| Welcome to A World Power! Our forum acts as the hub of our community, and is where our Government, Citizens Assembly, and Regional Defence Force are coordinated. But it's not all serious business! The legendary Rucket Park is full of polls, spam games and nonsense chat, our Role Playing Pavilion is the place for all your roleplaying needs, and the A World Power Center is where we get to know each other. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. To sign-up for Citizenship and post on the forums, you'll need to register an account. This allows you to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Register now! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Repeal Ministerial Powers Bill | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 9 Nov 2008, 18:51 (20 Views) | |
| AmericaXLI | 9 Nov 2008, 18:51 Post #1 |
![]()
Amex
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Repeal Ministerial Powers Bill Purpose: This bill will repeal the legislation "Ministerial Powers Act" as passed by the regional Senate on 4th May 2008. We acknowledge the obstacle caused by the enforcement of the Ministerial Powers Act that has resulted in a sluggish and slow legislative system. In order to free up our important legislative body to be far more efficient and active this repeal enables all members of the Senate to present bills to the Senate as and when they are ready. Whilst approving of the intentions in ensuring elected officials hold increased power our experiences have taught us that this legislation was unable to provide for such without derisory effects on the system as a whole. We therefore repeal the quoted law in search of a better solution and in the interests of effective government. Introduction: I Ranholn, Two Tearm Senator for the South, Chariman and founding Member of the Independent People Party, Member of Committe for Commerce and Development, and Author of the Laws Creating Political Parties and Regions of the North and South. I have seen the structure that has come about for the Senate and see a need for change, I feel this will better allow the Elected Members of this body to represent those whom have given there trust and support to Represent. What I refear to are The Powers of Minister and Elected Senator. Body: Article One: Minsters as of right now for all purposes those that have right to be part of the Senate have equal power and Authority as The Elected Senators. ~Subsection A: The Elected Senators, As I am refearing to them, are Elected with the support and trust of the people of this region. They are the voice and will of the people. ~Subsection B: The Minsters who are part of the senate are chosen for the ability to handle the department they are head of. They are appointed and are not holding the same trust or charge of the people of this region. Article Two: With what Was Stated in Article One, It seems that The Minsters are not under the same rights of the Senate but are givin the same privliges and powers as those with the support of the People of this region. To Make sure the will of the people is truly shown Changes will be made. ~Subsection A: With this Stated The Ministers will stripped of there rights to make general Porposals for laws and changes to laws and stipulations for this Region. ~Subsection B: With the Stated Subsection of Article Two A They will how ever be granted the rights to Make proposals that are directly related to there Departments. SubLine 1: The Relevence a Proposal has to a department may be challanged by an Elected Senator or a Minister, from with a vote on the relevence will be had in witch only Elected Members can take part. Subpoint a: If the Majority Votes that it is Revelent it will be maintained and put forth for general discusion and vote. Subpoint b: IF the majority vote that it is not revelent it will be stripped and removed from the senate floor, the Minster may submit it by way of the Senator that Represents them. Subpoint c: If there is a Tie the Founder will cast the Deciding vote, he will not vote otherwise. Subline 2: Minister Proposed Proposals that are not challanged for the releventce to there Department shall go forth as a Traditional Proposal. what do you guys think of this bill. |
RDF Sergeant Major (SGM)
| |
![]() |
|
| Biain the First | 9 Nov 2008, 20:01 Post #2 |
|
Ninja Panda
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm for it (but then again I'm voting so maybe my opinion doesn't count so much :P) |
Is the red panda god of Confusing and Fun times![]() Winner of AWP Best Avatar 2007
| |
![]() |
|
| AP3 10 | 9 Nov 2008, 23:59 Post #3 |
|
AWP Veteran
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Seems o.k, Are we sure a amendment cutting most of it out wouldn't be better than a blunt repeal? |
AP3 10 ![]() WA Member AWP Citizen, Service in the Legislature, Military, Economic and Diplomatic Services. Sergeant (SGT) of AWP RDF: Ex-Citizen of The Anumist Alliance, Hethrum and Nova Imperium | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Government Archives · Next Topic » |











1:05 AM Jul 11