|
RP Time: OST
Population: XX Nations Technology: Post/Modern
|
![]() Founder: Dom | Prime Minister: Vacant| RP Ministers: Vacant ..:: YOUR NEWS : 16 OCT '14 ::.. ***Things That Happened, Did*** |
![]() |
| Welcome to Caprecian Continents. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Proposal Drafting; Because I think it would be cool | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 4 2010, 04:00 AM (235 Views) | |
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 4 2010, 04:00 AM Post #1 |
|
Unregistered
|
Hey folks, I think it'd be pretty nifty if we drafted a proposal, and submitted it to the WA, just to see how it goes down. Obviously it should be something we care about, but also something that politically would get lots of support. We can even give it a test run on the official NS forums for discussion of WA proposals. I think our proposal should be a Human Rights thing, personally. perhaps something thats in the news these days, the Airline Passengers bill of rights? or something to that effect. thoughts? |
|
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 5 2010, 10:18 AM Post #16 |
|
Unregistered
|
Hows this? [EDIT] I should check to make sure this is not redundant or already has a ruling. [EDIT2] So far, looks like this is a perfectly original proposal! Rawk!
|
|
|
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 6 2010, 09:45 AM Post #17 |
|
Unregistered
|
one more revision. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS?! otherwise i'll submit this tomorrow with the presumed support of the caprecian people ![]() I'll call it Mild strength, and title it "Resolution to Restrict Use of Private Military Companies" hows that for y'all? |
|
|
| Aetericus | Jan 6 2010, 09:50 AM Post #18 |
|
Medium State
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Change "calls upon" to "creates", otherwise you're invoking the powers of an organization that does not exist. |
![]() |
|
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 6 2010, 09:51 AM Post #19 |
|
Unregistered
|
thanks! for convenience, i just edited the other post. |
|
|
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 7 2010, 09:14 AM Post #20 |
|
Unregistered
|
seeing no severe objections, im going to submit this janx. thank you all for your assistance, lets see how it goes! "Resolution to Restrict PMC's" is the title i used. |
|
|
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 7 2010, 09:25 AM Post #21 |
|
Unregistered
|
<_< at least i had some fun in my brief tenure as Delegate... |
|
|
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 7 2010, 09:49 AM Post #22 |
|
Unregistered
|
D: its getting ripped to shreds! http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.ph...t=31659&start=0 i posted it there for advertising, and it doesn't appear that anyone likes it XD |
|
|
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 8 2010, 08:16 AM Post #23 |
|
Unregistered
|
The mods pulled my proposal -.- D: i guess it violated one of the rules? i'm not sure which one, i looked at it very closely and saw nothing inherently wrong. i guess it could've been too optional? dunno. thanks for the help anyway, folks. [EDIT] Heres what was said on the Forum about my "advertisement"-turned-critique
|
|
|
| Sapphire | Jan 8 2010, 10:08 AM Post #24 |
|
Super Power
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Isn't the problem that it's all optional, apart from the creation of a committee, and that violates 'Committees are additions to Proposals; they shouldn't be all the Proposal does'?? At least, at a glance, that seems to be the first violation that springs to mind, though I'm not certain it's a direct violation. |
![]() |
|
| Aetericus | Jan 8 2010, 10:19 AM Post #25 |
|
Medium State
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You forgot to change "calls upon" to creates". The problem is that you submitted a proposal that didn't do anything. All you really did was say "hey guys, we should probably do this stuff". |
![]() |
|
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 8 2010, 10:20 AM Post #26 |
|
Unregistered
|
I was thinking in terms of Model UN (which i do at college) which is indeed all they do. recommendations. i should've read the regs more carefully. we'll try again though, and get it right. |
|
|
| Aetericus | Jan 8 2010, 10:27 AM Post #27 |
|
Medium State
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well then I guess your problem was that you were thinking in terms of the RL UN, which never actually accomplishes anything because the Security Council nations can't be arsed. Think of the WA as a functional, non-decrepit version of the UN |
![]() |
|
| Epsilon Andromedae | Jan 8 2010, 01:35 PM Post #28 |
|
Unregistered
|
yeah i'm glad Max was smart enough to make the WA somewhat functional
|
|
|
| Ubiquisque | Jan 9 2010, 12:04 AM Post #29 |
|
Large State
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm disappointed for you EA - especially when I have no problems recalling far worse proposals in the WA that are totally pointless. Their criteria do appear a little fluid... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Wolf's Tavern · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:27 PM Jul 11
|
|
|
|
edge created by tiptopolive of ifsz



















![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)

8:27 PM Jul 11