|
Yanks are talking with Boras tomorrow
|
|
Topic Started: Jan 7 2005, 12:53 AM (491 Views)
|
|
Yanks473
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:02 PM
Post #61
|
And the Band played on......
- Posts:
- 22,544
- Group:
- VC_Moderator
- Member
- #26
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:00 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 05:42 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 04:39 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 03:56 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:54 PM
- Drew the Jew
- Jan 9 2005, 03:51 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:50 PM
I still say he asks out after 2 years. :evilgrin:
This reads like the A-Rod-Texas situation. With all due respect to the Muets, all things being equal Beltran would never go there. He's forcing himself to go there for the money.
ok sure he is BC, this isn't f*cking texas ok, the mets actually have pitching and they actually have a chance to win now so f*ck you!!!
If you seriously believe that, no offense, but you'd be a f*cking moron.
pitching wins AZZHOLE, the mets have one of the best pitching rotations in the league, the rangers never had any pitching while gayrod was with them, that's just the facts jack!!!
Don't make the Mets sound like they have a playoff caliber staff. They have Pedro and then decent guys. Benson, Zambrano, Trachsel, and Glavine have been average at best the last few seasons.
Glavine also tails off big time in the second half.
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:04 PM
Post #62
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 06:02 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:00 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 05:42 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 04:39 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 03:56 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:54 PM
- Drew the Jew
- Jan 9 2005, 03:51 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:50 PM
I still say he asks out after 2 years. :evilgrin:
This reads like the A-Rod-Texas situation. With all due respect to the Muets, all things being equal Beltran would never go there. He's forcing himself to go there for the money.
ok sure he is BC, this isn't f*cking texas ok, the mets actually have pitching and they actually have a chance to win now so f*ck you!!!
If you seriously believe that, no offense, but you'd be a f*cking moron.
pitching wins AZZHOLE, the mets have one of the best pitching rotations in the league, the rangers never had any pitching while gayrod was with them, that's just the facts jack!!!
Don't make the Mets sound like they have a playoff caliber staff. They have Pedro and then decent guys. Benson, Zambrano, Trachsel, and Glavine have been average at best the last few seasons.
Glavine also tails off big time in the second half.
Yeah, Glavine's no longer a good-great pitcher. He is very hittable.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:04 PM
Post #63
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:00 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 05:42 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 04:39 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 03:56 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:54 PM
- Drew the Jew
- Jan 9 2005, 03:51 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:50 PM
I still say he asks out after 2 years. :evilgrin:
This reads like the A-Rod-Texas situation. With all due respect to the Muets, all things being equal Beltran would never go there. He's forcing himself to go there for the money.
ok sure he is BC, this isn't f*cking texas ok, the mets actually have pitching and they actually have a chance to win now so f*ck you!!!
If you seriously believe that, no offense, but you'd be a f*cking moron.
pitching wins AZZHOLE, the mets have one of the best pitching rotations in the league, the rangers never had any pitching while gayrod was with them, that's just the facts jack!!!
Don't make the Mets sound like they have a playoff caliber staff. They have Pedro and then decent guys. Benson, Zambrano, Trachsel, and Glavine have been average at best the last few seasons.
i'm just saying that they have a damn good rotation and they are nothing like the f*cking rangers!!!
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:05 PM
Post #64
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:04 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:00 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 05:42 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 04:39 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 03:56 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:54 PM
- Drew the Jew
- Jan 9 2005, 03:51 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:50 PM
I still say he asks out after 2 years. :evilgrin:
This reads like the A-Rod-Texas situation. With all due respect to the Muets, all things being equal Beltran would never go there. He's forcing himself to go there for the money.
ok sure he is BC, this isn't f*cking texas ok, the mets actually have pitching and they actually have a chance to win now so f*ck you!!!
If you seriously believe that, no offense, but you'd be a f*cking moron.
pitching wins AZZHOLE, the mets have one of the best pitching rotations in the league, the rangers never had any pitching while gayrod was with them, that's just the facts jack!!!
Don't make the Mets sound like they have a playoff caliber staff. They have Pedro and then decent guys. Benson, Zambrano, Trachsel, and Glavine have been average at best the last few seasons.
i'm just saying that they have a damn good rotation and they are nothing like the f*cking rangers!!!
