| Welcome to Philippines Defense Forces Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Wary US ‘conquers’ Asia-Pacific waters | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 12 2012, 03:21 PM (5,048 Views) | |
| Parastriker | Jun 7 2013, 05:24 PM Post #21 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Then why didn't we ask help directly from them? I repeat to say that U.S. will not defend our own country's territory for us; we need the initiative to either ask help from their government directly or defend it ourselves. |
|
Success through information, victory through disinformation. "Good leaders make efficient followers. Great leaders make good followers. But true leaders make leaders out of mere followers." "Measuring the intelligence of a common internet user is as easy as looking at his/her grammar." | |
![]() |
|
| Hong Nam | Jun 7 2013, 06:31 PM Post #22 |
|
Bought by China
![]()
|
That's a good answer mi hermano. For things to go your way - Kicking the Chinese out. The Philippines has to modernize and attain the so called "Minimum Credible Defense" fast. The alleged "lack of U.S. resolve" (which the Chinese thinks) could be a result of decades of conflict. But this may be reversed if the Philippines can convince the world that things have indeed changed. You have to show them that you are willing do your part and stand up against them. Do allow me to ask a few questions. I have noticed many defense forums lately and the activity has been picking up. My questions are... 1) Outside these forums, is the general populace aware of what is going on? 2) If they are, do they care? Have you asked the regular "Juan" on what their thoughts are on the situation? 3) Or are they just more concerned about what's going in show business with it's latest gossip and scandals? 4) Is there a general air of indifference? 5) Are the politicians still busy looking out for the old "numero uno" - themselves? Play smart and don't fall into the Chinese trap. Don't let them goad you into making mistakes. Use the media to expand your cause and expose the insidious PROC. You showed the world you could do it once - EDSA. I am sure you can do it again. Ever though of having one in Scarborough Shoal? It may be a gargantuan task but you have the advantage of distance. Should be worth a try. Imagine all the publicity you would gain worldwide. Edited by Hong Nam, Jun 7 2013, 06:32 PM.
|
![]() Constructions Mecaniques de Normandie - C Sword 90 | |
![]() |
|
| Parastriker | Jun 7 2013, 08:51 PM Post #23 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This might be well out-of-topic, but I would like to entertain some questions that I could at least answer; 1. Yes, the populace is aware of what is going on 2. And this is the problem. The people expected PNOY to make an overnight miracle and drive the Chinese away by his own will alone. The populace here might have made a difference if they had voted wisely. But they threw it away like mere trash because of the dazzling allure of TV Ads, (at this part pardon my speech) and allowing the likes of Nancy Binay to enter the halls of high governance. 3. Honest answer? Yes, they are more concerned in the allure of insignificant TV Ads. 4. A big yes. Actually, indifference is incorrect, the more proper term I think is fatalism. 5. Yes, they are. Just look at Villafuerte, Cataquiz, and many other politicians out there. Sorry for the interruption, now
|
|
Success through information, victory through disinformation. "Good leaders make efficient followers. Great leaders make good followers. But true leaders make leaders out of mere followers." "Measuring the intelligence of a common internet user is as easy as looking at his/her grammar." | |
![]() |
|
| Hong Nam | Jun 8 2013, 11:54 PM Post #24 |
|
Bought by China
![]()
|
US military commander, Phl execs tackle sea row By Jaime Laude (philstar.com) Updated June 7, 2013 - 5:30pm MANILA, Philippines - Top defense and military officials on Friday tackled behind closed door the mounting tension in the West Philippine Sea with US top military commander. “The Admiral discussed how the US could contribute in enhancing the capability of the AFP in meeting emerging security challenges to include maritime security,” defense spokesperson Anne Marie Sta. Ana said in a press statement. One of the emerging security challenges in the region is China’s deployment of its warships and surveillance vessels to press its maritime claim in the West Philippine Sea, particularly at Ayungin Shoal and Panganiban Reef, now China's naval outpost near Palawan. Since his assumption as USPACOM commander last year, almost the time when China started flexing its muscle in claiming almost 80 percent of the entire South China Sea, Locklear has been in the country thrice. http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2013/06/07/951301/us-military-commander-phl-execs-tackle-sea-row |
![]() Constructions Mecaniques de Normandie - C Sword 90 | |
![]() |
|
| Mckoyzzz | Jun 10 2013, 03:42 PM Post #25 |
|
Ipsa Scientia Potestas Est
![]()
|
China 'throwing down the hatchet' with U.S. Admiral: 'We're in another Cold War with another communist, totalitarian regime' June 7, 2013 China is claiming control over the vast majority of the South China Sea in its latest effort to challenge U.S. authority, and President Obama must make it clear that cannot happen, warns retired U.S. Navy Admiral James “Ace” Lyons. <snipped> “President Obama has to be very clear and let China know we will not tolerate their illegal claims to these vast ocean areas that have been recognized for centuries as international waters,” said Lyons, who argued that Obama has a golden opportunity to set things straight this week when he meets with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in California. “This will probably be one of the first issues discussed at the summit, and I’m sure that our allies will be watching carefully how President Obama handles this issue.” <snipped> "The United States Navy has stood for freedom of navigation and the right of innocent passage for over 236 years, and we’re certainly not going to change course now. And we’re certainly not going to back down on that recognized principle. China has to recognize they’ve benefited greatly from that principle,” Lyons said. <snipped> The admiral warned this move by the Chinese is a major step toward a larger, more disturbing goal: surpassing the United States on the high seas. “China has built a navy specifically to fight the United States Navy. You know, their anti-ship ballistic missile is not to go against the Bangladesh navy,” Lyons said. “We should consider that an unfriendly act. By their actions, they have thrown down the hatchet. They really are signaling to us that we are entering the 21st century where we’re in another Cold War with another communist, totalitarian regime,” he said. <snipped> So what would the best U.S. strategy be to make the Chinese reverse course? “First of all, we have to make clear to China that we will stand by our mutual defense treaty with our allies over this issue should hostilities develop,” said Lyons, who is very critical of what he sees as decreasing of our military might. <snipped> Lyons admits China holding a sizable chunk of America’s debt hurts U.S. efforts to demand policy changes, but he said it’s not as big of a factor as some suggest. “I think that works both ways. That’s one side of the equation, but we also have leverage on the other. I believe China needs us more than we need them,” he said. “They need this market here, and they can’t afford to lose it.” WND Edited by Mckoyzzz, Jun 10 2013, 03:44 PM.
|
![]() "Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong -- Dandemis" | |
![]() |
|
| fernandez705 | Jun 11 2013, 01:21 AM Post #26 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
anyone interested in a joint bilateral exercise for asean and also invite america, india, sokor, japan, russia, australia, britain in it. conduct amphibious exercises in host countries and naval drills in WPS. main purpose is to increases relation between all the nations and put aside difference in the disputed waters and end up helping each other in WPS. also to show presence against beijing that the one rope unite to many ropes which is harder to break.
Edited by fernandez705, Jun 11 2013, 01:22 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| pachador | Jun 11 2013, 11:52 AM Post #27 |
![]()
|
i still hope that the philippines is just waiting for the ruling from ITLOS so if SHTF(rammings escalating into firing) we have the legal mandate and the bully cannot claim self-defense(in firing) since they have no business being in panatag or ayungin assuming a favorable ITLOS ruling in our favor..... and by extension, it is much easier for allies, e.g. US / Japan to intervene and help us since we have the international legal mandate(ITLOS ruling in our favor). lastly ,its also easier and faster to call for a UN resolution condemning the bully. Edited by pachador, Jun 11 2013, 11:54 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · West Philippine Sea · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)








8:52 AM Jul 11