| Welcome to Philippines Defense Forces Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The Kalayaan, Panatag & other disputed islands; Future conflict zones? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 2 2005, 08:00 PM (156,047 Views) | |
| AVBsupersonic | Jun 19 2011, 05:00 PM Post #771 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Looks like similar to PARACEL's "Woody Island" controlled by PLA.... ![]() The Government should build PAF base in PALAWAN area something like this... |
| "Some are just lucky that they're not under oath and are not classified!"- Blue badge | |
![]() |
|
| AWOL Geek | Jun 19 2011, 05:17 PM Post #772 |
|
Trainee
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You're obviously a poser, a real intel officer is calm, composed and collected, rarely shows emotions unlike you who is clearly very hysterical & aggressive. You are just fanning unnecessary hatred with your fiery & crazy rhetoric. You're a looney and doesn't deserve to be responded to from now on. |
|
The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu | |
![]() |
|
| AVBsupersonic | Jun 19 2011, 05:28 PM Post #773 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
@AWOL,
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO DESERVES THIS TREATMENT! I'M CALLING ALL PDFF MEMBERS TO AVOID AND NEVER AGAIN TO RESPOND AND GIVE IN TO THIS LOONEY'S BEHAVIOUR, THIS GUY IS NOT WORTH IT AND IS MAYBE USING THIS SITE TO SAVE HIS FACE AND WHATEVER NATION HE REPRESENTS FROM HUMILIATION, CLEARLY A LOOSER!!! ADIOS LOOSER! |
| "Some are just lucky that they're not under oath and are not classified!"- Blue badge | |
![]() |
|
| AWOL Geek | Jun 19 2011, 05:34 PM Post #774 |
|
Trainee
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In discussion forums like PDFF, the first person who loses his cool is the loser.
|
|
The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu | |
![]() |
|
| Samir_Duran | Jun 19 2011, 05:34 PM Post #775 |
|
THE GHOST
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
:whogives: AVB: Thanks! |
![]() |
|
| Samir_Duran | Jun 19 2011, 09:15 PM Post #776 |
|
THE GHOST
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
AVB was right. It is the Paracel. Check this out: http://vm.nthu.edu.tw/southsea/english.west.htm |
![]() |
|
| israeli | Jun 19 2011, 10:44 PM Post #777 |
![]()
|
Woody Island (Chinese name: Yongxing Dao), part of the Chinese-controlled Paracel Islands. That island is capable of hosting PLAAF fighter aircraft such as Su-30MKK Flankers. ----- UNCLOS allows passage of Chinese ship, but no markers — AFP GMANews.tv 06/19/2011 | 10:35 PM Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) spokesman Commodore Miguel Jose Rodriguez said on Sunday that the Philippine Navy will not intercept the Chinese patrol ship deployed to the West Philippine Sea last Wednesday, but it will not be allowed to place markers in the exclusive economic zone of the Philippines to comply with 1992 UN Convention on the Laws of the Sea (UNCLOS). More of the article here. |
| "To secure peace is to prepare for war." - Carl Von Clausewitz | |
![]() |
|
| victor | Jun 20 2011, 01:40 AM Post #778 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We need to get back Mischief Reef and Thomas Shoal at all cost! _____ AS I agree with you on the detailed picture of what the PLA motives( to encircle the northwest territories of KIG) , sadly WE cannot take back Panganiban reef West of Palawan by force or WE are at risk losing PAGASA islands or other northwest territories in KIG, the only logical reason why FVR ofted not to destroy those structures in 1995. WE lack surveillance assets during that time( only PN fishermen doing the eyes and ears in the area but lack modern and technical assets) and did nothing to counter the PLAN blitz in the West Philippine Sea. The best thing we did was the grounding of a landing craft in the other shoal kms away from Panganiban reef to monitor the movements of the chinese fishermen.I agree also with Rep. Golez wisdom that we cannot make another mistakes in the WPS by putting our guards down, we should enforce and do sovereign patrols in the vicinity of recto bank and iroquis (amy douglas) or the northwest part of our territory (in those areas including bajo de masinloc ) even a symbolic patrol of Rajah Humabon will do the thing or put up all the air and naval assets of Western command as well as the Coast Guard. |
| Address Spratly Island to KALAYAAN ISLANDS, South China Sea to WESTERN PHILIPPINE SEA or Kanlurang Dagat ng Pilipinas. | |
![]() |
|
| valiant | Jun 20 2011, 05:29 PM Post #779 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I suggest diplomacy in Spratlys issue. "Gentle hand may lead even an elephant by a single hair."- Iranian Proverb |
![]() |
|
| atreidesx69 | Jun 20 2011, 05:41 PM Post #780 |
|
Trainee
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
China is certainly using "diplomacy". Gunboat diplomacy that is. We have to accept the fact that China is eager to show that she's an emerging superpower both economically and militarily. We have to draw the line sometime and say enough is enough. |
![]() |
|
| 2 users reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · West Philippine Sea · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



Ive been a long time lurker here in PDFF and timawa.net and youve been exposed as a poser intel officer. This was probably one of your delusions LOL.


8:31 AM Jul 11