It's not damn good. It's slightly above average and that's only because of Pedro and the fact that other teams have garbage. You have a 1 great and 4 decent pitching staff.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:08 PM
Post #65
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:05 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:04 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:00 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 05:42 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 04:39 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 03:56 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:54 PM
- Drew the Jew
- Jan 9 2005, 03:51 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:50 PM
I still say he asks out after 2 years. :evilgrin:
This reads like the A-Rod-Texas situation. With all due respect to the Muets, all things being equal Beltran would never go there. He's forcing himself to go there for the money.
ok sure he is BC, this isn't f*cking texas ok, the mets actually have pitching and they actually have a chance to win now so f*ck you!!!
If you seriously believe that, no offense, but you'd be a f*cking moron.
pitching wins AZZHOLE, the mets have one of the best pitching rotations in the league, the rangers never had any pitching while gayrod was with them, that's just the facts jack!!!
Don't make the Mets sound like they have a playoff caliber staff. They have Pedro and then decent guys. Benson, Zambrano, Trachsel, and Glavine have been average at best the last few seasons.
i'm just saying that they have a damn good rotation and they are nothing like the f*cking rangers!!!
It's not damn good. It's slightly above average and that's only because of Pedro and the fact that other teams have garbage. You have a 1 great and 4 decent pitching staff.
no your wrong, the mets have one of the best rotations in the league, pedro is still a top 10 pitcher, glavine had a 3.60ERA last season, benson has tons a potential and showed it late last season, zambrano (BC's favorite) is unhittable when his walks are down and trachsel is a steady pitcher that has put together 4 good years in a row so stop with the bullsh*t, THE METS HAVE A DAMN GOOD ROTATION!!!
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:11 PM
Post #66
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:08 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:05 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:04 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:00 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 05:42 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 04:39 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 03:56 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:54 PM
- Drew the Jew
- Jan 9 2005, 03:51 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:50 PM
I still say he asks out after 2 years. :evilgrin:
This reads like the A-Rod-Texas situation. With all due respect to the Muets, all things being equal Beltran would never go there. He's forcing himself to go there for the money.
ok sure he is BC, this isn't f*cking texas ok, the mets actually have pitching and they actually have a chance to win now so f*ck you!!!
If you seriously believe that, no offense, but you'd be a f*cking moron.
pitching wins AZZHOLE, the mets have one of the best pitching rotations in the league, the rangers never had any pitching while gayrod was with them, that's just the facts jack!!!
Don't make the Mets sound like they have a playoff caliber staff. They have Pedro and then decent guys. Benson, Zambrano, Trachsel, and Glavine have been average at best the last few seasons.
i'm just saying that they have a damn good rotation and they are nothing like the f*cking rangers!!!
It's not damn good. It's slightly above average and that's only because of Pedro and the fact that other teams have garbage. You have a 1 great and 4 decent pitching staff.
no your wrong, the mets have one of the best rotations in the league, pedro is still a top 10 pitcher, glavine had a 3.60ERA last season, benson has tons a potential and showed it late last season, zambrano (BC's favorite) is unhittable when his walks are down and trachsel is a steady pitcher that has put together 4 good years in a row so stop with the bullsh*t, THE METS HAVE A DAMN GOOD ROTATION!!!
What are you talking about? I never ripped on Pedro. I respect him more than most here. He's awesome. I'll always concede that. But how dare you try to pass Glavine off as having a good season. He had an unconscious first half and then totally fell apart to have that 3.60 ERA. That was NOT a good season. He's on the decline and I guarantee he ain't producing any half this year like he put up last first half. He's mediore. Benson is in his 30s and you're still talking about potential? Zambrano will NEVER get full control. He's already like 30. Trachsel is decent, no other word to describe him.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:16 PM
Post #67
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:11 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:08 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:05 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:04 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:00 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 05:42 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 04:39 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 03:56 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:54 PM
- Drew the Jew
- Jan 9 2005, 03:51 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:50 PM
I still say he asks out after 2 years. :evilgrin:
This reads like the A-Rod-Texas situation. With all due respect to the Muets, all things being equal Beltran would never go there. He's forcing himself to go there for the money.
ok sure he is BC, this isn't f*cking texas ok, the mets actually have pitching and they actually have a chance to win now so f*ck you!!!
If you seriously believe that, no offense, but you'd be a f*cking moron.
pitching wins AZZHOLE, the mets have one of the best pitching rotations in the league, the rangers never had any pitching while gayrod was with them, that's just the facts jack!!!
Don't make the Mets sound like they have a playoff caliber staff. They have Pedro and then decent guys. Benson, Zambrano, Trachsel, and Glavine have been average at best the last few seasons.
i'm just saying that they have a damn good rotation and they are nothing like the f*cking rangers!!!
