| Welcome to Philippines Defense Forces Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| China demands war - Sino- Filipino Vietmamese WAR?; China said "The Dragon’s Teaching" | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 29 2011, 02:25 PM (7,903 Views) | |
| tendatu | Sep 30 2011, 08:17 PM Post #51 |
Member
  ![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)
|
So sir what could be the name of the Treaty Organization? |
| “Wars may be fought with weapons, but they are won by men. It is the spirit of the men who follow and of the man who leads that gains the victory.” | |
 |
 
|
| ni84 | Sep 30 2011, 08:28 PM Post #52 |
 
|
Forming a military alliance is a must but we must not depend too much on alliances on paper, knowing that all nations that would be members of this new SEATO have huge economic ties to China, thus all nations involve would lose something in the long run. |
|
We shall not fail or falter; we shall not weaken or tire...Give us the tools and we will finish the job. Sir Winston Churchill, BBC radio broadcast, 1941 We'll settle this the old navy way: first guy to die, loses. President Thomas 'Tug' Benson, Hot Shots! Part Deux  Raketnye voyska strategicheskogo naznacheniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 15,000 nukes and enough for another 40,000 | |
|
|
|
| spearhead | Sep 30 2011, 08:38 PM Post #53 |
DoctorNO, Your Neutral Observer.
|
Asian Treaty Organization. 
|
"Men of War must learn the art of numbers or he will not know how to array his troops." - Plato  
| |
|
|
|
| spearhead | Sep 30 2011, 08:41 PM Post #54 |
|
DoctorNO, Your Neutral Observer.
|
Hwag na natin isama yung ibang hesitant southeast asian nations like indonesia, malaysia, thailand, and brunei. I think singapore should join, they could help us bank-roll any military operations just in case. Its gonna be china's loss still. Panako lang yang alliance laban sa china. But they have a legitimate cause against global terrorrism, and when it comes to this term, indonesia and thailand should join.
|
|
"Men of War must learn the art of numbers or he will not know how to array his troops." - Plato
| |
|
|
|
| ni84 | Sep 30 2011, 08:48 PM Post #55 |
|
If it was up to me we should start laying the frame work for a potential war in the WPS. Start building command and control centers in underground and hardened facility, set up maritime and aerial surveillance network, establish a intelligence network that would monitor China's military development, form a threat assessment board. Establish "Fire Chain" namely SAM and Anti-ship missiles placement. |
|
We shall not fail or falter; we shall not weaken or tire...Give us the tools and we will finish the job. Sir Winston Churchill, BBC radio broadcast, 1941 We'll settle this the old navy way: first guy to die, loses. President Thomas 'Tug' Benson, Hot Shots! Part Deux Raketnye voyska strategicheskogo naznacheniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 15,000 nukes and enough for another 40,000 | |
|
|
|
| AVBsupersonic | Oct 1 2011, 04:04 AM Post #56 |
Member
|
With tensions building up with US and Pakistan, Maybe someones making sure that US will be too occupied to meddle in the South China Sea dispute and let's not forget N.Korea can easily join in and that would be a handful for US to handle... We must prepare for anything that can happen and not to take these threats lightly, nobody wants WAR, but we must not rely on US too much and we should have a PLAN B, C, D and acquire from other sources ASAP like Europe, India, SoKors, Japan, Israel for MRFs, Missile defense systems, Missile Warships, weapons etc. "Nasa Diyos ang Awa, Pero nasa Tao ang Gawa!" |
| "Some are just lucky that they're not under oath and are not classified!"- Blue badge | |
|
|
|
| ni84 | Oct 1 2011, 07:21 AM Post #57 |
|
I want to get that air-launch variant of the BrahMos that India and Russia is developing, which is slated to be used by the Su-34 or Su-30 variants. |
|
We shall not fail or falter; we shall not weaken or tire...Give us the tools and we will finish the job. Sir Winston Churchill, BBC radio broadcast, 1941 We'll settle this the old navy way: first guy to die, loses. President Thomas 'Tug' Benson, Hot Shots! Part Deux Raketnye voyska strategicheskogo naznacheniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 15,000 nukes and enough for another 40,000 | |
|
|
|
| spearhead | Oct 1 2011, 08:43 AM Post #58 |
|
DoctorNO, Your Neutral Observer.
|
This can't be right. Because The Book of Revelation said, there will be a 100,000 army marching from the east preparing for the final battle against the Beast's army. I thought they supposed to be filipinos! Well according to Manalo!  Now it seems like china is about to cripple the other claimants in WPS. Oooops... Maybe some other time.  Or maybe, china will be crippled and the filipinos with other allies will be victorious! |
|
"Men of War must learn the art of numbers or he will not know how to array his troops." - Plato
| |
|
|
|
| arnie | Oct 1 2011, 01:46 PM Post #59 |
|
Member
|
could be SOC (Sick Of China) against their SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization)
|
|
|
|
| Mckoyzzz | Oct 1 2011, 04:45 PM Post #60 |
Ipsa Scientia Potestas Est
|
BELOW IS AN INTERESTING RESPONSE FROM THE ARTICLE OF THE DIPLOMAT TITLED "TIME FOR CHINA TO STRIKE BACK". Here's is the link of the said article: http://the-diplomat.com/china-power/2011/0...to-strike-back/ (Facts and Fallacy) The title of The Diplomat post should be “Time for China to strike FIRST”. It is interesting to note that the Global Times presents the anonymous author as a strategic analyst of China Energy Fund Committee. So here is a specialist in Energy writing an article filled with military strategies (“think ahead and strike first”, “good preparations for a small-scale battle”, arms race, US plagued by war in the Middle-East would not intervene, ect…). Concerning the subject of Energy, his article is full of skilful fallacies, such as stating that out of the 1000 oil rigs in the SCS, none of them is BUILT by China. Who cares who built the rig? There are about 100 oil rigs exploited by China in the SCS. Vietnam and Philippines combined have less than 50. The rest belong to Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei. But, let’s punish Vietnam and Philippines first! Here are some additional facts and fallacies: FALLACY: SCS is “2nd Persian Gulf” in terms of Oil & Gas reserve (Chinese source) FACTS: -SCS has approximately 2% of proven World reserve (2008). -current oil production: World total 85 Mbbl/day, SCS total about 2.4 Mbbl/day, combined Vietnam’s and Philippines’ production is 0.310 Mbbl/day. For another perspective, China consumption is 9 Mbbl/day. -Sea lane importance: 1/3 World trade and 1/2 World oil & gas tonnage pass through it. 90% of Japan’s supply goes through it. -Local population of 300 Millions depends on Fish and marine products from it. In addition the SCS will likely be the sea with highest concentrations of submarines, the majority of them from Sania base. Oil and Gas as the smokescreen reason for preemptive war sounds very much like the “self-defence” pretext for the Sino-Vietnamese border war in 1979. So yes, the Global Times title (“Time to teach those countries around the SCS a lesson”) did not hide the author’s identity: Deng Xiaoping reincarnated as a military strategist. |
 "Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong -- Dandemis" | |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Military and Law Enforcement · Next Topic » |
2:50 PM Jul 13