PokéFiends |
|
PokéFiends is an open and expansive multi-region Pokémon roleplay that welcomes both canon and original characters. From the regions in the main games, the anime and side games, and even a bit more, you can travel anywhere. Be wary, a darkness lurks in the night, a sinister creature haunts the edges of the moonlight. Turmoil brews, traveler, so take your first step with caution. |
Four months ago, terror held the world in stand still. The attacks on both Saffron and Castelia have concluded... and despite the growing darkness, the people of the world band together to throw an event in the spirit of world unity and the courage to stand against this new foe.
![]() |
The season is currently Spring. There winter snows have thawed and new growth springs up across the world. Periodically, chill remains in the air, but never for long does it hang about. |
| Welcome to PokéFiends. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Legendaries | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Apr 29 2012, 04:45 PM (393 Views) | |
| MizuJakkaru | Apr 29 2012, 04:45 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Believe in you, who believes in yourself.
![]()
|
![]() Does anyone have any interest in being able to claim a second Legendary Pokémon? It has been restricted to keep people from being able to collect too many powerful canons, but given that people hardly claim canons in the first place and given we'd need something like 50 players to have all the Legendaries taken, I don't see much harm in upping the limit. Comments, suggestions? |
![]() Characters: Click to Toggle
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Apr 29 2012, 07:41 PM Post #2 |
|
Deleted User
|
Porquoi non, mon cher? (Why not, my dear?) Although with your upcoming/in progress advert spree, we MIGHT have a shortage on our hands. In addition, it's not often that Legendaries are even put into RP; perhaps once site plot gets on a roll, people may be swamped with the need to post with multiple legendaries, not to mention their prerequisite canon and possibly an OC. (hypothetically.) ..... /calls dibs on Mew |
|
|
| Tempest | Apr 29 2012, 07:52 PM Post #3 |
![]()
*Will Role Play for food*
![]()
|
I think it would be pretty cool to be able to have a second legendary. If more people come on and start asking why thats allowed, though, it might start to become an issue. |
|
"At the end of the day things will always get better. If it isn't better, then the day hasn't ended yet." Canon: ~Molly Hale~ Original: ~Bella Willow~ ~Monica Avalon~ ~Ferra Risa~ ~Ezra Mynol~ ~Carson Tezzler~ ~Jamie Lyles~ Mystery Dungeon: ~Ralts (Oliver)~ Legendary Pokémon: ~Mew~ ~Victini~ | |
![]() |
|
| Paradox | Apr 29 2012, 08:01 PM Post #4 |
|
Hugs you in your sleep.
![]()
|
They'd need to be constantly active. And having a Legendary pretty much means they can get yanked around by the story wherever it takes them. As long as they're willing to bend when it's called for, having two might not be so bad. But honestly, I thin it should be limited to Major and Minor. For example, Ho-oh is a major legendary, but the legendary birds are relatively minor in comparison. Same with say..Darkrai and Victini. Victini's legendary, but he's not a major aspect of the world. |
|
Oh ZUN, bless this thy Mini-Hakkero; that with it, thou mayest spark thine enemies to tiny p blocks, in thy mercy. Characters BvS
| |
![]() |
|
| Raal | May 1 2012, 12:43 PM Post #5 |
![]()
|
I rather like the idea. the major and minor idea has its merits, but we also have to keep in mind that some legendaries can't have more than one, because SOMEONES bound to try to have two mewtwos or something. we'd need to establish just how many of any given kind there could be, on the ones that are considered 'major' anyways. |
|
Spoiler: click to toggle
| |
![]() |
|
| MizuJakkaru | May 2 2012, 04:09 AM Post #6 |
![]()
Believe in you, who believes in yourself.
![]()
|
Most being considered "majors" are singular in the first place. Things like like Giratina, Mewtwo and such are all singular, and that's been defined in the rules for ages. xD Anything that has a multiple that has majors has been either canonical proven, like Lugia and Mew, or has been spread too thin over the canons for them to not be multiple (like Kyogre, Groudon and Rayquazza). There's only a few others, like Heatran. In short, that's been clarified already, and wouldn't change with the shift to allowing people to have two. I suppose that's the other question, is if we should allow two different people to play the same species of legendary. |
![]() Characters: Click to Toggle
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Announcement Archive · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:29 PM Jul 11
|
Affiliates |
|
|
||
<< |
|
|













2:29 PM Jul 11
<<