It's not damn good. It's slightly above average and that's only because of Pedro and the fact that other teams have garbage. You have a 1 great and 4 decent pitching staff.
no your wrong, the mets have one of the best rotations in the league, pedro is still a top 10 pitcher, glavine had a 3.60ERA last season, benson has tons a potential and showed it late last season, zambrano (BC's favorite) is unhittable when his walks are down and trachsel is a steady pitcher that has put together 4 good years in a row so stop with the bullsh*t, THE METS HAVE A DAMN GOOD ROTATION!!!
What are you talking about? I never ripped on Pedro. I respect him more than most here. He's awesome. I'll always concede that. But how dare you try to pass Glavine off as having a good season. He had an unconscious first half and then totally fell apart to have that 3.60 ERA. That was NOT a good season. He's on the decline and I guarantee he ain't producing any half this year like he put up last first half. He's mediore. Benson is in his 30s and you're still talking about potential? Zambrano will NEVER get full control. He's already like 30. Trachsel is decent, no other word to describe him.
no rotation has f*cking 5 aces in it, every rotation isn't going to have 5 pitchers that are great and have no problems, pedro is the ace, glavine is the #2 which he can be, you don't know what he's going to do next season! yes benson still has some potential, zambrano is an effective pitcher, he was the ace of the drays the last 2 seasons and trachsel is trachsel! you also seem to forget one thing, the peterson factor, besides mazzone he is the best pitching in baseball, he turns pitchers with questions marks into great pitchers so please you are the only one that thinks the mets don't have a top 5 rotation, oh yeah and EAT ME AZZHOLE!!!
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:18 PM
Post #68
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:19 PM
Post #69
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:18 PM
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it
:-|
i bet you the only guy that has an ERA over 4.00 is trachsel!!!
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:20 PM
Post #70
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:16 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:11 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:08 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:05 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:04 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:00 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 05:42 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 04:39 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 03:56 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:54 PM
- Drew the Jew
- Jan 9 2005, 03:51 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:50 PM
I still say he asks out after 2 years. :evilgrin:
This reads like the A-Rod-Texas situation. With all due respect to the Muets, all things being equal Beltran would never go there. He's forcing himself to go there for the money.
ok sure he is BC, this isn't f*cking texas ok, the mets actually have pitching and they actually have a chance to win now so f*ck you!!!
If you seriously believe that, no offense, but you'd be a f*cking moron.
pitching wins AZZHOLE, the mets have one of the best pitching rotations in the league, the rangers never had any pitching while gayrod was with them, that's just the facts jack!!!
Don't make the Mets sound like they have a playoff caliber staff. They have Pedro and then decent guys. Benson, Zambrano, Trachsel, and Glavine have been average at best the last few seasons.
i'm just saying that they have a damn good rotation and they are nothing like the f*cking rangers!!!
It's not damn good. It's slightly above average and that's only because of Pedro and the fact that other teams have garbage. You have a 1 great and 4 decent pitching staff.
no your wrong, the mets have one of the best rotations in the league, pedro is still a top 10 pitcher, glavine had a 3.60ERA last season, benson has tons a potential and showed it late last season, zambrano (BC's favorite) is unhittable when his walks are down and trachsel is a steady pitcher that has put together 4 good years in a row so stop with the bullsh*t, THE METS HAVE A DAMN GOOD ROTATION!!!
What are you talking about? I never ripped on Pedro. I respect him more than most here. He's awesome. I'll always concede that. But how dare you try to pass Glavine off as having a good season. He had an unconscious first half and then totally fell apart to have that 3.60 ERA. That was NOT a good season. He's on the decline and I guarantee he ain't producing any half this year like he put up last first half. He's mediore. Benson is in his 30s and you're still talking about potential? Zambrano will NEVER get full control. He's already like 30. Trachsel is decent, no other word to describe him.
no rotation has f*cking 5 aces in it, every rotation isn't going to have 5 pitchers that are great and have no problems, pedro is the ace, glavine is the #2 which he can be, you don't know what he's going to do next season! yes benson still has some potential, zambrano is an effective pitcher, he was the ace of the drays the last 2 seasons and trachsel is trachsel! you also seem to forget one thing, the peterson factor, besides mazzone he is the best pitching in baseball, he turns pitchers with questions marks into great pitchers so please you are the only one that thinks the mets don't have a top 5 rotation, oh yeah and EAT ME AZZHOLE!!!
