.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Visit ANWA on:
ANWA Facebook Group Follow ANWA on Twitter Visit ANWA's Youtube Channel


Profile Hover Offline Hover Member-View Offline Hover Online Hover Member-View Online Hover Edit Hover Report Hover Delete Hover Quote Hover Goto Top Hover Big Button Hover Big Button Active
Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Share |
Welcome to ANWA Clan HQ. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join ANWA Clan HQ

Please do not register your name with the ANWA tag, until you have been accepted in to the clan. Your name will be changed to include ANWA once you have been accepted into the ANWA Clan.

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
IGN Gives MW3 Wii 4.5/10
Topic Started: Nov 15 2011, 09:43 PM (1,760 Views)
ANWA-Sephiroth
Member Avatar
Lt. General
Posted Image

IGN gives MW3 for Wii a 4.5/10!

MW3 Wii IGN Review

In IGN's review of the Wii version of MW3, the game is severely criticized to the extent that quite a good game, is given a 4.5! Honestly, I can't believe this score. In my last few days of playing, I would at least give the game a 7.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Corpsecreate
Member Avatar
Colonel
I'd have given something within that range too.
Edited by Corpsecreate, Nov 15 2011, 10:01 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Luminal
Member Avatar
No-Life
There is no way I could give MW3 a 4.5! It all comes down to what they are trying to achieve and I think a lot of that not being met is to do with the online capability and general horse power behind the Wii.

Honestly I am not sure if they just repackaged Black Ops would have sufficed for most Wii owners. We want it all whether or not our little white box is capable or not!

Some could point to Goldeneye as being a game tailored for the Wii but who plays that online?
ANWA*LUMINAL - "I speak my mind..sometimes you may not like what my mind has to say!"
Posted Image
Posted Image
Not just bright...I'm Luminal!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Corpsecreate
Member Avatar
Colonel
I'd give Goldeneye a 1 out of 10 and thats being generous.

The biggest problem with rating a game is what you are comparing it with. If your going to compare MW3 Wii with the PS360 versions then of course you should expect a lower score than the HD counterpart. If you rate it as a standalone game, as in, as if it was the only video game in existance, then a "graphics" statistic can't be given as there is no comparison. Instead, things like framerate/vertical sync/graphical style would soley fall under graphics.

When I 'rate' a game, I just look at it as it is. Multiplayer is unplayable, so I would give the online a 0.1/10. I give it the 0.1 because it at least connects to the internet, beyond that it is a waste of time atm. I can't speak for the campaign, i havent played it. The interface hasn't been thought through at all, it fails on extremely basic levels. Graphically, the game looks decent enough, the problem is the framerate drops. Unacceptable in my eyes, I would much rather constant 30 fps with worse graphics than below 30 fps.

When it comes to CoD on Wii though, the real problem is not that the Wii is not powerful enough. A lot of people think this but the real reason is that the CoD graphics engine isnt built for the Wii. Just take a look at Metroid Prime 3, that game runs at constant 60 fps AND it looks better (imo). Need I remind you that MP3 is a tweak of a GAMECUBE graphics engine.

With a properly built engine for the Wii, games could look a lot better.
Edited by Corpsecreate, Nov 15 2011, 10:24 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Luminal
Member Avatar
No-Life
Well there you go! We don't have much but there is no question Treyarch try very hard each year with jack shit resources. Activision doesn't care about the Wii versions and that's been proven time and time again!
ANWA*LUMINAL - "I speak my mind..sometimes you may not like what my mind has to say!"
Posted Image
Posted Image
Not just bright...I'm Luminal!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ANWA-Sephiroth
Member Avatar
Lt. General
This game's graphics for the Wii are god damn amazing, example: Resistance map. This review I think is just comparing it to the other versions, which isn't fair because IGN fails to realize how much better the Wii online community is. God dammit ign.

Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ANWA-R-M-B
Member Avatar
Super Saiyan
You must be on Crack Cocaine to give Golden eye 1 out of 10, maybe 4.5 is right for the wii version cause they may have only played the campaign and maybe some survival and if they played online they wouldn't have been impressed with the connection
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Luminal
Member Avatar
No-Life
Corpsecreate is obviously a very tough scorer or he may want to work for IGN..lol!
ANWA*LUMINAL - "I speak my mind..sometimes you may not like what my mind has to say!"
Posted Image
Posted Image
Not just bright...I'm Luminal!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ANWA|*stars. QLD
Member Avatar
Captain
4.5 on the wii? are you retarded? it's a game, designed to be for fun. if you rate a game lower than 5 , especially call of duty on the wii, than you can just f**k off regardless if you continue to play the wii or not. play it with pride, not resent.
Edited by ANWA-TXT, Nov 16 2011, 12:08 AM.
WISH UPON THE STARS THAT YOU WON'T GET RAPED TO DEATH :D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ANWA-sUB
Member Avatar
DDSPA Co-Leader
Hey there starsy :D long time no see.

I personally think it should get higher than a 4.5
Even though I haven't played it, it can't be so bad to get that score.

Hopefully the main issues of the game will be fixed by when I get it!
Posted Image
~
Black Ops FC ~ 5033-2184-8634
Mario Kart FC ~ 1333-5373-5885
Modern Warfare: Reflex FC ~ 2485-7063-8148
Modern Warfare 3 FC ~ 3087-5645-3968

ANWA|*sUB

youtube/ssssssUB


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Lower than I suspected, I haven't played the game but I just assumed it would be at least a 6. I am going with what Corpse says though, as he has actually played online. His score is a 1, and who knows? IGN may have given the multiplayer a 1 too, perhaps the single player just made up for it.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Corpsecreate
Member Avatar
Colonel
I am tough with my scores yeah. Its 2011, games are no longer in their infancy. Making amateur mistakes in GUI functionality (especially when their previous game didn't have these errors) is simply inexcusable. Making the hit detection AND framerate worse than their predecessor is a step backwards and is again inexcusable. There is no good reason for this to happen and yet it did.

Oh and lets just forget about the self corrupting save data...Seriously did they test this game AT ALL?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Luminal
Member Avatar
No-Life
I think very little testing occurred but again I would imagine Treyarch would have been on a tight schedule. I heard the Wii developers at Treyarch had problems getting working copies of the HD versions of Black Ops required to port the game and this was within the same company. I would imagine it would have been even harder this time as Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer Games were in charge.

Again only the Call of Duty series have done back end patching in a Wii game so lets hope they can eradicate some of the major gripes of the game with a future patch!
Edited by Luminal, Nov 16 2011, 12:44 AM.
ANWA*LUMINAL - "I speak my mind..sometimes you may not like what my mind has to say!"
Posted Image
Posted Image
Not just bright...I'm Luminal!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

ANWA-Sephiroth
Nov 15 2011, 10:20 PM
This game's graphics for the Wii are god damn amazing, example: Resistance map. This review I think is just comparing it to the other versions, which isn't fair because IGN fails to realize how much better the Wii online community is. God dammit ign.

Posted Image
Yikes, I don't want t sound like an arse, but you saying wii has abetter community is your opinion. Not fact.

While i do see where you are coming from about the review that is harsh and i agree, but it would be hard to not judge/compare it to the 360/pc and ps3 versions of the games as they do exist.

the only thing they could have judged it down on are the textures and possibly lack of 1-2 maps or some equipment kill streaks and attachments.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
ANWA-$ama$
Member Avatar
General
I don't think you can compare Wii to the other systems.
It's a different style of game play for one.
It's like comparing Elephant's & Kangaroo's.
I like my Wii but power wise the other systems beat the Wii hands down.
But I play for fun, not for graphic's, so if the game play is good.
I'm happy. :D
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Wii · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1

Newest Comments

Loading...
BOOKMARK & HOMEPAGE
Site Hits

hit counter






Who Dares Wins!

Latest Video Game News
Links
IGN
Gamespot
Kotaku
The Magic Box
MMGN
PALGN
Click Me!