|Welcome to Philippines Defense Forces Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.|
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:
|US adding submarines, bombers & missile defense systems to Guam|
|Topic Started: Jul 28 2012, 07:36 PM (262 Views)|
|Duminus||Jul 28 2012, 07:36 PM Post #1|
PDFF Admin Support
2:00 PM, Jul. 28, 2012
A new study on military might in the Pacific mentions the possibility of even fewer Marines moving to Guam, but it also considers adding submarines, bombers and missile defense systems to the island.
The Center of Strategic and International Studies, a nonprofit organization, submitted its report to Congress last week, and a 109-page unclassified section of the report was made public yesterday.
The report gives an independent look at how military forces are organized throughout the Asia-Pacific region and gives recommendation on what changes could increase overall security. Members of the Senate required this report -- among others -- before they are willing to spend any money on the Marine move.
|saver111||Aug 2 2012, 04:34 PM Post #2|
US to mull more bombers, submarines for Pacific
JIM WOLF, Reuters August 2, 2012 11:05am
The new assessment of the US military force posture in the region was carried out by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, or CSIS, a nonpartisan policy research group, subsequent to a congressional mandate.
It recommended in a report made public last week stationing one or more additional attack submarines in Guam to provide what it called a critical edge against "anti-access, area denial" – technologies being developed by China to keep the US military at bay.
CSIS listed as another option permanently relocating a B-52 squadron of 12 aircraft to Guam, rather than the current practice of rotating in from bases in the continental United States.
The central geostrategic uncertainty that the United States and its allies and partners face in the region "is how China's growing power and influence will impact order and stability in the years ahead," the CSIS review said.
It said US forces can help shape the peacetime environment by standing behind US security commitments – a move the review said would "dissuade Chinese coercion or North Korean aggression."
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has announced plans to "rebalance" US naval forces from a nearly 50-50 split between the Atlantic and the Pacific to a 60-40 mix in favor of the Asia-Pacific. The details of this shift have not been spelled out, although officials have said much of the buildup will involve new ships.
Sher, in joint written testimony to the panel with David Helvey, an acting deputy assistant secretary of defense for the region, said the Defense Department agreed with the CSIS assessment that "there are opportunities to move forward with Guam and send an important signal to the region."
Neither additional bombers nor additional attack submarines are in current US plans for the region but will be considered based on CSIS's "good work," Scher told Reuters after the hearing.
David Berteau, director of the CSIS International Security Program and a co-director of the review, said Guam cold absorb additional submarines without a huge amount of extra military construction costs, for instance for pier space or shore facilities.
The Defense Department also will continue to explore opportunities with the Philippines, a treaty ally, of deploying forces to unspecified "priority areas" to enhance maritime security, the Defense Department officials testified. — Reuters
Justice for Daniel Lorenz Jacinto
HELP END PIRACY NOW!:
|saver111||Mar 19 2013, 08:53 PM Post #3|
US flies B-52 bombers over S. Korea
10:25 am | Tuesday, March 19th, 2013
Pentagon press secretary George Little AFP
SEOUL – The United States said it was flying training missions of nuclear-capable B-52 bombers over South Korea, in a clear signal to North Korea at a time of escalating military tensions.
The flights — part of annual joint South Korea-US military exercises — should be seen as underscoring US commitment and capacity to defend Seoul against an attack from the North, Pentagon spokesman George Little said.
In response to UN sanctions imposed after its third nuclear test last month, North Korea has warned of a “second Korean war” and threatened pre-emptive nuclear strikes on the South and the United States.
Little said a B-52 from Andersen Air Force base in Guam, flew over South Korea on March 8 as part of a military exercise dubbed “Foal Eagle.”
“The B-52 Stratofortress can perform a variety of missions including carrying precision-guided conventional or nuclear ordnance,” he said Monday.
“We’re drawing attention to the fact that we have extended deterrence capabilities that we believe are important to demonstrate in the wake of recent North Korean rhetoric,” he said.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced that 14 more interceptors would be stationed in Alaska, increasing by almost half the 30 already deployed along the California and Alaska coastlines.
Hagel said the defence upgrade was designed to “stay ahead of the threat” from North Korea, which is still believed to be years from having a missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead to the continental United States.
Ri also denounced what he termed a US policy of “nuclear blackmail” that he insisted would “in the long run give birth to more nuclear weapons states”.
Justice for Daniel Lorenz Jacinto
HELP END PIRACY NOW!:
|Parastriker||Mar 19 2013, 10:37 PM Post #4|
Those B-52s will remind those North Koreans what happened during the B-29 bomber campaign.
|Success through information, victory through disinformation.|
|1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)|
|« Previous Topic · US Military News & Issues · Next Topic »|