Yeah, Peterson really kept Glavine on the right track in the second half last year(5.06 ERA). Saying that Zambrano was the DRays ace is about as credible as being the world's tallest midget.
Please, just don't use the term damn good when you have decent pitchers. Damn good implies you have more than one great pitcher, at the least. You only Paydro
|
|
|
| |
|
Venom
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:21 PM
Post #71
|
May the Force be with you
- Posts:
- 36,293
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:18 PM
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it
That's 61-52! That's only 113 decisions.
Where the hell are the other 50 going to come from!? :????:
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:21 PM
Post #72
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:19 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:18 PM
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it :-| i bet you the only guy that has an ERA over 4.00 is trachsel!!!
He was 3-7 with a 4.80 LAST SECOND HALF!!!!! Where was the Peterson factor?!?!? Predicting him with a 4.00 and over ERA isn't farfetched at all.
|
|
|
| |
|
Yanks212
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:22 PM
Post #73
|
- Posts:
- 1,523
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #254
- Joined:
- November 5, 2004
|
- Rob :-|
- Jan 9 2005, 06:21 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:18 PM
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it
That's 61-52! That's only 113 decisions. Where the hell are the other 50 going to come from!? :????:
Heredia :smirk:
|
|
|
| |
|
Venom
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:24 PM
Post #74
|
May the Force be with you
- Posts:
- 36,293
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- Yanks212
- Jan 9 2005, 06:22 PM
- Rob :-|
- Jan 9 2005, 06:21 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:18 PM
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it
That's 61-52! That's only 113 decisions. Where the hell are the other 50 going to come from!? :????:
Heredia :smirk:
:devil:
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:24 PM
Post #75
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
- Rob :-|
- Jan 9 2005, 06:21 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:18 PM
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it
That's 61-52! That's only 113 decisions. Where the hell are the other 50 going to come from!? :????:
You'll obviously have injuries and spot starts, I assume Heilman will be used a bit. Plus, relief pitchers get their share of decisions on teams with mediocre staffs. What do you want me to do? Calculate 140 decisions? Ok
Pedro 18-9 2.89 27 decisions Glavine 13-15 55 decisions Benson 15-16 84 decisions
Ah f*ck it, I can't calculate exact wins and losses.
|
|
|
| |
|
Venom
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:25 PM
Post #76
|
May the Force be with you
- Posts:
- 36,293
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:24 PM
- Rob :-|
- Jan 9 2005, 06:21 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:18 PM
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it
That's 61-52! That's only 113 decisions. Where the hell are the other 50 going to come from!? :????:
You'll obviously have injuries and spot starts, I assume Heilman will be used a bit. Plus, relief pitchers get their share of decisions on teams with mediocre staffs. What do you want me to do? Calculate 140 decisions? Ok Pedro 18-9 2.89 27 decisions Glavine 13-15 55 decisions Benson 15-16 84 decisions Ah f*ck it, I can't calculate exact wins and losses.
Leaving 50 decisions for the bullpen and spot starts is an awful lot! :no:
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:26 PM
Post #77
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
Ok, Aaron Heilman 0-50 11.95 ERA
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:28 PM
Post #78
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:20 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:16 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:11 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:08 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:05 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:04 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:00 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 05:42 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 04:39 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 03:56 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:54 PM
- Drew the Jew
- Jan 9 2005, 03:51 PM
- Yanks473
- Jan 9 2005, 03:50 PM
I still say he asks out after 2 years. :evilgrin:
This reads like the A-Rod-Texas situation. With all due respect to the Muets, all things being equal Beltran would never go there. He's forcing himself to go there for the money.
ok sure he is BC, this isn't f*cking texas ok, the mets actually have pitching and they actually have a chance to win now so f*ck you!!!
If you seriously believe that, no offense, but you'd be a f*cking moron.
pitching wins AZZHOLE, the mets have one of the best pitching rotations in the league, the rangers never had any pitching while gayrod was with them, that's just the facts jack!!!
Don't make the Mets sound like they have a playoff caliber staff. They have Pedro and then decent guys. Benson, Zambrano, Trachsel, and Glavine have been average at best the last few seasons.
i'm just saying that they have a damn good rotation and they are nothing like the f*cking rangers!!!
