| Welcome to Chatterb0x - The Last Remaining Slammy Gang Forum **Please Register to join a vibrant, historic community!!** Join our community! Please read the Board Rules before registering: **Note: These are the current rules of the board but they are ALL open to discussion and possible amendments/repealments may take place through a period of debate followed by a simple majority vote.** 1. Absolutely zero tolerance on spamming and flooding. Users can be banned for life immediately for a single infraction. Flooding is defined as FOUR posts or more with the same or similar content within a period of TEN minutes or less or FOUR shouts or more with the same or similar content within a period of SEVEN minutes. 2. No overt hate speech/links to overt hate speech is allowed. Users can be banned for life immediately for a single infraction. 3. Flaming (i.e. insulting attacks on other members) is allowed ONLY in the FLAME WARS section. It will not be tolerated anywhere else on the board and any infractions can lead to a lifetime ban. 5. Any Member who creates a 'sockpuppet' account (i.e. a fake account) will be suspended for a period of no less than 90 days. 6. Any Member caught impersonating another member in the shoutbox will be suspended for at LEAST one week. Further infractions of this kind may lead to a lifetime ban. 7. Rules 1 and 2 also apply to the Shoutbox. 8. Any Member who does not log in for a period of two months will be immediately terminated. 9. Supreme Adjudicators will be elected to a term not exceeding ONE calendar year (365 days). 10. All suspensions may be appealed. An appeal must be made within 24 hours of notice of a suspension and any submissions must be posted in the Penalty Box within 48 hours of the notice. If 24 hours passes without an appeal, the Member will begin serving his/her suspension. All Members of CB may be involved in the appeal process. The Supreme Adjudicator will render a final decision which may include: a) upholding the original suspension; b) amending the suspension period (either higher or lower); nullifying the suspension. 12. Any Member may ask for a vote to impeach the Supreme Adjudicator. In 30 days, a vote will be held to determine whether or not the Supreme Adjudicator should stay in his/her role. During the intermediary period, a thread will be created in Board Announcements, wherein the members of CB may debate the motion to impeach. If the vote is unanimous, the Supreme Adjudicator will be removed immediately and the Member who launched the impeachment motion will be installed as the Interim Supreme Adjudicator. Members including the deposed Supreme Adjudicator will have 14 days to declare their candidacy for Supreme Adjudicator in Board Announcements. 30 days after the deadline for announcement of candidacy, an election will be held. If only one member declares his/her candidacy, he/she will automatically become Supreme Adjudicator at the expiration of 30 days. If no member declares his/her candidacy, the Interim Supreme Adjudicator will assume the position of Supreme Adjudicator at the expiration of 30 days after the deadline for candidacy. He/she will be Supreme Adjudicator for a term of one year. If the motion to impeach fails, the Member who launched the motion will be suspended for a period of 120 days for causing undue instability to the Board and for damaging the reputation of the Supreme Adjudicator. Any Member who invokes Rule 12 may withdraw his/her invocation at any time before the day of the scheduled impeachment vote at no penalty. 16. No member may change his/her Member Name more than ONE time per year up to a maximum of THREE name changes. Name changes will be approved or denied by the discretion of the Supreme Adjudicator or Interim Supreme Adjudicator if applicable. 17. No member or guest of Chatterb0x may post any altered picture, video or audio recording of any other mmber or guest of Chatterb0x without that Member or Guest's expressed written permission. Furthermore, no member or guest of Chatterb0x may post any altered picture, video, or audio recording of any mmber or gest's family members, friends, acquaintances, or colleagues without the expressed written permission of that member or guest. Any violation will lead to an automatic 100 day suspension from Chatterb0x. A subsequent violation will result in a 1,000 day suspension from Chatterb0x. A third violation will result in a 10,000 day suspension from Chatterb0x. A fourth violation will result in a 25,000 day suspension from Chatterb0x. 18. Under exceptional times of threats (internal and/or external), and backed by a simple majority vote of Members, the Supreme Adjudicator may declare martial law whereby all rules will be immediately suspended. The Supreme Adjudicator will have then been granted full authority for a period of up to 30 days to carry out whatever action(s) he/she deems necessary to protect and preserve the wellbeing of Chatterb0x and its Members. 19. Chatterb0x Election Day will be September 7 of every year. All Active Members as of 9:00 AM Atlantic Time on August 31 will be listed as candidates; at which time the poll will open. Members serving suspensions will not be eligible. The poll will close at 9:00 PM Atlantic Time on September 7. The winner will become Supreme Adjudicator of Chatterb0x at 12:00 AM Atlantic Time on September 8. 20. In the event of a Supreme Adjudicator's resignation, death, or physical/mental incapacity to fulfill the role, the Member with the second amount of votes in the previous Chatterb0x election will become Interim Supreme Adjudicator effective immediately. If there was no sole second place finisher, the previous Supreme Adjudicator will become Interim Supreme Adjudicator effective immediately. The successor will retain his/her Interim Supreme Adjudicator position unless altered via Rules 12, 19, or this Rule. 21. Any member who suggests or actively tries to split up the Slammy Gang will be charged with treason and if convicted by a simple majority vote, be banned from Chatterb0x for life. 22. The threshold for conviction for violations of Rules 3, 5, and 17 is beyond a reasonable doubt. 23. The Supreme Adjudicator has full discretion to edit or delete any posts he/she believes could, did, or are causing instability to Chatterb0x. 24. The Supreme Adjudicator may suspend a member he/she suspects of treasonous or pernicious activity for up to SEVEN days without a formal charge. 25. Any member who intentionally causes instability to Chatterb0x through pernicious activity will be charged with causing a disturbance to Chatterb0x. If convicted by a simple majority vote, he/she will be sentenced to a suspension of between 90 to 999 days. |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Hookers; The ethics of paying for sex | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 10 2012, 02:16 PM (304 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Dec 10 2012, 02:16 PM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
