| Welcome to Philippines Defense Forces Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| US & China Square Off Over South China Sea | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 12 2012, 01:32 PM (27,749 Views) | |
| Mckoyzzz | Apr 4 2014, 04:02 PM Post #71 |
|
Ipsa Scientia Potestas Est
![]()
|
US warns China not to attempt Crimea-style action in Asia April 4, 2014 8:47am WASHINGTON - China should not doubt the US commitment to defend its Asian allies and the prospect of economic retaliation should also discourage Beijing from using force to pursue territorial claims in Asia in the way Russia has in Crimea, a senior US official said on Thursday. Daniel Russel, President Barack Obama's diplomatic point man for East Asia, said it was difficult to determine what China's intentions might be, but Russia's annexation of Crimea had heightened concerns among US allies in the region about the possibility of China using force to pursue its claims. "The net effect is to put more pressure on China to demonstrate that it remains committed to the peaceful resolution of the problems," Russel, the US assistant secretary of state for East Asia, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Russel said the retaliatory sanctions imposed on Russia by the United States, the European Union and others should have a "chilling effect on anyone in China who might contemplate the Crimea annexation as a model." This was especially so given the extent of China's economic interdependence with the United States and its Asia neighbors, Russel said. Russel said that while the United States did not take a position on rival territorial claims in East Asia, China should be in no doubt about Washington's resolve to defend its allies if necessary. "The president of the United States and the Obama administration is firmly committed to honoring our defense commitments to our allies," he said. GMA |
![]() "Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong -- Dandemis" | |
![]() |
|
| Hong Nam | May 5 2014, 05:45 PM Post #72 |
|
Bought by China
![]()
|
Asia is showing us that islands are increasingly valuable and coveted as military assets. So, if old strategies and long-held habit, coupled with bureaucratic and political pressures, are actually biasing the U.S. against islands, the Pentagon must take steps to re-analyze the military value of islands and island basing - and then make darn sure that our assessments of island value are in-line with everybody else - because, in a growing number of places, those little pieces of coral or rock are "in demand" and considered to be well-worth fighting over. America's Perilous Habit of Undervaluing Islands As Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel heads off to Asia to urge resolution of some of Asia's island disputes, many Americans will continue to scratch their heads in wonder as to why several Asian countries are at loggerheads over some small, seemingly useless and unpopulated islands. We need to remember that, these days, islands are not just economic assets, valued solely for their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and under-seabed resources. Islands are military assets with strategic and tactical value. Some reasons why the U.S. has an anti-island bias: 1) Islands are administratively out of US favor. 2) Island bases offer few domestic political benefits. 3) Pentagon is primed for consolidation and minimization of the military's geographical footprint. 4) The Pentagon is biased towards mobile sensors/power projection assets. "America is eager to hold onto whatever shipbuilding/floating naval assets we can, and that makes the Pentagon predisposed to dismiss, say, the idea of, say, using Thitu/Pag-asa Island as a tiny forward-based aircraft carrier or listening post. We prefer sending in a SSN or dispatching a CVN - 4.5 acres of floating U.S. sovereignty. And we do this despite acknowledging the fact that, in isolated areas, persistent presence is important and shared bases, outside the public eye, have worked quite well." "Operations off, say, a rented 45-Hectare island in the South China Sea might offer some very interesting geopolitical and operational opportunities that wouldn't come from a brief DDG/LCS or CVN visit." "We forget that most other countries don't have our floating arsenal, and, as such, must think harder about exploiting geography - for them, it may be far more cost-effective to use geography to house a missile base, a listening post or air wing than to develop carrier battle groups, subs or survivable combatants." 5) Washington has forgotten terraforming works. 6) Pentagon management of militarily-valuable island bases is fragmented. 7) Island vulnerability is being debated. What does America's Anti-Island Bias Mean? Is America risking miscalculation by undervaluing the military value of islands? You bet. Primarily, the U.S. is at risk of underestimating the military value other countries put upon islands and island bases. We also risk discounting entire important regions. Indonesia, the Philippines and Japan are all archipelagos, and they're all on the front lines of the Pacific Pivot. We should be right there with them, putting our well-worn (and likely locally unsuitable) Pentagon-grown "anti-island" biases aside to better understand just how these countries are approaching the problem of defending their island territories. NextNavy |
![]() Constructions Mecaniques de Normandie - C Sword 90 | |
![]() |
|
| AZKALS | May 9 2014, 07:30 PM Post #73 |
![]()
|
USS Blue Ridge Encounters Chinese Ships Near Disputed Scarborough Shoal http://www.stripes.com/news/blue-ridge-encounters-chinese-ships-near-disputed-isle-1.282222 By Erik Slavin Stars and Stripes Published: May 9, 2014 YOKOSUKA NAVAL BASE, Japan — A USS Blue Ridge-embarked helicopter photographed two Chinese navy ships May 5 near the site of a heavily contested shoal that has sparked a months-long standoff between China and the Philippines in 2012.The Navys photo release of two Chinese Navy ships near Scarborough Shoal sparked some online news outlets to label the encounter a confrontation, which 7th Fleet officials disputed Friday.USS Blue Ridge, the Japan based 7th Fleets flagship, transited without incident near the two ships, Navy officials said.All parties acted professionally, said 7th Fleet spokesman Cmdr. William Marks, who is embarked aboard Blue Ridge. There wasn’t any communication [with the Chinese] due to both Blue Ridge and its helicopter being a safe distance away, Marks said.Hull numbers in the Navy photos indicate the Chinese ships were the destroyer Lanzhou and the frigate Hengshui.The visit near Scarborough was not a freedom of navigation operation, Marks said in response to a Stars and Stripes question. Edited by MSantor, May 9 2014, 09:02 PM.
