|
Hey Doug.........
|
|
Topic Started: Mar 20 2005, 05:43 PM (226 Views)
|
|
timotime
|
Mar 23 2005, 08:57 PM
Post #31
|
- Posts:
- 8,415
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #19
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Mar 23 2005, 08:59 PM
Post #32
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:57 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
galarraga is expendable cause other players like valent, cairo and woodward can play 1st base and big cat hasn't hit a lick this spring, eat me timo!!!
|
|
|
| |
|
timotime
|
Mar 23 2005, 09:09 PM
Post #33
|
- Posts:
- 8,415
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #19
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:59 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:57 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
galarraga is expendable cause other players like valent, cairo and woodward can play 1st base and big cat hasn't hit a lick this spring, eat me timo!!!
Expendable:
- Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess.
If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Mar 23 2005, 09:11 PM
Post #34
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:09 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:59 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:57 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
galarraga is expendable cause other players like valent, cairo and woodward can play 1st base and big cat hasn't hit a lick this spring, eat me timo!!!
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
THE METS HAVE NO USE FOR A 500 YEAR OLD FIRST BASEMAN THAT CAN'T HIT FOR sh*t AND PLAYS SHITTY DEFENSE!!!
|
|
|
| |
|
timotime
|
Mar 23 2005, 09:13 PM
Post #35
|
- Posts:
- 8,415
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #19
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:11 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:09 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:59 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:57 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
galarraga is expendable cause other players like valent, cairo and woodward can play 1st base and big cat hasn't hit a lick this spring, eat me timo!!!
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
THE METS HAVE NO USE FOR A 500 YEAR OLD FIRST BASEMAN THAT CAN'T HIT FOR sh*t AND PLAYS SHITTY DEFENSE!!!
:wtf:
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Mar 23 2005, 09:15 PM
Post #36
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:13 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:11 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:09 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:59 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:57 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
galarraga is expendable cause other players like valent, cairo and woodward can play 1st base and big cat hasn't hit a lick this spring, eat me timo!!!
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
THE METS HAVE NO USE FOR A 500 YEAR OLD FIRST BASEMAN THAT CAN'T HIT FOR sh*t AND PLAYS SHITTY DEFENSE!!! :wtf:
i'm talking about galarraga, the mets have no use for him, valent can come in and play first, the outfield and provides power of the bench!!!
|
|
|
| |
|
timotime
|
Mar 23 2005, 09:17 PM
Post #37
|
- Posts:
- 8,415
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #19
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:15 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:13 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:11 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:09 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:59 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:57 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
galarraga is expendable cause other players like valent, cairo and woodward can play 1st base and big cat hasn't hit a lick this spring, eat me timo!!!
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
THE METS HAVE NO USE FOR A 500 YEAR OLD FIRST BASEMAN THAT CAN'T HIT FOR sh*t AND PLAYS SHITTY DEFENSE!!! :wtf:
i'm talking about galarraga, the mets have no use for him, valent can come in and play first, the outfield and provides power of the bench!!!
- Quote:
-
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
No where do I mention Andres Galarraga.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Mar 23 2005, 09:21 PM
Post #38
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:17 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:15 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:13 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:11 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:09 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:59 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:57 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
galarraga is expendable cause other players like valent, cairo and woodward can play 1st base and big cat hasn't hit a lick this spring, eat me timo!!!
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
THE METS HAVE NO USE FOR A 500 YEAR OLD FIRST BASEMAN THAT CAN'T HIT FOR sh*t AND PLAYS SHITTY DEFENSE!!! :wtf:
i'm talking about galarraga, the mets have no use for him, valent can come in and play first, the outfield and provides power of the bench!!!
- Quote:
-
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
No where do I mention Andres Galarraga.
i'm just stating that galarraga is "expendable" while valent IMO isn't!!! :peace:
|
|
|
| |
|
timotime
|
Mar 23 2005, 09:24 PM
Post #39
|
- Posts:
- 8,415
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #19
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:21 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:17 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:15 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:13 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:11 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:09 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:59 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:57 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
galarraga is expendable cause other players like valent, cairo and woodward can play 1st base and big cat hasn't hit a lick this spring, eat me timo!!!
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
THE METS HAVE NO USE FOR A 500 YEAR OLD FIRST BASEMAN THAT CAN'T HIT FOR sh*t AND PLAYS SHITTY DEFENSE!!! :wtf:
i'm talking about galarraga, the mets have no use for him, valent can come in and play first, the outfield and provides power of the bench!!!
- Quote:
-
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
No where do I mention Andres Galarraga.
i'm just stating that galarraga is "expendable" while valent IMO isn't!!! :peace:
Yes, Galarraga is expendable. And so is Valent. Most bench players fall under that category. For the most part, they're expendable and replaceable.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Mar 23 2005, 09:26 PM
Post #40
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:24 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:21 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:17 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:15 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:13 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 09:11 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 08:09 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:59 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:57 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:54 PM
- timotime
- Mar 23 2005, 07:53 PM
- TheOne
- Mar 23 2005, 08:42 PM
- Njdevils350
- Mar 23 2005, 07:39 PM
unfortunatley your bitchin about the thing you f*cked up
i didn't f*ck up anything, i was right about galarraga, i was right about valent (playing first) and i was right about valent not being expendable since he will be on the team and galarraga won't be!!!
You apparently do not understand the definition of the word expendable.
you guys thought valent was expendable but he's not and never was, the mets were never going to get anything for him, the only guy "expendable" is galarraga, i am right and you guys are wrong, understand that sh*t!!! :peace:
You again misused the word expendable.
galarraga is expendable cause other players like valent, cairo and woodward can play 1st base and big cat hasn't hit a lick this spring, eat me timo!!!
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
THE METS HAVE NO USE FOR A 500 YEAR OLD FIRST BASEMAN THAT CAN'T HIT FOR sh*t AND PLAYS SHITTY DEFENSE!!! :wtf:
i'm talking about galarraga, the mets have no use for him, valent can come in and play first, the outfield and provides power of the bench!!!
- Quote:
-
Expendable: - Quote:
-
Not strictly necessary; dispensable: an expendable budget item; expendable personnel.
Using those terms, Valent fits the exact description of expendable. He certainly has a place on the team, but in no way is he necessary to the Mets sucess. If the Mets were to acquire something useful in return for him, dealing him may make sense. If not, then they should definitely keep him.
No where do I mention Andres Galarraga.
i'm just stating that galarraga is "expendable" while valent IMO isn't!!! :peace:
Yes, Galarraga is expendable. And so is Valent. Most bench players fall under that category. For the most part, they're expendable and replaceable.
nobody besides diaz is gonna replace valent's power of the bench and as we know diaz isn't going to make the team!!!
|
|
|
| |
|
Ray
|
Mar 23 2005, 10:11 PM
Post #41
|
Army Strong
- Posts:
- 29,704
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #31
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
Uh oh, not another Justin-timo-Doug arguments that go on forever. :no1:
|
|
|
| |
|
Njdevils350
|
Mar 23 2005, 10:12 PM
Post #42
|
Obey My Dog
- Posts:
- 13,712
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #40
- Joined:
- January 30, 2004
|
ima sit here with my beer and not say anything
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Mar 23 2005, 10:15 PM
Post #43
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- Metsfan4life
- Mar 23 2005, 09:11 PM
Uh oh, not another Justin-timo-Doug arguments that go on forever. :no1:
LOL those two a-holes love to argue with me and lose!!! :smirk:
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|