Question: What are the ethics of paying strange female (or male for that matter) to come over so you can get laid? Would you ever consider it? Or have done it? I was recently in discussion with a man about this. During times of "singlehood", he had engaged in procuring sexual services from ladies of the night. His attitude was: "Hey, I was just sick of the dating scene. You go on Match......send out 200 emails to maybe get two dates......then the woman turns out to be a) a bitch, b) non-compatible, or c) just interested in how much money you make and what kind of car you drive. This was easier. Plus maybe a factor of laziness.....easier to do this, than investing the effort in a real relationship. And besides......how is it any different than going to a bar and picking up a drunk chick for the night? At least this way (hooker), both people know where things stand." This particular man has quite a strong moral compass when it comes to infidelity. He really doesn't tolerate or have anything remotely nice to say about people who cheat in a relationship. I pointed out the irony of this as compared with what "some people" might think was a total lack of moral character for hiring whores to get laid??? He said "Well, at least I wasn't HURTING anyone. I was SINGLE." What do people think? Is it just supporting the economy? Bleh..... |
|
|
| Supreme Adjudicator Admin | Dec 10 2012, 04:14 PM Post #2 |
|
Founder Account
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I believe that all forms of prostitution should be 100% legal although I doubt I would ever use these services. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 10 2012, 04:22 PM Post #3 |
|
Deleted User
|
Well, putting aside whether it should be "legal" or not.....what are you thoughts about it regarding ethics? Do men who use these services.... are they creeps? Is it better than picking up person in bar for one-night-stand? |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 11 2012, 03:15 PM Post #4 |
|
Deleted User
|
I was a hustler when I was younger. I think its an awesome way for an otherwise unskilled person to make money with a asset that is thiers alone,who cares what the law says? I would encourage anyone who can stand it to try it,if they need money or just like doing it. |
|
|
| Supreme Adjudicator Admin | Dec 11 2012, 03:18 PM Post #5 |
|
Founder Account
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Prostitution is pretty much legal now in Canada thanks to that Ontario Court ruling a while back. Streetwalking is still illegal though. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 11 2012, 03:55 PM Post #6 |
|
Deleted User
|
So what did you charge Nate? And what did that buy? |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 11 2012, 03:57 PM Post #7 |
|
Deleted User
|
I think it should be legal. I have no moral obligation with it either. I'd never pay for one. I've gone to strip clubs for bachelor parties and never gotten a lap dance. I refuse to pay for fake intimacy. If I need intimacy I'd rather take the effort to find someone that it meant something with. Fortunately I'm not a heavy needer of intimacy. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 11 2012, 04:00 PM Post #8 |
|
Deleted User
|
I looked at this hooker site my bf had been "a member" of before we met. One of the girls (writing her bio) blabbed on about how she was very "entimate". Holy fuck. Well, I guess her brains didn't get her the job! All I could think of was roaches. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 11 2012, 04:04 PM Post #9 |
|
Deleted User
|
Oops, I meant no moral objection. That's what I get for trying to type up a response when I'm distracted. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 11 2012, 04:19 PM Post #10 |
|
Deleted User
|
The term 'hooker' sounds so seventies. Speaking of slang terms I saw a clip from The British police series of the 70s The Sweeney and the hero inspector Reagan of the Flying Squad called a woman a 'slag'. Slag can mean two things depending on the gender of the person being called a slag. Used against a woman it means that she is sexually promiscuous and the caller disapproves of this. Used against a man it means that he is a petty criminal that the police and other criminals have no respect for. The Sweeney was by today's standards very sexist female characters were there as sex objects, tea-makers and typists. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 11 2012, 06:01 PM Post #11 |
|
Deleted User
|
I guess this is the difference for men and women? If I was single, and I wanted to have sex.....I know I could go down to the swanky hookup bar down the road, and I would get laid. Finding men who want sex is not a problem. But not the same for a guy? A man could go to same bar, and if he starts chatting up the wrong woman, he could end up $100 bucks poorer and alone at the end of the night. So why risk it? Might as well spend $200 out the chute and get a sure thing? Shudder......... Plus no hangover the next day. You just have to hope she wasn't carrying the clap in her throat (and yes, it does live there too). |
|
|
| Supreme Adjudicator Admin | Dec 11 2012, 06:31 PM Post #12 |
|
Founder Account
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well said!! |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 11 2012, 06:46 PM Post #13 |
|
Deleted User
|
Any guy can get laid any night they want. The advantage women have is they get approached, so they automatically have everyone not interested removed from the equation up front. Men have to approach to determine who is interested, so their process takes more work. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 11 2012, 10:50 PM Post #14 |
|
Deleted User
|
I don't like it because most of them are hooked on drugs (they have to!). |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 12 2012, 11:19 AM Post #15 |
|
Deleted User
|
That's my issue with it too, Hmm. Pretty much all of the prostitutes round here (and there's a harbour so there are a lot) are drug addicts and they do it to support their habit. That makes them vulnerable and the men that use them disgust me more than I can express. Having said that if it's a womans chosen "career" and she's not forced into it either by someone else, homelessness or an addiction then I don't have a problem with it. |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics/Religion/Sex · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2







![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)


3:44 PM Jul 11