It's not damn good. It's slightly above average and that's only because of Pedro and the fact that other teams have garbage. You have a 1 great and 4 decent pitching staff.
no your wrong, the mets have one of the best rotations in the league, pedro is still a top 10 pitcher, glavine had a 3.60ERA last season, benson has tons a potential and showed it late last season, zambrano (BC's favorite) is unhittable when his walks are down and trachsel is a steady pitcher that has put together 4 good years in a row so stop with the bullsh*t, THE METS HAVE A DAMN GOOD ROTATION!!!
What are you talking about? I never ripped on Pedro. I respect him more than most here. He's awesome. I'll always concede that. But how dare you try to pass Glavine off as having a good season. He had an unconscious first half and then totally fell apart to have that 3.60 ERA. That was NOT a good season. He's on the decline and I guarantee he ain't producing any half this year like he put up last first half. He's mediore. Benson is in his 30s and you're still talking about potential? Zambrano will NEVER get full control. He's already like 30. Trachsel is decent, no other word to describe him.
no rotation has f*cking 5 aces in it, every rotation isn't going to have 5 pitchers that are great and have no problems, pedro is the ace, glavine is the #2 which he can be, you don't know what he's going to do next season! yes benson still has some potential, zambrano is an effective pitcher, he was the ace of the drays the last 2 seasons and trachsel is trachsel! you also seem to forget one thing, the peterson factor, besides mazzone he is the best pitching in baseball, he turns pitchers with questions marks into great pitchers so please you are the only one that thinks the mets don't have a top 5 rotation, oh yeah and EAT ME AZZHOLE!!!
Yeah, Peterson really kept Glavine on the right track in the second half last year(5.06 ERA). Saying that Zambrano was the DRays ace is about as credible as being the world's tallest midget. Please, just don't use the term damn good when you have decent pitchers. Damn good implies you have more than one great pitcher, at the least. You only Paydro
NO TEAMS HAS 5 GREAT PITCHERS and read my f*cking post, i said peterson helps pitchers with "question marks", glavine has been a front of the rotation pitcher for over 10 years so he really can't help a guy like him! anyway i'll leave you with this, pedro is a #1, glavine is a #2, benson is a #3, zambrano is a #4 and trachsel is a #5, the rotation is in place, all those guys are right where they are suppose to be, besides the yankees, cubs and maybe astros no team has a better rotation then the mets do!!!
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:29 PM
Post #79
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:26 PM
Ok, Aaron Heilman 0-50 11.95 ERA
silliness, you don't know what the f*ck you are talking about!!!
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:33 PM
Post #80
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
I'll take the Yankees(RJ-Pavano-Moose-Wright-Brown), Red Sox(Clement-Miller-Schilling-Wakefield-Arroyo), Twins(Santana-Radke-the rest), Angels (Escobar-Colon-Byrd-Lackey), Marlins(Burnett-Beckett-the rest), Braves(Smoltz-Hudson-Hampton-Thompson-Ramirez), Cubs(Prior-Zambrano-Wood-Rusch-Maddux), etc. That's just to name a few off the top of my head. Having Pedro doesn't make up for having mediocrity everywhere else.
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:34 PM
Post #81
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:29 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:26 PM
Ok, Aaron Heilman 0-50 11.95 ERA
silliness, you don't know what the f*ck you are talking about!!!
It's called a joke. I dunno how the f*ck you couldn't understand that.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:40 PM
Post #82
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:33 PM
I'll take the Yankees(RJ-Pavano-Moose-Wright-Brown), Red Sox(Clement-Miller-Schilling-Wakefield-Arroyo), Twins(Santana-Radke-the rest), Angels (Escobar-Colon-Byrd-Lackey), Marlins(Burnett-Beckett-the rest), Braves(Smoltz-Hudson-Hampton-Thompson-Ramirez), Cubs(Prior-Zambrano-Wood-Rusch-Maddux), etc. That's just to name a few off the top of my head. Having Pedro doesn't make up for having mediocrity everywhere else.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
the angels, the twins, the marlins, the red sox, man i had a good laugh with that one, come on name teams with 5 good starters not with one or 2 ok, LFW i think that post was the real joke, man that's funny!!! :laugh2:
|
|
|
| |
|
Venom
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:40 PM
Post #83
|
May the Force be with you
- Posts:
- 36,293
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:26 PM
Ok, Aaron Heilman 0-50 11.95 ERA
Posted Image
|
|
|
| |
|
amit
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:50 PM
Post #84
|
Lizard King
- Posts:
- 12,959
- Group:
- Administrator
- Member
- #3
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Jan 10 2005, 01:19 AM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:18 PM
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it :-| i bet you the only guy that has an ERA over 4.00 is trachsel!!!
