Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Philippines Defense Forces Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Shall we go Russian?
Topic Started: Aug 28 2004, 02:35 PM (13,392 Views)
adroth
Member
[ *  *  * ]
hurricane
Sep 18 2004, 11:52 AM
agree with tantalus...


You have to match your equipment acquisition with your objective. My take on the situation is that the Marines want to get as many troops on the beach in as short a time as possible.

The AAVP7 can carry 25 combat ready troops. The BMP can only carry 7. To satify the above objective you would need either 3.5 (make that 4) BMPs to accomplish what a single AAVP7 can do -- or have a single BMP make 4 trips, back and forth from the LST.

The first option will quadruple the initial BMP purchase cost; the latter will give the enemy more time to respond.

If we consider simple COIN scenarios, the PMC will need more BMPs to match the transport benefits of the AAVP -- again because the latter can move more people.

Quote:
 
if a vehicle can be >BOTH< and IFV and an FSV, is it waste of  resources? i think not...


If the overall strategy does not call for a one-size-fits all vehicle, then it is a waste of resources. Because the money spent on it could have been better spent on vehicles that support the chosen doctrine.

To make the most of your resouces, get something that will really do the job. The BMP is:

- Not much of a transport because it carries too few troops

- Not much of a defense against MBTs, because it's too lightly armored

So what objective will it really satisfy? The AAVP may be vulnerable, but at least is satisfies a specific need. Making it a good buy.

Quote:
 
the BMP-3F can protect itself better against MBTs and even helos  and can even swim with ERA added, its  extra firepower can provide support to infantry in real time..


The BMP 3 wouldn't stand a chance going head to head with an MBT. IFVs were never intended to do so. Their job is mainly to protect / transport the infantry that escort the MBTs.
Avatar c/o: http://www.proudlypinoy.org/

Defense of the Republic of the Philippines (DefensePH)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
al'Lan Mandragoran
Member Avatar
Member
[ *  *  * ]
BMP with ERA addons
Posted Image

* All-round protection against PG-9S grenades:
- with і 0.8 probability in the areas covered by ERA tiles;
- with і 0.5 probability in the areas covered by grill screens.
* No breach of the main armor when hit by AT grenades.
* Protection against AP bullets:
- 12.7mm B-32 AP bullets - point-blank;
- 14.5mm B-32 AP bullets - at 50m.
* Hull protection against 30mm AP ammunition at firing angles of ±30° at 0m.
* Reduction of irretrievable losses of vehicles by a factor of 5
* Increase of possibility of vehicle combat efficiency restoration by a factor of 8
* Reduction of irretrievable losses of the crew and troops by a factor of 12
* Total weight of the kit: 4,150 kg.

niistali.ru
"In wars, boy, fools kill other fools for foolish causes."

"Run when you have to, fight when you must, rest when you can."

- Robert Jordan; The Wheel of Time
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Seventeener
Unregistered
Guests

im impressed with that BMP :thumb:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
martilyo
Unregistered
Guests

ok naman siguro ang aftersales support ng mga russians, bumili na ng bmp 3 ang united arab emirates at south korea tapos susunod ang thailand...kaya suhestiyon ko lapit na tayo sa mga russians, wala tayong mapapala sa mga kano at kung meron man karamihan bulok ... :rifle:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
adroth
Member
[ *  *  * ]
martilyo
Sep 22 2004, 10:25 AM
ok naman siguro ang aftersales support ng mga russians, bumili na ng bmp 3 ang united arab emirates at south korea tapos susunod ang thailand...kaya suhestiyon ko lapit na tayo sa mga russians, wala tayong mapapala sa mga kano at kung meron man karamihan bulok ...  :rifle:

If we go head to head with the Chinese (currently main potential enemy), can we we still count on Russian support?

I'm not blind to the short comings of the US relationship . . . but we do have a mutual defense treaty with them, which is more that we can say for the Russians.
Avatar c/o: http://www.proudlypinoy.org/

Defense of the Republic of the Philippines (DefensePH)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KiloVictor
Unregistered
Guests

Quote:
 
If we go head to head with the Chinese (currently main potential enemy), can we we still count on Russian support?


I think so. The Russians aren't exactly politically chummy with the Chinese. Their current relationship is more business than ideology. It will not look good on the Russian arms industry if they withhold parts and ordnance support in the event of a conflict with China. Remember, China is not their only big-time customer, India (a known China rival) is a far more lucrative Russian arms buyer than China. Other countries too will think twice in buying more equipment from Russia if this embargo happens.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
al'Lan Mandragoran
Member Avatar
Member
[ *  *  * ]
Not only armored vehicles but transport trucks too. Kamaz trucks are cheap, yet quality alternatives to US-madetrucks.
Posted Image
"In wars, boy, fools kill other fools for foolish causes."

"Run when you have to, fight when you must, rest when you can."

- Robert Jordan; The Wheel of Time
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
adroth
Member
[ *  *  * ]
KiloVictor
Sep 23 2004, 11:25 AM
Quote:
 
If we go head to head with the Chinese (currently main potential enemy), can we we still count on Russian support?


I think so. The Russians aren't exactly politically chummy with the Chinese. Their current relationship is more business than ideology. It will not look good on the Russian arms industry if they withhold parts and ordnance support in the event of a conflict with China. Remember, China is not their only big-time customer, India (a known China rival) is a far more lucrative Russian arms buyer than China. Other countries too will think twice in buying more equipment from Russia if this embargo happens.

The Russians have a much closer relationship with the Chinese than they do with us. Practically every piece of Chinese equipment has Russian influences . . . even the Chinese space program benefits from Russian assistance. I seriously doubt if they could turn their backs on that so easily.
Avatar c/o: http://www.proudlypinoy.org/

Defense of the Republic of the Philippines (DefensePH)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Singa Lion
Member
[ *  *  * ]
i agree with adrott here..dont buy russian instead by singaporean, we have better quality vehicles and weapons... :armysmile:
Posted Image
The SAF is an armed force , not a civilian corporation. Its mission is to defeat its enemies, ruthlessly and completely. Its an instrument of controlled fury, designed to visit death and destruction of its foes...soldiers must have steel in their souls ..must learn in war to kill and not to flinch, to destroy and not to feel pity, to be a flaming sword in the righteous cause of national survival.
-BG Lee , 1984
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Numbers
PDFF Moderator
PDFF Mod Group
the Bionix then, its as versatile as the M113... it even has a bridge layer variant :drunk:

Bionix AVLB
One little two little three little four little...

Behind every successful man, there is a woman
And behind every unsuccessful man, there are two.

A bus station is where a bus stops.
A train station is where a train stops.
On my desk, I have a work station....
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Military and Law Enforcement · Next Topic »
Add Reply