|
|
| |
![]() |
|
| gammy322 | May 9 2014, 08:29 PM Post #74 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
China blames US for stoking tensions in S.China Sea By: Reuters May 9, 2014 6:23 PM BEIJING - China's foreign ministry blamed the United States on Friday for stoking tensions in the disputed South China Sea by encouraging countries to engage in dangerous behavior, following an uptick in tensions between China and both the Philippines and Vietnam. China this week accused Vietnam of intentionally colliding with its ships in the South China Sea after Vietnam asserted that Chinese vessels used water cannon and rammed eight of its vessels at the weekend near an oil rig. The United States has called China's deployment of the rig "provocative and unhelpful" to security in the region, urging restraint on all sides. Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying repeated that the waters the rig was operating in, around the Paracel Islands, were Chinese territory and that no other country had the right to interfere. http://www.interaksyon.com/article/86444/china-blames-us-for-stoking-tensions-in-s-china-sea |
![]() |
|
| AZKALS | May 11 2014, 04:11 PM Post #75 |
![]()
|
2 Warships from China Continues to Patrol Around Panatag Shoal ...![]() (Photo: US 7th Fleet Command) |
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Mckoyzzz | May 15 2014, 01:26 AM Post #76 |
|
Ipsa Scientia Potestas Est
![]()
|
US, China spar again on disputed waters Reuters Posted at 05/13/2014 WASHINGTON/BEIJING - China hit back at the United States over the disputed South China Sea on Tuesday, after US Secretary of State John Kerry said recent Chinese moves in the resource-rich waters were "provocative." <snipped> "He (Kerry) said China's introduction of an oil rig and numerous government vessels in waters disputed with Vietnam was provocative," U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said, referring to a telephone call between Kerry and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in which North Korea was also discussed. "He urged both sides to de-escalate tensions, ensure safe conduct by their vessels at sea, and resolve the dispute through peaceful means in accordance with international law." China's foreign ministry said there certainly had been provocative moves in the South China Sea, but that China was not the guilty party and repeated that it was the United States' fault for encouraging such behaviour. "We hope that the US side can carefully reflect - if they really hope for the Pacific Ocean to be peaceful, what kind of role do they actually want to play?" spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a daily news briefing. Hua said that Wang urged Kerry to "objectively and fairly" look at the South China Sea issue, and "act and speak cautiously". China says that the South China Sea issue should be resolved via direct talks between the parties concerned, and has bristled at what it sees as unwarranted US interference. China has also looked askance at the US "pivot" back to Asia, especially Washington's efforts to boost existing military links with Tokyo and Manila. In separate remarks to visiting Singapore Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam, Kerry said the United States was deeply concerned by China's "aggressive act". "We are particularly concerned - all nations that are engaged in navigation and traffic within the South China Sea, the East China Sea, are deeply concerned about this aggressive act," Kerry said in the Monday meeting. "We want to see a code of conduct created; we want to see this resolved peacefully through the Law of the Sea, through arbitration, through any other means, but not direct confrontation and aggressive action," Kerry added, according to a transcript of his comments released by the State Department. ABS-CBN |
![]() "Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong -- Dandemis" | |
![]() |
|
| Ayoshi | May 17 2014, 01:43 PM Post #77 |
![]()
|
US warns China its actions in sea disputes are straining relations (abs-cbnnews.com) 5/16/2014
|
![]() |
|
| PinoyAko | May 23 2014, 04:50 PM Post #78 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Locklear: 'Winner-take-all' tack won't solve Asia rows By: Agence France-Presse May 23, 2014 3:42 PM
|
![]() |
|
| Ayoshi | May 29 2014, 01:27 AM Post #79 |
![]()
|
Obama warns against 'aggression' in South China Sea [rappler.com] May 29, 2014
|
![]() |
|
| Hong Nam | May 29 2014, 10:41 PM Post #80 |
|
Bought by China
![]()
|
So, are they finally going to ratify the UNCLOS ? |
![]() Constructions Mecaniques de Normandie - C Sword 90 | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · West Philippine Sea · Next Topic » |












![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)

8:30 AM Jul 11