have "Islamic" terrorists [such a stupid phrase] killed people on American soil? How many times have American terrorists killed people on American soil? Which is the greater number? Which is the greater threat to your way of life? Ok, maybe that was more than 1 question. |
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| maccascruff | Jul 18 2008, 03:35 AM Post #1395 |
|
Sing the Changes
|
Ah, but they are valid questions, Mia. As far as I am concerned, Bush's invasion of Iraq was a terrorist attack and it has killed far more people than the 9/11 attacks. Bill, thanks for the testimony from the 9/11 commission report. You saved me some research. |
![]() |
|
| Bill | Jul 20 2008, 02:32 AM Post #1396 |
|
I love this guy! http://youtube.com/watch?v=wW1NUQZ0qew (language warning) |
| Put a puppet on it. | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 20 2008, 03:53 PM Post #1397 |
|
Deleted User
|
Thats funny Bill but I like this one better http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiQJ9Xp0xxU |
|
|
| beatlechick | Jul 20 2008, 05:52 PM Post #1398 |
|
In Paul's Arms!
|
Love it, Tony. Saw some of the Why I'm Voting Democrat and all I can say is they have been pretty pathetic. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mia Culpa | Jul 21 2008, 03:17 AM Post #1399 |
|
This space intentionally left blank.
|
Some of you might want this
|
| If you read my posts backward there's evidence that Paul is dead. | |
![]() |
|
| Jacaranda | Jul 22 2008, 02:31 PM Post #1400 |
![]()
|
Bill is that guy related to you? Excellent.Tony that is superb. Thank you. |
![]() "If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through." General Melchett, Blackadder Goes Forth | |
![]() |
|
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Sign-up Now |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Things We Said Today · Next Topic » |



)




Jesse Jackson is irrelevant to me and not analogous to any point I've been making.

I can't help but wonder why you would surmise I'm ignorant about "the world." Is it because I ask a lot of questions? I'm not uneducated nor am I ignorant; I am curious about how others who live elsewhere see things. I realize racism is not a "good" thing,
but if one lives in another part of the world, don't you think that their perspectives may come from a different point of view? It's obvious you don't want to share where you live; it's your perogative & I guess I really don't care anymore to try and understand you on a more personal level.
You're saying that every question one should ask should be based on only a truthful assumptions? I've always been taught there is not such a thing as a dumb question. Now we're qualifying the types of questions people ask!
let me connect the dots getting back to the candidates by posting a link to this article by columnist Thomas Sowell about Obama vs McCain:
Can you imagine the outcry from the left if it came from a right-wing source??
Is this woman serious??





2:01 PM Jul 11