| Welcome to Philippines Defense Forces Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Chinese police plan to board vessels in disputed seas | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 29 2012, 06:22 PM (3,503 Views) | |
| AVBsupersonic | Dec 1 2012, 03:37 AM Post #21 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They have white washed, downplayed incidents like those Filipino fishermen ramming incidents and who knows how many more, were maybe not reported?? Filipino blood was spilled already, now where's the justice for them? Local Filipino fishermen losing and having no rights to fish in those areas where their ancestors use to fish decades ago, FREELY without any problems, HOW CAN YOU LET THESE PASS OR TURN A BLIND EYE? - AKALA KO SABI MO KAMI ANG BOSS MO??? BAKA SILA TALAGA? DAHIL WALANG PABOR SA FILIPINO AT PURO SA INTSIK LAHAT... So frustrating... Edited by AVBsupersonic, Dec 1 2012, 03:38 AM.
|
| "Some are just lucky that they're not under oath and are not classified!"- Blue badge | |
![]() |
|
| superman | Dec 1 2012, 08:01 AM Post #22 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If its true lets then wait a bit to confirm it, Let us see what US action on this they are affected too this is an open sea for everyone's passage, If China is really dead serious in flexing it's muscle and challenge the US then we better brace ourselves coz we will surely be hosting another bigtime war and we will be just watching it again and catching bullets and bombs dropping by coz we have no means to counter it. |
![]() |
|
| Samir_Duran | Dec 1 2012, 10:34 AM Post #23 |
|
THE GHOST
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2012/12/01/877645/us-questions-chinese-plans-disputed-seas |
![]() |
|
| Real Macoy | Dec 1 2012, 03:53 PM Post #24 |
|
Trainee
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It is true and was officially declared by Beijing, it's all over the internet, main webs etc. US State Department officials have meetings left and right to clarify, questions China's plans. "Why is it everytime something like this is happening to us, the Philippine Govt. looks as if "Dumb" and the last one to know or confirm, when they are the ones mainly involved on these issues?" |
![]() |
|
| Furbolling | Dec 1 2012, 10:36 PM Post #25 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
this only show who is the real Bully. let's see if they can board a US Carrier that always make way in West Philippine Sea |
|
"Brothers!! What we do in life, Echoes through Eternity" -Maximus | |
![]() |
|
| pachador | Dec 2 2012, 01:16 AM Post #26 |
![]()
|
the same countries, that resisted invaders in world war 2 will be the same ones, more or less, who can be expected to resist in the next world war. thailand has tendencies to be neutralist, yung kagamitan nila ay pang-display lang yan. as I have mentioned before, ASEAN is best left as a group for cultural and economic exchanges. its better to organize a new security grouping composed of willing members who are willing to fight and leave out those who would rather stand on the sidelines. |
![]() |
|
| AVBsupersonic | Dec 2 2012, 01:43 AM Post #27 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
^^ Yes I agree with you Bro, a NATO like organization for SE Asian Nations and other friendly Nations. Members like: "One for all, all for one!" -US -Japan -Australia -India -S. Korea -Philippines -Vietnam -Indonesia -Malaysia -Brunei -Myanmar -Thailand (?) SCumbodia-banned for life |
| "Some are just lucky that they're not under oath and are not classified!"- Blue badge | |
![]() |
|
| Jim | Dec 2 2012, 04:09 AM Post #28 |
|
Trainee
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
APTO (Asia Pacific Treaty Org)? PITO (Pacific & Indian Treaty Org)?
|
![]() |
|
| AVBsupersonic | Dec 2 2012, 05:40 AM Post #29 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
ONCE AGAIN, Let's revive SEATO (S.E Asia Treaty Org) against Communist China... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeast_Asia_Treaty_Organization Edited by AVBsupersonic, Dec 2 2012, 05:46 AM.
|
| "Some are just lucky that they're not under oath and are not classified!"- Blue badge | |
![]() |
|
| spearhead | Dec 2 2012, 05:47 AM Post #30 |
|
DoctorNO, Your Neutral Observer.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The way our ASEAN brothers behave, i doubt none of them are willing to join another SEATO type alliance, but if there is one, you know which country it is. I see only a handful asian countries who might be willing to join us in an alliance against china in case, the worst scenario happens. They are US, SK, Japan, Australia, India, the Philippines, and maybe Vietnam and Canada. It will be then a new group name. Canada is watching the disputes very closely, they are quietly showing off their military muscles together with the US during the recent RIMPAC. And a lot of canadian government officials are taking notice of this chinese expansion and influence in our politics and economy. We are very cautious here too, i read it somewhere.
Edited by spearhead, Dec 2 2012, 05:53 AM.
|
"Men of War must learn the art of numbers or he will not know how to array his troops." - Plato![]() ![]() | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · West Philippine Sea · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)






8:54 AM Jul 11