Posted Image
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:51 PM
Post #85
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- amit
- Jan 9 2005, 06:50 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 10 2005, 01:19 AM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:18 PM
Pedro 17-6 2.89 ERA Glavine 13-11 4.12 ERA Benson 12-14 4.45 ERA Zambrano 10-9 3.86 ERA Trachsel 9-12 4.45 ERA
Bank on it :-| i bet you the only guy that has an ERA over 4.00 is trachsel!!! Posted Image
nobosy uses that pic on me, NOBODY!!! :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious:
|
|
|
| |
|
amit
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:52 PM
Post #86
|
Lizard King
- Posts:
- 12,959
- Group:
- Administrator
- Member
- #3
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
:smirk:
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 07:53 PM
Post #87
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- amit
- Jan 9 2005, 06:52 PM
:fyou1:
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 08:55 PM
Post #88
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:40 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:33 PM
I'll take the Yankees(RJ-Pavano-Moose-Wright-Brown), Red Sox(Clement-Miller-Schilling-Wakefield-Arroyo), Twins(Santana-Radke-the rest), Angels (Escobar-Colon-Byrd-Lackey), Marlins(Burnett-Beckett-the rest), Braves(Smoltz-Hudson-Hampton-Thompson-Ramirez), Cubs(Prior-Zambrano-Wood-Rusch-Maddux), etc. That's just to name a few off the top of my head. Having Pedro doesn't make up for having mediocrity everywhere else. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: the angels, the twins, the marlins, the red sox, man i had a good laugh with that one, come on name teams with 5 good starters not with one or 2 ok, LFW i think that post was the real joke, man that's funny!!! :laugh2:
The Mets only have 1 really good starter. That's why I'd take any of those teams rotaitons, because at the very least, they have 2 very good starters.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheOne
|
Jan 9 2005, 08:57 PM
Post #89
|
I'm still better than you!
- Posts:
- 42,180
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #8
- Joined:
- January 29, 2004
|
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 07:55 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:40 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:33 PM
I'll take the Yankees(RJ-Pavano-Moose-Wright-Brown), Red Sox(Clement-Miller-Schilling-Wakefield-Arroyo), Twins(Santana-Radke-the rest), Angels (Escobar-Colon-Byrd-Lackey), Marlins(Burnett-Beckett-the rest), Braves(Smoltz-Hudson-Hampton-Thompson-Ramirez), Cubs(Prior-Zambrano-Wood-Rusch-Maddux), etc. That's just to name a few off the top of my head. Having Pedro doesn't make up for having mediocrity everywhere else. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: the angels, the twins, the marlins, the red sox, man i had a good laugh with that one, come on name teams with 5 good starters not with one or 2 ok, LFW i think that post was the real joke, man that's funny!!! :laugh2:
The Mets only have 1 really good starter. That's why I'd take any of those teams rotaitons, because at the very least, they have 2 very good starters.
yeah well the mets have 5 good pitchers, that's what makes their rotation a good one!!! :peace:
|
|
|
| |
YankeeGiantAQPHB
|
Jan 9 2005, 08:58 PM
Post #90
|
Dude, you're so banned
- Posts:
- 2,795
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #136
- Joined:
- May 30, 2004
|
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 07:57 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 07:55 PM
- TheOne
- Jan 9 2005, 06:40 PM
- YankeeGiantAQPHB
- Jan 9 2005, 06:33 PM
I'll take the Yankees(RJ-Pavano-Moose-Wright-Brown), Red Sox(Clement-Miller-Schilling-Wakefield-Arroyo), Twins(Santana-Radke-the rest), Angels (Escobar-Colon-Byrd-Lackey), Marlins(Burnett-Beckett-the rest), Braves(Smoltz-Hudson-Hampton-Thompson-Ramirez), Cubs(Prior-Zambrano-Wood-Rusch-Maddux), etc. That's just to name a few off the top of my head. Having Pedro doesn't make up for having mediocrity everywhere else. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: the angels, the twins, the marlins, the red sox, man i had a good laugh with that one, come on name teams with 5 good starters not with one or 2 ok, LFW i think that post was the real joke, man that's funny!!! :laugh2:
The Mets only have 1 really good starter. That's why I'd take any of those teams rotaitons, because at the very least, they have 2 very good starters.
yeah well the mets have 5 good pitchers, that's what makes their rotation a good one!!! :peace:
No, it doesn't. You're acting like you have a well-rounded five, instead of an ace and four mediocre pitchers.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|