Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to The Yankee Zone. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
over/under week 1 giants-cardinals predictions
Topic Started: Sep 8 2005, 05:55 PM (146 Views)
PavanosBalls
Unregistered

eli manning 200 yards passing

over or under
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Njdevils350
Member Avatar
Obey My Dog
Members
It better be over
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rsj23terp

Members
I say under.

13-23, 180 yards, 2 TD, INT
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
VICTORious
Member Avatar

Members
over 250
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Strider
Member Avatar
Legend
VC_Moderator
Me being me, I'm going with the under.

16-25, 180 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT

17-13, Giants
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
PavanosBalls
Unregistered

i say over.

kurt warner 2 turnovers. over or under
Quote Post Goto Top
 
MastaR316
Member Avatar
C-C-C-C-C-Combo Breaker
Members
Over

Strahan will rape him and make him cough up the ball, and one of our players will recover the fumble.

Also, he will INT it at least once in this game.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mattingly23
Member Avatar

Moderator
I'll go with over, but slightly over, something like 220 yards passing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ES03

Members
over on both.

Going with about 250-275 for Eli.

and for Warner, I'd say hes going to get 2 turnovers in fubmles alone, not countin 1-2 interceptions.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
VICTORious
Member Avatar

Members
Warner wont have any coverage sacks/fumbles like he did with the giants, his recievers will get open.

I also dont think he will intercept the ball, he is an accurate passer maybe one into.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Njdevils350
Member Avatar
Obey My Dog
Members
Mr. Sunshine
Sep 9 2005, 01:43 PM
Warner wont have any coverage sacks/fumbles like he did with the giants, his recievers will get open.

I also dont think he will intercept the ball, he is an accurate passer maybe one into.

Watch, they are gonna swarm him like small angry insects. Dont wanna get into it now cause its nap time, but its true
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rsj23terp

Members
Mr. Sunshine
Sep 9 2005, 02:43 PM
Warner wont have any coverage sacks/fumbles like he did with the giants, his recievers will get open.

I also dont think he will intercept the ball, he is an accurate passer maybe one into.

Osi's gunna be all over him like a barber on Brenda Warner.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Strider
Member Avatar
Legend
VC_Moderator
Posted Image

Model for the SuperCuts ad campaign.

I'm gonna give Warner 2 turnovers. An INT and a fumble.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Njdevils350
Member Avatar
Obey My Dog
Members
Mr. Sunshine
Sep 9 2005, 01:43 PM
Warner wont have any coverage sacks/fumbles like he did with the giants, his recievers will get open.

I also dont think he will intercept the ball, he is an accurate passer maybe one into.

Ok, Now I tell you



Umenyiora-Clancy-Joseph-Strahan

Davis-Wells-Lynch-Brown-Ross (Edwards)

(Arrington, yeah all 5-9 215 of him.
Ayanbadejo......career backup)

Davis cant block everyone. Warner has always needed time to throw no matter what team hes been on.

They have severe matchup problems. They are going to need to double or triple Strahan, so on a 3 or 4 Man Route look at the assignments.....

Davis-Umenyiora
Wells-Clancy
Joseph-Lynch, Brown
Strahan-Ross, Edwards
Extra Rusher- Ayanbadejo.

We can rush between 4 and 6 all f*ckin day. They cant block us. On a 6 man rush we still have Wilson shading Boldin when hes not doing other things. Peterson can man up on Fitzgerald and you have 2 rovers depending on the pressure scheme/offensive set.

Thats on a 6 man rush.

We're gonna frustrate the hell out of them just bc/ we have the edge on the Line and Wilson doing what you apparently forgot he does in the middle of the field.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Strider
Member Avatar
Legend
VC_Moderator
Good points and I agree with that. I think Warner, except a couple big plays off Will Allen be to so-so w/ the potential of being awful. But you've gotta factor the running game. You know what short RBs do to this defense. I don't know what Ayanbadejo can do (he was a starter at FB for the Ravens for a few years so I assume he's atleast decent) but I think very little of Carlos "8 missed tackles in 1 game vs. the Cowboys w/ Eddie George running it" Emmons and the FB might be able to handle him. Umenyiora's stregnth isn't stopping the run (made a few big plays, but its not consistent and I saw him abused there a bunch of times last year) and Leonard Davis is a mastodon. They could do damage running weak side against us.

This game ain't gonna be easy.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Njdevils350
Member Avatar
Obey My Dog
Members
I never liked Arrington as an NFL prospect, to be honest and he did nothing in the Pre-season. If we stop the run we should have the upperhand most of the game.

And thats why we signed Pierce. I dont think Arrington is going to be a problem. But those are the questoin marks for our run defense this year, Joseph, Clancy and how well Pierce flows to the ball.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Strider
Member Avatar
Legend
VC_Moderator
Njdevils350
Sep 9 2005, 07:14 PM
I never liked Arrington as an NFL prospect, to be honest and he did nothing in the Pre-season. If we stop the run we should have the upperhand most of the game.

And thats why we signed Pierce. I dont think Arrington is going to be a problem. But those are the questoin marks for our run defense this year, Joseph, Clancy and how well Pierce flows to the ball.

I didn't think that highly of him either. Cal isn't one of them "that's the sh*t" programs and you're not supposed to trust RBs who didn't play in the south. However, being a nobody is an advantage agaisnt the Giants. Small backs with speed give us trouble.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
PavanosBalls
Unregistered

jj arrington sounds like one of those names that you could see looking up on footballreference and observe that they averaged 2.9 ypc in a full seasons worth of work, but it also sounds like a guy that could brian westbrook, warrick dunn the giants. im not even sure if hes that type, but from what ive heard, he can break one. he might get 15 carries for 120 yards and 2 tds and not look impressive in the process.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Strider
Member Avatar
Legend
VC_Moderator
J.J. Arrington is the name of a guy who will start 3 games and average 3.4 per carry before getting injured and missing the season. Then he'll spend the remaining 3 years of his career as a backup. <- And that there is the description of just the kinda guy to break two 30+ yard runs on the Giants.

What the f*ck ever happened to Luke Staley? Did whiteboy ever touch the rock - even in exhibition? I actually thought he would've amounted to a decent backup.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Njdevils350
Member Avatar
Obey My Dog
Members
Luke Staley haha....the only place they gonna start a white kid at RB is BYU. Damn mormons
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
« Previous Topic · NY Giants - NY Jets · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Member Legend
Administrator | Moderator | Member | Validating | Banned

Please Visit Our Affiliates





Title banner © 2007 by Venom of The Yankee Zone.
All Rights Reserved.
edge created by tiptopolive of ifsz